Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dynamic cert issue with default-ssl-certificate #3990

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2019
Merged

Fix dynamic cert issue with default-ssl-certificate #3990

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2019

Conversation

ElvinEfendi
Copy link
Member

Looks like when in dynamic cert mode we treat default SSL certificate same as the other certificates and skip storing it in the filesystem. However default SSL certificate needs to be stored on disk even in dynamic cert mode so that we can fallback to it. Even more, when we don't store the certificate, the certificate object won't get PemFileName which means no SSL configuration will be done in the Nginx configuration, not even listening on 443.

The PR fixes the issue and includes a regression test.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #3983

Special notes for your reviewer:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 10, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 10, 2019
@ElvinEfendi ElvinEfendi changed the title [WIP] Fix dynamic cert issue with default-ssl-certificate Fix dynamic cert issue with default-ssl-certificate Apr 10, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 10, 2019
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Apr 10, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf, ElvinEfendi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

default-ssl-certificate not working in 0.24
3 participants