Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#2047] Regression test eSuite case document ordering #997

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

pi-sigma
Copy link
Contributor

Taiga: #2047

  • Added test to ensure case documents are ordered by date
  • Changed mocks to ensure document ordering works with time + offset (e.g. registratiedatum="2022-12-12T00:00:00+01:00")

@pi-sigma pi-sigma force-pushed the cleanup/2047-regression-test-esuite-time branch from c129118 to 8f863d4 Compare January 30, 2024 08:57
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3eac1e1) 94.75% compared to head (0e94c92) 94.73%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #997      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.75%   94.73%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          869      869              
  Lines        30288    30304      +16     
===========================================
+ Hits         28698    28709      +11     
- Misses        1590     1595       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pi-sigma pi-sigma marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2024 09:40
@pi-sigma pi-sigma force-pushed the cleanup/2047-regression-test-esuite-time branch from 8f863d4 to 0e94c92 Compare February 1, 2024 10:47
@alextreme alextreme merged commit 1442cc9 into develop Feb 5, 2024
14 checks passed
@alextreme alextreme deleted the cleanup/2047-regression-test-esuite-time branch February 5, 2024 13:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants