You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The rough proposal would be to change FCP so it requires 75% of the SCT to +1 the FCP going forward, like it does today, but also allow an SCT member to vote 0 or -1 and express their opinion. The expression doesn't prevent FCP from starting (that's for concerns to handle), but does stop the member from being pinged every week on the MSC shortlist.
We may have to consider what 0 actually means, as it's possible a majority of the SCT is indifferent on a given MSC and could cause deadlock. Possibly we only allow +1 and -1 as formal votes, with documentation to say that indifferent is a +1.
The -1 and 0 votes are not expected to be commonly used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
turt2live
added
the
meta
Something that is not a spec change/request and is not related to the build tools
label
Jun 18, 2024
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting
The rough proposal would be to change FCP so it requires 75% of the SCT to +1 the FCP going forward, like it does today, but also allow an SCT member to vote 0 or -1 and express their opinion. The expression doesn't prevent FCP from starting (that's for concerns to handle), but does stop the member from being pinged every week on the MSC shortlist.
We may have to consider what 0 actually means, as it's possible a majority of the SCT is indifferent on a given MSC and could cause deadlock. Possibly we only allow +1 and -1 as formal votes, with documentation to say that indifferent is a +1.
The -1 and 0 votes are not expected to be commonly used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: