Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this project dead? #322

Closed
PlasmaPower opened this issue Mar 27, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Is this project dead? #322

PlasmaPower opened this issue Mar 27, 2016 · 10 comments
Labels

Comments

@PlasmaPower
Copy link

The pulse for a month shows just one change, a PR was merged to fix a breaking change. Is this project still alive? Is there a fork that is being maintained? supertest-as-promised looks like the way forward, but it doesn't seem to be maintained either.

Anybody have any good alternatives?

@zensh
Copy link

zensh commented Mar 28, 2016

We need a maintainer to deal PRs @mikelax

@nfroidure
Copy link

Imo, if it works and there are no better alternative (i think it is the case right now), there is no reason to change it frequently until there are blocking bugs.

Also, having a quick look at issues makes me think there are a lot of invalid ones.

Since i use it heavily, i'm ok to make some issues/PR triage.

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Author

I've created assert-request as a new promise-based alternative.

@mikelax
Copy link
Contributor

mikelax commented Mar 29, 2016

Hi all. I picked up this project as the previous maintainer and original owner had given up interest.
I have been trying to keep on top of critical bugs, push out a few updates and keep parity with superagent updates.

@nfroidure you are correct. A lot of the issues opened are really questions on usage. I have been trying to move those discussions to the superteset tag at stackoverflow

I can continue to do the same, but I would welcome help for trying to think up a larger roadmap for 2.0 release.

@mikelax
Copy link
Contributor

mikelax commented Mar 29, 2016

I can start a roadmap of things that I think need to be added, upgraded, etc and people can comment and we can use that as a starting point.

@saintedlama
Copy link
Contributor

@mikelax Could help you a bit with bug triage and stuff

@mikelax
Copy link
Contributor

mikelax commented May 26, 2016

@saintedlama if you want to help me with with some PR reviews and help get some PRs identified for 1.3 that would be really useful.

@saintedlama
Copy link
Contributor

@mikelax sorry for my late response - what are your plans for 1.3? I could review PRs and add some "looks fine for 1.3" comment...

@mikelax
Copy link
Contributor

mikelax commented May 13, 2018

New release published, see #474.

@mikelax mikelax closed this as completed May 13, 2018
@rook2pawn
Copy link

@nfroidure @PlasmaPower @mikelax i wrote a ultra-short very readable version of supertest that i call supertest-light. I would love if you could check it out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants