-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Was 1.6.0 retagged? #2630
Comments
@justinsb gentle ping on this. |
Sorry for delay. It was not deliberately retagged. Checking my logs etc. |
The difference between the tarballs appears to be
|
I'm wondering if this could somehow be related to Homebrew/homebrew-core#13792 (comment). Though I'm not sure how that could be unless there was a retagging. |
So I have the logs from when I published:
So the git tag for 1.6.0 was Sadly shipbot doesn't print the SHAs of the file it uploads (it should, and I'll fix that separately). But I did double-check the SHAs of the two kops executables and they match. |
@ilovezfs I'm a little confused by the linked issue, but here's more head-scratching material:
Here's the problem .. the github release tarball has expanded $Format (the zipfile has the same thing):
I have no idea if that is correct/expected. It is certainly surprising to me. But this would explain how we might not have retagged, but github expansion would change the SHA of the expanded source tarball. BTW Thank you for finding & looking at this! |
@justinsb This seems to be Git magic from the way http://git-memo.readthedocs.io/en/latest/git_archive.html#git-keyword-expansion |
@ilovezfs yes, you're right. I think this means we should probably use (If anyone knows if we can / should do something to "lock them" then let me know!) As this is actually in kubernetes, I'm going to open an issue suggesting this. The project in question should certainly be made aware, and it does help that it is kubernetes/kubernetes :-) |
Since it appears to be the |
I've opened Homebrew/homebrew-core#13935 to update the checksum. |
What is the resolution for this? |
Can we close? |
I don't think the underlying issue has been resolved, so I don't see why it would be closed. |
@justinsb FYI the checksum for 1.7.0 has now changed as well, and I have yet to be able to reconstruct the original, even using the method described here: Homebrew/homebrew-core#18044 (comment). I was able to reconstruct all of the other checksums that had changed as described in that issue, so something is going on here that's different from the others. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Prevent issues from auto-closing with an If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
On May 17, the SHA-256 sum of https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/archive/1.6.0.tar.gz was 39ef8382d7557c4eacf9678feae42f473f2a9c436f4a518dfcf6a630eea6c2ce . As of today, it seems to be 483da291fc5a7a72c151e15ab586e6106f807564894669070705d2e1762e5595 .
Was 1.6.0 retagged? I'm not sure why the checksums would have changed.
Homebrew/Linuxbrew users currently cannot install
kops
from source as a result (see Homebrew/homebrew-core#13900).Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: