Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to CKEditor5 #618

Closed
jbalsas opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Switch to CKEditor5 #618

jbalsas opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@jbalsas
Copy link
Contributor

jbalsas commented Nov 4, 2016

CKEditor is releasing periodic Developer Previews of its newer version.

We should start playing around with it and make sure we are ready to do the switch when it's released.

This will be the base of our 2.0.0. version.

@jbalsas jbalsas added the feature label Nov 4, 2016
@jbalsas jbalsas added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Nov 4, 2016
@jbalsas
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbalsas commented May 3, 2018

I'm removing the 2.0.0 milestone since the recently released CKEditor5 is changing licensing models, so we probably need to stick with 4.x until we figure it out.

See ckeditor/ckeditor5#991 for more details about it

@jbalsas jbalsas removed this from the 2.0.0 milestone May 3, 2018
@duracell80
Copy link

Can anyone comment as to the compatibility with IE11 of CK 5 please?
ckeditor/ckeditor5#330

If there is no support for IE11, this could be a deal breaker. Also is CK going to remain the engine under Alloy or is there any discussion taking place to refactor on TinyMCE instead?

@wincent
Copy link
Contributor

wincent commented Sep 30, 2019

Closing this because of the aforementioned licensing issues. Also, no plans to drop support for IE11 as long as it appears in the Liferay DXP compatibility matrix (and it still does).

@wincent wincent closed this as completed Sep 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants