How does the introduction of LLM "AI" (both in idea and execution) reconcile with MDN and Mozilla's stated ideals?

[Sephsekla]

From the Mozilla Manifesto:

Principle 8

Transparent community-based processes promote participation, accountability and trust.

There was no transparency, discussion or oversight to the introduction of this controversial technology, and indeed it appeared to bypass standard procedures for contribution. What is the reason for this direct contradiction of a principle?

From the About MDN page:

Accurate and vetted for quality

Through our GitHub documentation repository, contributors can make changes, submit pull requests, have their contributions reviewed and then merged with existing content. Through this workflow, we welcome the vast knowledge and experience of our developer community while maintaining a high level of quality, accurate content.

There are numerous examples in mdn/yari#9208 of clearly incorrect, unvetted (by virtue of its generation) content being displayed to visitors to the site. If this LLM-based content continues to disprove this claim, does the MDN team plan to remove this section from the About page, since it is now provably untrue?

[Ultrabenosaurus]

@LeoMcA @caugner @Rumyra have MDN abandoned their promise to answer all community questions?