You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@citron -
so sorry for not noticing this comment earlier! My github notifications get swamped by my professional repos and I missed this.
One probably confusing historical design decision for the polyhedronisme spec is that we don't automatically canonicalize geometry - that is, there are topological operators and then "geometry smoothing/relaxation" operators that force proper planarity, centrality, etc. If you type "C100daC" you should get the proper geometry for a Rhombic Dodecahedron. The "C100" means run a relaxation iteration 100 times.
Let's build a cuboctahedron : aC
Then dual-it : daC
It should be a Rhombic Dodecahedron, no ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: