Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
217 lines (172 loc) · 12.3 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

217 lines (172 loc) · 12.3 KB

About

Comparison of learning and inference speed of different GPU with various CNN models in pytorch List of tested AMD and NVIDIA GPUs:

Example Results

Following benchmark results has been generated with the command: ./show_benchmarks_resuls.sh Graph shows the 7700S results both with the pytorch 2.3.1 and with pytorch 2.4.0. ROCM SDK builders pytorch 2.4.0 contains the optimized flashattention support for AMD RX 7700S. (and other gfx1100/gfx1101/gfx1102 and gfx1103 cards)

Resnet Benchmark for Half-type

Benchmark Execution

Benchmarking All GPUs

This command will use pytorch to search all GPUs and will then run the benchmark for each of them separately and then in the end the benchmark that uses all of the GPUs

./run_benchmarks.sh

Benchmarking One GPU

This command shows how to execute the benchmark for single gpu by using the -i parameter.

python3 benchmark_models.py -i 1 -g 1

First GPU has index 0, second 1, etc...

Benchmark Results

  • New Results are stored under "new_results" folder
  • Existing old results are under results folder
  • After running the benchmarks, you can create a pull request to github to request to get them merged
  • You can view the results of new benchmarks by addings the name of it's result file to plot_benchmarks.py and then running the show_benchmarks.sh script.

List of Benchmarked GPUs

  • AMD_Radeon_RX_6800
  • AMD_Radeon_RX_7900_XTX
  • AMD_Radeon_RX_7700S (Framework 16 laptop discrete GPU)
  • AMD_Radeon_780M (Framework 16 laptop iGPU)
  • 1080TI
  • TITAN XP
  • TITAN V
  • 2080TI
  • Titan RTX
  • RTX 2060
  • RTX 3090
  • A100-PCIE
  • A100-SXM4

Specification

Graphics Card Name GTX 1080 Ti TITAN XP TITAN V RTX 2060 RTX 2080 Ti TITAN RTX A100-PCIE RTX 3090
Process 16nm 16nm 12nm 12nm 12nm 12nm 7nm 8 nm
Die Size 471mm² 471mm² 815mm² 445 mm² 754mm² 754mm² 826mm² 628 mm²
Transistors 11,800 million 11,800 million 21,100 million 10,800 million 18,600 million 18,600 million 54,200 million 28,300 million
CUDA Cores 3584 Cores 3840 Cores 5120 Cores 1920 Cores 4352 Cores 4608 Cores 6912 Cores 10496 Cores
Tensor Cores None None 640 Cores 240 544 Cores 576 Cores 432 Cores 328 Cores
Clock(base) 1481 MHz 1405 Mhz 1200 MHz 1365 MHz 1350 MHz 1350 MHz 765 MHz 1395 MHz
FP16 (half) 177.2 GFLOPS 189.8GFLOPS 29,798 GFLOPS 12.90 TFLOPS 26,895 GFLOPS 32.62 TFLOPS 77.97 TFLOPS 35.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float) 11,340 GFLOPS 12.15FLOPS 14,899 GFLOPS 6.451 TFLOPS 13,448 GFLOPS 16.31 TFLOPS 19.49 TFLOPS 35.58 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) 354.4 GFLOPS 379.7 GFLOPS 7,450 GFLOPS 201.6 GFLOPS 420.2 GFLOPS 509.8 GFLOPS 9.746 TFLOPS 556.0 GFLOPS
Memory 11GB GDDR5X GDDR5X 12 GB HBM2 6GB GDDR6 11 GB GDDR6 24 GB GDDR6 40GB HBM2e 24GB GDDR6X
Memory Interface 352-bit 384bit 3072-bit 192 bit 352-bit 384 bit 5120 bit 384 bit
Memory Bandwidth 484 GB/s 547.6GB/s 653GB/s 336.0 GB/s 616 GB/s 672.0 GB/s 1,555 GB/s 936.2 GB/s
Price $699 US $1,199 US $2,999 US $ 349 US $1,199 US $2,499 US $ 1,499 USD
Release Date Mar 10th, 2017 Apr 6th 2017 Dec 7th, 2017 Jan 7th, 2019 Sep 20th, 2018 Dec 18th, 2018 Jun 22nd, 2020 Sep 1st, 2020

reference site

  1. Single & multi GPU with batch size 12: compare training and inference speed of **SequeezeNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNet152, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet201, DenseNet161 mobilenet mnasnet ... **

  2. Experiments are performed on three types of the datatype. single-precision, double-precision, half-precision

  3. making plot(plotly)

Usage

././run_benchmarks.sh

Results

Requirement

  • python>=3.6(for f-formatting)
  • torchvision
  • torch>=1.0.0
  • pandas
  • psutil
  • plotly(for plot)
  • cufflinks(for plot)

Environment

  • Pytorch version 2.3
  • Number of GPUs on current device 4
  • CUDA version = 10.0
  • CUDNN version= 7601
  • nvcr.io/nvidia/pytorch:20.10-py3 (docker container in A100 and 3090)

Change Log

  • 2024/07/22
    • benchmarks can now be run also on AMD gpus
    • ./run_benchmarks.sh script uses now pytorch to query the gpu count and will first run the tests for each device separately and then by using all GPU's simultaneously
    • new benchmark results are saved to new_results/<gpu_index>/<gpu_name> folder
    • added new "-i" option which can be used to specify which GPU to use
    • If gpu index is not specified with -i option but the total gpu count specified by -g option > 1, then the tests will be run in a way that it uses all gpus simultaneously
  • 2021/02/27
    • Addition result in RTX3090
    • Addition result in RTX2060(thanks for gutama)
  • 2021/01/07
    • Addition result in TITANXP
  • 2021/01/05
    • Addition result in A100 A100-PCIE(PR#14)
  • 2021/01/04
    • Addition result in A100 SXM4
    • Addition result in TitanRTX
    • Edit coding style benchmark_model
      • f-formatting
      • save option for json
    • Edit test.sh for bash shell
    • Edit README.md
  • 2020/09/01
    • Addition result in windows10
    • Edit README.md
  • 2020/01/17
    • Edit coding style and some bug
    • Change plot method
    • Add results of various model experiments(only 2080ti)
  • 2019/01/09
    • PR Update typo (thanks for johmathe)
    • Add requirements.txt
    • Add result figures
    • Add ('TkAgg') for cli
    • Addition Muilt GPUS (DGX-station)
  • 2021/02/27
  • 2021/01/05 thanks for kirk86 pr#14
  • 2021/01/05 Thanks for kirk86 pr#14
  • 2021/01/04
  • 2021/01/04
  • thanks for olixu
  • based on 2020/01/17 update

Comparison between networks (single GPU)

Each network is fed with 12 images with 224x224x3 dimensions. For training, time durations of 20 passes of forwarding and backward are averaged. For inference, time durations of 20 passes of forwarding are averaged. 5 warm-up steps are performed that do not calculate towards the final result.

I conducted the experiment using two RTX 2080ti.

Mode gpu precision densenet121 densenet161 densenet169 densenet201 resnet101 resnet152 resnet18 resnet34 resnet50 squeezenet1_0 squeezenet1_1 vgg16 vgg16_bn vgg19 vgg19_bn
Training TITAN V single 56.17 ms 120.7 ms 72.59 ms 93.35 ms 84.59 ms 119.5 ms 16.69 ms 28.27 ms 50.54 ms 15.30 ms 9.857 ms 72.85 ms 80.95 ms 85.55 ms 94.42 ms
Inference TITAN V single 17.49 ms 39.33 ms 23.63 ms 30.93 ms 23.96 ms 34.22 ms 4.827 ms 8.428 ms 14.27 ms 4.565 ms 2.765 ms 22.94 ms 25.41 ms 27.55 ms 30.28 ms
Training TITAN V double 139.8 ms 387.4 ms 175.9 ms 224.5 ms 509.9 ms 720.0 ms 94.21 ms 194.6 ms 271.7 ms 68.38 ms 31.18 ms 1463. ms 1484. ms 1993. ms 2016. ms
Inference TITAN V double 47.68 ms 170.5 ms 60.73 ms 78.43 ms 317.7 ms 448.6 ms 60.26 ms 129.9 ms 159.8 ms 42.37 ms 11.95 ms 1261. ms 1266. ms 1745. ms 1751. ms
Training TITAN V half 43.79 ms 75.16 ms 57.53 ms 70.88 ms 47.82 ms 67.43 ms 10.48 ms 17.19 ms 29.08 ms 13.15 ms 9.390 ms 36.03 ms 46.84 ms 41.16 ms 52.65 ms
Inference TITAN V half 11.87 ms 22.88 ms 16.04 ms 20.70 ms 12.80 ms 18.11 ms 3.085 ms 5.116 ms 7.608 ms 3.694 ms 2.329 ms 10.96 ms 13.26 ms 12.72 ms 15.17 ms
Training 1080ti single 77.18 ms 164.0 ms 99.66 ms 127.6 ms 112.8 ms 158.7 ms 22.48 ms 36.80 ms 68.87 ms 20.56 ms 13.29 ms 101.8 ms 114.1 ms 119.9 ms 133.2 ms
Inference 1080ti single 23.53 ms 51.53 ms 31.82 ms 41.73 ms 33.02 ms 47.02 ms 6.426 ms 10.97 ms 20.17 ms 7.174 ms 4.370 ms 33.73 ms 37.25 ms 39.95 ms 44.12 ms
Training 1080ti double 779.5 ms 2522. ms 940.4 ms 1196. ms 2410. ms 3546. ms 463.3 ms 969.9 ms 1216. ms 259.9 ms 131.5 ms 4227. ms 4271. ms 5475. ms 5522. ms
Inference 1080ti double 47.68 ms 275.2 ms 1157. ms 328.6 ms 414.9 ms 1080. ms 1589. ms 181.1 ms 390.8 ms 529.6 ms 110.9 ms 49.96 ms 2094. ms 2103. ms 2775. ms
Training 1080ti half 43.79 ms 70.00 ms 148.4 ms 89.43 ms 113.6 ms 151.0 ms 219.5 ms 21.00 ms 34.84 ms 76.24 ms 19.60 ms 13.18 ms 91.60 ms 105.9 ms 108.1 ms
Inference 1080ti half 18.62 ms 42.26 ms 25.27 ms 33.01 ms 27.49 ms 38.88 ms 5.645 ms 9.765 ms 16.26 ms 5.869 ms 3.576 ms 30.69 ms 33.22 ms 36.71 ms 39.51 ms
Mode gpu precision resnet18 resnet34 resnet50 resnet101 resnet152 densenet121 densenet169 densenet201 densenet161 squeezenet1_0 squeezenet1_1 vgg16 vgg16_bn vgg19_bn vgg19
Training RTX 2080ti(1) single 16.36 ms 28.44 ms 49.63 ms 81.40 ms 115.1 ms 57.69 ms 75.18 ms 91.69 ms 112.7 ms 14.49 ms 9.108 ms 75.86 ms 85.42 ms 98.43 ms 88.05 ms
Inference RTX 2080ti(1) single 4.894 ms 8.624 ms 14.65 ms 24.57 ms 35.15 ms 16.70 ms 21.94 ms 28.89 ms 34.64 ms 4.704 ms 2.765 ms 23.70 ms 26.25 ms 30.82 ms 28.03 ms
Training RTX 2080ti(1) double 367.9 ms 755.4 ms 939.9 ms 1844. ms 2702. ms 593.5 ms 724.3 ms 921.3 ms 1916. ms 187.8 ms 94.99 ms 3251. ms 3277. ms 4265. ms 4238. ms
Inference RTX 2080ti(1) double 165.0 ms 328.5 ms 436.4 ms 831.0 ms 1196. ms 213.8 ms 266.0 ms 339.5 ms 910.7 ms 82.71 ms 35.79 ms 1702. ms 1708. ms 2280. ms 2274. ms
Training RTX 2080ti(1) half 13.17 ms 22.25 ms 35.46 ms 57.50 ms 81.38 ms 51.11 ms 66.88 ms 80.20 ms 88.37 ms 17.87 ms 35.75 ms 53.16 ms 63.06 ms 72.75 ms 61.95 ms
Inference RTX 2080ti(1) half 3.423 ms 5.662 ms 9.035 ms 14.51 ms 20.52 ms 13.47 ms 17.54 ms 22.51 ms 27.10 ms 4.280 ms 2.397 ms 16.14 ms 18.14 ms 19.76 ms 17.89 ms
Training RTX 2080ti(2) single 16.92 ms 29.51 ms 51.46 ms 84.90 ms 120.0 ms 58.13 ms 75.96 ms 92.47 ms 117.6 ms 14.95 ms 9.255 ms 78.95 ms 88.71 ms 102.3 ms 91.67 ms
Inference RTX 2080ti(2) single 5.107 ms 8.976 ms 15.18 ms 25.60 ms 36.60 ms 17.02 ms 22.40 ms 29.46 ms 36.72 ms 4.852 ms 2.786 ms 24.76 ms 27.25 ms 32.05 ms 29.27 ms
Training RTX 2080ti(2) double 381.9 ms 781.5 ms 971.6 ms 1900. ms 2777. ms 610.6 ms 744.7 ms 948.1 ms 1974. ms 191.9 ms 97.27 ms 3317. ms 3350. ms 4357. ms 4329. ms
Inference RTX 2080ti(2) double 171.8 ms 341.7 ms 449.5 ms 849.5 ms 1231. ms 221.1 ms 275.2 ms 352.5 ms 938.9 ms 83.66 ms 36.48 ms 1715. ms 1721. ms 2294. ms 2289. ms
Training RTX 2080ti(2) half 13.57 ms 22.97 ms 36.55 ms 59.10 ms 83.81 ms 51.74 ms 68.35 ms 81.21 ms 89.46 ms 15.75 ms 35.46 ms 55.28 ms 65.43 ms 75.75 ms 64.62 ms
Inference RTX 2080ti(2) half 3.520 ms 5.837 ms 9.272 ms 14.93 ms 21.13 ms 13.38 ms 18.71 ms 22.40 ms 26.82 ms 4.446 ms 2.406 ms 16.29 ms 17.91 ms 20.90 ms 19.14 ms
  • Results using codes prior to 2020/01/17

contribute

If you want to contribute to the experiment in an additional environment, please contribute to the result by subfolder in fig.