You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I suspect the reason this definition is not documented might be that it is not a good definition.
The name suggests that it is pinpointing a (finite) subcover of some cover, but there is no such original cover in the definition.
Definition hasFinSubCover (I : choiceType) (D : set I)
U (F : I -> set U) :=
exists2 D' : {fset I}, {subset D' <= D} &
\bigcup_(i in D) F i =
\bigcup_(i in [set i | i \in D']) F i.
Something like this would be more clear-cut. I suggest also adding the prefix has, if it is not violating the naming convention in mathcomp-analysis.
analysis/theories/topology.v
Lines 3013 to 3016 in 22bb6cc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: