You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Audio receiving functions. Because of Discord API's specification, developers cannot establish WebSocket Connection more than 1. If we want to receive audio, we have to stop Lavalink, and establish another WS manually. This process is so tedious and so unproductive, so I'm requesting this features.
That will no be so hard (cuz just receive audio stream and send packets to client, and even I can do that).
I really appreciate if this request has been accepted.
Thanks,
Relevance
Might improve some bots because if this functions being used, we will be able to code bots which can recognize user's voice input and manipulate Lavalink's audio sending.
I was trying to do that in @discordjs/voice manually, but it was so hideous and bulky so it will be extremely helpful
Could this be a plugin instead?
To be fair, that should be fine but so I'm so bad at Java so I'm not sure it is possible.
Checklist
I have checked for duplicate issues
I have checked for existing plugins
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Change request
Audio receiving functions. Because of Discord API's specification, developers cannot establish WebSocket Connection more than 1. If we want to receive audio, we have to stop Lavalink, and establish another WS manually. This process is so tedious and so unproductive, so I'm requesting this features.
That will no be so hard (cuz just receive audio stream and send packets to client, and even I can do that).
I really appreciate if this request has been accepted.
Thanks,
Relevance
Might improve some bots because if this functions being used, we will be able to code bots which can recognize user's voice input and manipulate Lavalink's audio sending.
I was trying to do that in @discordjs/voice manually, but it was so hideous and bulky so it will be extremely helpful
Could this be a plugin instead?
To be fair, that should be fine but so I'm so bad at Java so I'm not sure it is possible.
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: