Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

By default, alt+p triggers the binding assigned to alt+` #732

Open
antoine-levitt opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

By default, alt+p triggers the binding assigned to alt+` #732

antoine-levitt opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@antoine-levitt
Copy link

Apologies if this is not the right place to post this.

When installing a new desktop, one of the first things I do is to disable many wm shortcuts, to free up more keyboard real estate for emacs. I have been able to disable some of them using the "keyboard shortcuts". I have been able to disable even more using for i in $(seq 1 10) ; do gsettings set org.mate.Marco.global-keybindings run-command-$i ''; done. I have however been unable to disable alt+p (which opens some kind of window selector) as well as windows+s (no idea what this one does).

This is Ubuntu Mate 22.04, running Marco 1.26.0.

@antoine-levitt
Copy link
Author

antoine-levitt commented Sep 6, 2022

Ok so super+s is not marco's fault, it's mate-desktop/mate-indicator-applet#28. As for alt+p, it turned out to be a customizable shortcut in the "keyboard shortcuts" menu. That binding was set to alt+` (move between windows of an application, using a popup window), but triggered by alt+p for some reason (I use an azerty keyboard, if that changes anything). So the potentially actionable thing for marco is: by default, alt+p triggers the binding assigned to alt+`. I updated the title to reflect this.

@antoine-levitt antoine-levitt changed the title Unable to disable alt+p and win+s shortcuts on marco 1.26 By default, alt+p triggers the binding assigned to alt+` Sep 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant