We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The ruby maintainers started to recommend not using OpenStruct https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.0.0/OpenStruct.html#class-OpenStruct-label-Caveats
OpenStruct
Also the related rule was added to rubocop: https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop/cops_style.html#styleopenstructuse ATM, it's disabled: https://github.com/local-ch/lhc/pull/205/files#diff-4f894049af3375c2bd4e608f546f8d4a0eed95464efcdea850993200db9fef5cR274
rubocop
It might make sense to think about replacing OpenStruct with Struct or Hash.
Struct
Hash
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The ruby maintainers started to recommend not using
OpenStructhttps://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.0.0/OpenStruct.html#class-OpenStruct-label-Caveats
Also the related rule was added to
rubocop:https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop/cops_style.html#styleopenstructuse
ATM, it's disabled: https://github.com/local-ch/lhc/pull/205/files#diff-4f894049af3375c2bd4e608f546f8d4a0eed95464efcdea850993200db9fef5cR274
It might make sense to think about replacing
OpenStructwithStructorHash.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: