You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently minikube doesn't support LoadBalancer, it doesn't assign to it external IP. And services are supposed to access using minikube service service-name... is uses port mapping and it is quite cumbersome (esp if service exposes more then one port)
It would be nice if minikube could assign "external" IP from some defined pool of addresses, that should be somehow made available from dev host (linux, mac, windows machine) - I'm not a network expert not sure particular way it should be done - but surely it is possible, as it is possible to access 172.x address of docker containers directly.
That would give an ability for more easier access to services/pods without need of port mapping. One could just static records to hosts files and access services via friendly DNS names.
Port mapping is very inconvenient way of accessing containers. For example currently for development I use docker-compose and dnsdock that tracks the containers IP's and labels and allows to access directly them with DNS names.
What do you think about such ability?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FEATURE REQUEST
Currently minikube doesn't support
LoadBalancer
, it doesn't assign to it external IP. And services are supposed to access usingminikube service service-name...
is uses port mapping and it is quite cumbersome (esp if service exposes more then one port)It would be nice if
minikube
could assign "external" IP from some defined pool of addresses, that should be somehow made available from dev host (linux, mac, windows machine) - I'm not a network expert not sure particular way it should be done - but surely it is possible, as it is possible to access 172.x address of docker containers directly.That would give an ability for more easier access to services/pods without need of port mapping. One could just static records to
hosts
files and access services via friendly DNS names.Port mapping is very inconvenient way of accessing containers. For example currently for development I use docker-compose and dnsdock that tracks the containers IP's and labels and allows to access directly them with DNS names.
What do you think about such ability?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: