Test that do_attempt_write_data does not infinitely loop

when all the channel messages can't fit into the buffer.

Adds a test for PR #550.

Author: valentinewallace

lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@@ -1149,13 +1149,21 @@ impl<Descriptor: SocketDescriptor, CM: Deref> PeerManager<Descriptor, CM> where
 
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
+	use secp256k1::Signature;
+	use bitcoin::BitcoinHash;
+	use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
+	use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::genesis_block;
+	use bitcoin_hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash;
+	use bitcoin_hashes::Hash;
 	use ln::peer_handler::{PeerManager, MessageHandler, SocketDescriptor};
 	use ln::msgs;
+	use ln::features::ChannelFeatures;
 	use util::events;
 	use util::test_utils;
 	use util::logger::Logger;
+	use util::ser::Writeable;
 
-	use secp256k1::Secp256k1;
+	use secp256k1::{Secp256k1, Message};
 	use secp256k1::key::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
 
 	use rand::{thread_rng, Rng};
@@ -1199,7 +1207,7 @@ mod tests {
 		chan_handlers
 	}
 
-	fn create_network<'a>(peer_count: usize, chan_handlers: &'a Vec<test_utils::TestChannelMessageHandler>) -> Vec<PeerManager<FileDescriptor, &'a test_utils::TestChannelMessageHandler>> {
+	fn create_network<'a>(peer_count: usize, chan_handlers: &'a Vec<test_utils::TestChannelMessageHandler>, routing_handlers: Option<&'a Vec<Arc<msgs::RoutingMessageHandler>>>) -> Vec<PeerManager<FileDescriptor, &'a test_utils::TestChannelMessageHandler>> {
 		let mut peers = Vec::new();
 		let mut rng = thread_rng();
 		let logger : Arc<Logger> = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
@@ -1208,12 +1216,15 @@ mod tests {
 
 		for i in 0..peer_count {
 			let router = test_utils::TestRoutingMessageHandler::new();
+			let router = if let Some(routers) = routing_handlers { routers[i].clone() } else {
+				Arc::new(router)
+			};
 			let node_id = {
 				let mut key_slice = [0;32];
 				rng.fill_bytes(&mut key_slice);
 				SecretKey::from_slice(&key_slice).unwrap()
 			};
-			let msg_handler = MessageHandler { chan_handler: &chan_handlers[i], route_handler: Arc::new(router) };
+			let msg_handler = MessageHandler { chan_handler: &chan_handlers[i], route_handler: router };
 			let peer = PeerManager::new(msg_handler, node_id, &ephemeral_bytes, Arc::clone(&logger));
 			peers.push(peer);
 		}
@@ -1239,7 +1250,7 @@ mod tests {
 		// push a DisconnectPeer event to remove the node flagged by id
 		let chan_handlers = create_chan_handlers(2);
 		let chan_handler = test_utils::TestChannelMessageHandler::new();
-		let mut peers = create_network(2, &chan_handlers);
+		let mut peers = create_network(2, &chan_handlers, None);
 		establish_connection(&peers[0], &peers[1]);
 		assert_eq!(peers[0].peers.lock().unwrap().peers.len(), 1);
 
@@ -1256,11 +1267,12 @@ mod tests {
 		peers[0].process_events();
 		assert_eq!(peers[0].peers.lock().unwrap().peers.len(), 0);
 	}
+
 	#[test]
-	fn test_timer_tick_occured(){
+	fn test_timer_tick_occurred() {
 		// Create peers, a vector of two peer managers, perform initial set up and check that peers[0] has one Peer.
 		let chan_handlers = create_chan_handlers(2);
-		let peers = create_network(2, &chan_handlers);
+		let peers = create_network(2, &chan_handlers, None);
 		establish_connection(&peers[0], &peers[1]);
 		assert_eq!(peers[0].peers.lock().unwrap().peers.len(), 1);
 
@@ -1272,4 +1284,124 @@ mod tests {
 		peers[0].timer_tick_occured();
 		assert_eq!(peers[0].peers.lock().unwrap().peers.len(), 0);
 	}
+
+	pub struct TestRoutingMessageHandler {}
+
+	impl TestRoutingMessageHandler {
+		pub fn new() -> Self {
+			TestRoutingMessageHandler {}
+		}
+
+	}
+	impl msgs::RoutingMessageHandler for TestRoutingMessageHandler {
+		fn handle_node_announcement(&self, _msg: &msgs::NodeAnnouncement) -> Result<bool, msgs::LightningError> {
+			Err(msgs::LightningError { err: "", action: msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError })
+		}
+		fn handle_channel_announcement(&self, _msg: &msgs::ChannelAnnouncement) -> Result<bool, msgs::LightningError> {
+			Err(msgs::LightningError { err: "", action: msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError })
+		}
+		fn handle_channel_update(&self, _msg: &msgs::ChannelUpdate) -> Result<bool, msgs::LightningError> {
+			Err(msgs::LightningError { err: "", action: msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError })
+		}
+		fn handle_htlc_fail_channel_update(&self, _update: &msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate) {}
+		fn get_next_channel_announcements(&self, starting_point: u64, batch_amount: u8) -> Vec<(msgs::ChannelAnnouncement, msgs::ChannelUpdate,msgs::ChannelUpdate)> {
+			let mut chan_anns = Vec::new();
+			let end: u64 = if starting_point > 0 { 6 } else { batch_amount.into() };
+			for j in starting_point..end {
+				let chan_upd_1 = get_dummy_channel_update(j);
+				let chan_upd_2 = get_dummy_channel_update(j);
+				let chan_ann = get_dummy_channel_announcement(j);
+
+				chan_anns.push((chan_ann, chan_upd_1, chan_upd_2));
+			}
+
+			chan_anns
+		}
+
+		fn get_next_node_announcements(&self, _starting_point: Option<&PublicKey>, _batch_amount: u8) -> Vec<msgs::NodeAnnouncement> {
+			Vec::new()
+		}
+
+		fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
+			true
+		}
+	}
+
+	fn get_dummy_channel_announcement(short_chan_id: u64) -> msgs::ChannelAnnouncement {
+		let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
+		let network = Network::Testnet;
+		let node_1_privkey = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
+		let node_2_privkey = SecretKey::from_slice(&[41; 32]).unwrap();
+		let node_1_btckey = SecretKey::from_slice(&[40; 32]).unwrap();
+		let node_2_btckey = SecretKey::from_slice(&[39; 32]).unwrap();
+		let unsigned_ann = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
+			features: ChannelFeatures::supported(),
+			chain_hash: genesis_block(network).header.bitcoin_hash(),
+			short_channel_id: short_chan_id,
+			node_id_1: PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &node_1_privkey),
+			node_id_2: PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &node_2_privkey),
+			bitcoin_key_1: PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &node_1_btckey),
+			bitcoin_key_2: PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &node_2_btckey),
+			excess_data: Vec::new(),
+		};
+
+		let msghash = Message::from_slice(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_ann.encode()[..])[..]).unwrap();
+		let node_1_sig = secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, &node_1_privkey);
+		let node_2_sig = secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, &node_2_privkey);
+		let bitcoin_1_sig = secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, &node_1_btckey);
+		let bitcoin_2_sig = secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, &node_2_btckey);
+
+		msgs::ChannelAnnouncement {
+			node_signature_1: node_1_sig,
+			node_signature_2: node_2_sig,
+			bitcoin_signature_1: bitcoin_1_sig,
+			bitcoin_signature_2: bitcoin_2_sig,
+			contents: unsigned_ann,
+		}
+	}
+
+	fn get_dummy_channel_update(short_chan_id: u64) -> msgs::ChannelUpdate {
+		use secp256k1::ffi::Signature as FFISignature;
+		let network = Network::Testnet;
+		msgs::ChannelUpdate {
+			signature: Signature::from(FFISignature::new()),
+			contents: msgs::UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+				chain_hash: genesis_block(network).header.bitcoin_hash(),
+				short_channel_id: short_chan_id,
+				timestamp: 0,
+				flags: 0,
+				cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+				htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+				fee_base_msat: 0,
+				fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+				excess_data: vec![],
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	#[test]
+	fn test_do_attempt_write_data() {
+		// Create 2 peers with custom TestRoutingMessageHandlers and connect them.
+		let chan_handlers = create_chan_handlers(2);
+		let mut routing_handlers: Vec<Arc<msgs::RoutingMessageHandler>> = Vec::new();
+		for i in 0..2 {
+			let routing_handler_option1 = TestRoutingMessageHandler::new();
+			let routing_handler_option2 = TestRoutingMessageHandler::new();
+			if i == 0 {
+				routing_handlers.push(Arc::new(routing_handler_option1));
+			} else {
+				routing_handlers.push(Arc::new(routing_handler_option2));
+			}
+		}
+		let peers = create_network(2, &chan_handlers, Some(&routing_handlers));
+
+		// By calling establish_connect, we trigger do_attempt_write_data between
+		// the peers. Previously this function would mistakenly enter an infinite loop
+		// when there were more channel messages available than could fit into a peer's
+		// buffer. This issue would now be detected by this test (because we use custom
+		// RoutingMessageHandlers that intentionally return more channel messages
+		// than can fit into a peer's buffer).
+		establish_connection(&peers[0], &peers[1]);
+		assert_eq!(peers[0].peers.lock().unwrap().peers.len(), 1);
+	}
 }