You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I thought that since the project tries to be Array API compatible (and not much more), it might be useful to match the version scheme to that used by the standard. For instance, the library is now (mostly) compatible with the standard version 2023.12, so perhaps our first "real" release would be 2023.12.0, and we'd increment that last number with bug-fix releases. Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At least dask regretted calver (the 4 digit year may be worst). While the added information of the effver we all use may not matter much right now, one annoying thing about calver is that it is a one way road: there is no way back from a 4 digit year as the major version.
I thought that since the project tries to be Array API compatible (and not much more), it might be useful to match the version scheme to that used by the standard. For instance, the library is now (mostly) compatible with the standard version 2023.12, so perhaps our first "real" release would be 2023.12.0, and we'd increment that last number with bug-fix releases. Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: