You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+3-5
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -27,7 +27,10 @@ class LoadOrder
27
27
context.order =Order.find(context.id)
28
28
end
29
29
end
30
+
```
31
+
30
32
33
+
```ruby
31
34
# after
32
35
classLoadOrder
33
36
includeInteractify
@@ -55,7 +58,6 @@ organize \
55
58
->(c){ byebug if c.order.nil? },
56
59
Thing2
57
60
```
58
-
```
59
61
60
62
### Each/Iteration
61
63
@@ -225,10 +227,6 @@ end
225
227
- Is this interactor/interactor-contracts compatible?
226
228
Yes and we use them as dependencies. It's possible we'd drop those dependencies in the future but unlikely. I think it's highly likely we'd retain compatibility.
227
229
228
-
- Is this production ready?
229
-
It's used in production, but it's still early days.
230
-
There may be minor syntax changes that are proposed in future, but I don't foresee any major changes to how this will be implemented in public API terms.
231
-
We're bound by the interactor/interactor-contracts API, and bound by using it in production.
232
230
233
231
- Why not propose changes to the interactor or interactor-contracts gem?
234
232
Honestly, I think both are great and why we've built on top of them.
0 commit comments