Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove unneeded check for the peer's transport parameters #2945

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2020

Conversation

marten-seemann
Copy link
Member

We create a new flow controller when opening a new streams. This can only happen after the session is returned, in which case we should have already received the transport parameters (this also applies to the 0-RTT case).

We create a new flow controller when opening a new streams. This can only
happen after the session is returned, in which case we should have already
received the transport parameters.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2945 (19ddefd) into master (9693a46) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2945      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.04%   86.07%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines        9286     9283       -3     
==========================================
  Hits         7990     7990              
+ Misses        938      935       -3     
  Partials      358      358              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
session.go 77.53% <0.00%> (+0.25%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9693a46...19ddefd. Read the comment docs.

@marten-seemann marten-seemann merged commit 79d14db into master Dec 22, 2020
@marten-seemann marten-seemann deleted the remove-unneeded-peer-params-check branch December 23, 2020 08:17
@aschmahmann aschmahmann mentioned this pull request May 14, 2021
71 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants