Skip to content

MSC4196: MatrixRTC voice and video conferencing application m.call #4196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

MSC4196: MatrixRTC voice and video conferencing application m.call #4196

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@hughns
Copy link
Member

@hughns hughns commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Rendered

To-do:

  • how do you distinguish between voice and video calls?
  • implementation using the new field structures

Dependencies:

@hughns hughns changed the title Create xxxx-matrixrtc-m-call.md MSC4196: MatrixRTC voice and video conferencing application m.call Sep 19, 2024
@turt2live turt2live added voip proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Sep 25, 2024
@ara4n ara4n added the matrix-2.0 Required for Matrix 2.0 label Sep 5, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Tracking for review in Spec Core Team Workflow Sep 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

client-server Client-Server API kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success matrix-2.0 Required for Matrix 2.0 needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal voip

Projects

Spec Core Team Workflow
Status: Tracking for review

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hughns @turt2live @ara4n