Skip to content

Add an "Animation types" page #367

Answered by teoli2003
yarusome asked this question in Content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

What about repurposing "Animatable CSS properties": instead of listing the useless list of animatable property (and getting rid of the macro), we list these predefined type (except prose).

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@yarusome
Comment options

Answer selected by yarusome
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants