Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

don't reset the QPACK encoder / decoder streams #3063

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2021

Conversation

marten-seemann
Copy link
Member

We don't need these streams, since our QPACK implementation doesn't use the dynamic table yet. However, we MUST NOT close / reset these streams. Instead, just ignore them.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3063 (6f32d2d) into master (f513437) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3063      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.05%   86.05%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         133      133              
  Lines        9438     9442       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         8121     8125       +4     
  Misses        955      955              
  Partials      362      362              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
http3/client.go 88.75% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
http3/server.go 68.38% <100.00%> (+0.23%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f513437...6f32d2d. Read the comment docs.

We don't need these streams, since our QPACK implementation doesn't use the
dynamic table yet. However, we MUST NOT close / reset these streams. Instead,
just ignore them.
@marten-seemann marten-seemann merged commit b8358dc into master Mar 8, 2021
@marten-seemann marten-seemann deleted the dont-reset-qpack-streams branch March 8, 2021 10:08
@aschmahmann aschmahmann mentioned this pull request May 14, 2021
71 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants