Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scope Project Responsibilities #2

Open
medley56 opened this issue Oct 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Scope Project Responsibilities #2

medley56 opened this issue Oct 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@medley56
Copy link
Member

medley56 commented Oct 5, 2024

Context

Based on a discussion we had internally at LASP, there are a lot of things that could be added to Curryer but it's not totally clear if they fit within the package scope because the package scope isn't totally defined. We don't have to stick 100% to whatever is decided but I think taking a stab would give us direction in prioritizing development work.

Suggestions

In the short description of the package in the Readme, be explicit about what the package does. e.g.

  • SPICE SPK and CK creation using MKSPK and MSOPCK
  • Abstraction of the MSOPCK and MKSPK interfaces via use of standardized dict configs (these need to be specified clearly somewhere too).
  • Kernel downloading and caching from URLs (S3 and NAIF)? @medley56 can contribute this code.
  • Geolocation and time conversion utilities building on top of SpiceyPy for common python use cases
  • Kernel inspection tools for determining time ranges, predict status, etc based on standard file naming conventions (would need to define these standard naming conventions and they may be of limited use for missions that don't use them)

These are the specific notes I wrote down from our meeting on 9/30/24

@medley56 medley56 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested labels Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant