Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

musl-cross-make in place of musl-cross #650

Closed
osresearch opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

musl-cross-make in place of musl-cross #650

osresearch opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@osresearch
Copy link
Collaborator

As mentioned by @rofl0r in #97 (comment), musl-cross-make has some advantages over musl-cross. One of the biggest is that it doesn't require absolute paths burned into the executables and also supports newer versions of binutils/gcc/etc.
This was referenced Jan 7, 2020
Closed
Closed
Closed
@osresearch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Implemented in #653

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@osresearch