Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#972] Changed status ordering to reverse() to handle eSuite timeless-datetimes #388

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2022

Conversation

Bartvaderkin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #388 (12073c1) into develop (b057e4c) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #388   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    96.10%   96.10%           
========================================
  Files          462      462           
  Lines        15054    15054           
========================================
  Hits         14467    14467           
  Misses         587      587           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/open_inwoner/accounts/views/cases.py 97.38% <100.00%> (ø)
...rc/open_inwoner/openzaak/tests/test_case_detail.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@Bartvaderkin Bartvaderkin marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2022 10:49
Copy link
Contributor

@vaszig vaszig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems logical approach to me since we cannot use datumStatusGezet. I don't see though somewhere in the documentation any details about the order of the results. Maybe my dutch doesn't help

@alextreme alextreme merged commit 12247fb into develop Dec 14, 2022
@alextreme alextreme deleted the fix/972-status-ordering branch December 14, 2022 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants