Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How do I create "data/1kg_gnn.csv"? #72

Open
T-Funayama opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

How do I create "data/1kg_gnn.csv"? #72

T-Funayama opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@T-Funayama
Copy link

I created "1kg_chr20.snipped.trees.gnn.csv" using "human-data/Makefile".
However, "1kg_chr20.snipped.trees.gnn.csv" and "data/1kg_gnn.csv" values did not match.
Would you tell me how to create "data/1kg_gnn.csv", please?

@T-Funayama T-Funayama changed the title How do I create data/1kg_gnn.csv? How do I create "data/1kg_gnn.csv"? Feb 3, 2023
@hyanwong
Copy link
Contributor

hyanwong commented Feb 3, 2023

Sorry, what do you mean by "did not match"? These are not meant to give exactly the same values. Could you possibly post e.g. the first few lines of each file here, and I can see if they are as you might expect.

Note that you might also be interested in the more recent 1kg+HDGP+SGDP analysis done in https://github.com/awohns/unified_genealogy_paper

@T-Funayama
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your response. This is the file which I created.
1kg_chr20.snipped.trees.gnn.csv

Thank you for looking into this.

@T-Funayama
Copy link
Author

Hi, could you let me know if you have any updates on this matter ?
I thought I could obtain exactly the same values, because the tool does not seem to use sampling methods such as MCMC algorithm.
Thank you very much for your consideration.

@hyanwong
Copy link
Contributor

hyanwong commented Mar 8, 2023

Hi - sorry that I didn't spot your follow up here.

You said:

"1kg_chr20.snipped.trees.gnn.csv" and "data/1kg_gnn.csv" values did not match.

Do you mean they did not match each other, or that they did not match our published data.

Note that if you are using the latest version of tsinfer, it has seen improvements to that used in the original paper, so the results will probably be slightly different anyway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants