Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Csv disk index #3089

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Oct 1, 2015
Merged

Csv disk index #3089

merged 28 commits into from
Oct 1, 2015

Conversation

artemp
Copy link
Member

@artemp artemp commented Sep 29, 2015

No description provided.

…(rhs or lhs) in operator== and operator!=

add unit test for comparing numeric mapnik::values
…on and serialization

remove utils/shapeindex/quadtree.hpp
…lue_type stored must have standard layout for correct (de)serialisation + update unit test
@@ -596,6 +608,12 @@ mapnik::featureset_ptr csv_datasource::features(mapnik::query const& q) const
return std::make_shared<csv_inline_featureset>(inline_string_, locator_, separator_, headers_, ctx_, std::move(index_array));
}
}
else if (has_disk_index_)
{
std::cerr << "DISK_INDEX" << std::endl;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@artemp - remove this debug print?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@springmeyer - yes.

@springmeyer
Copy link
Member

@artemp - looking really good / promising. What do you think about a single mapnik-index command that works to create .index for both shapefiles and csv (and more, like geojson, in the future)? What would it take to provide that?

@artemp artemp merged commit 848098b into master Oct 1, 2015
@springmeyer springmeyer added this to the Mapnik v3.0.6 milestone Oct 1, 2015
@springmeyer springmeyer deleted the csv-disk-index branch January 13, 2016 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants