Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Every time I look at this part of MDN I feel sad inside. The tutorial is nowhere near the official docs in terms of breadth and depth, and it always gets helplessly outdated because no-one updates them except new learners trying to help each other. Is it really relevant in the long term? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Yes, we should reorganise as you have suggested. I agree that there are bigger questions around the lifespan of this whole section, but even that is conceptually easier to handle if all the content we're talking about is grouped. I can do this if you want? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the Learn docs, we have Tools and testing, and then under that Tools and testing/Understanding client-side JavaScript frameworks. And then under that we have a collection of guide pages, that fall into six quite well defined categories:
In the sidebar, these six categories are presented as six distinct groups:
...but on disk/URL hierarchy, they are not - all the pages live directly under Tools and testing/Understanding client-side JavaScript frameworks.
I'd like to suggest we reorg them a little. Specifically:
Like this:
My immediate motivation for this is that I think we could greatly simplify the Learn sidebar macro if the sidebar categories map to directories. But I also think this organization makes sense.
I've not been very closely involved with this end of Learn though, so I'd like to know if anyone thinks this is a Bad Idea.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions