You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a newspaper headline ends with a question mark, the answer is negative.
GitHub Issues are not newspaper articles, and I have no idea what the correct answer is, although a finer enumeration of the possible malformed documents will almost certainly lead to a situation where the conditions should have their own package(s).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My slightly less uneducated guess is that mimicing the overall approach seen in the CL package would be appropriate: major errors all have exported names, some exported names might not be usefully instantiable, and some signalled conditions might not be direct instances of the exported names.
Betteridge's Law of Headlines states:
GitHub Issues are not newspaper articles, and I have no idea what the correct answer is, although a finer enumeration of the possible malformed documents will almost certainly lead to a situation where the conditions should have their own package(s).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: