Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Volume Plugin: Quobyte #80

Closed
22 tasks
saad-ali opened this issue Aug 25, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed
22 tasks

New Volume Plugin: Quobyte #80

saad-ali opened this issue Aug 25, 2016 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.
Milestone

Comments

@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

saad-ali commented Aug 25, 2016

Description

Add volume plugin for Quobyte.

Progress Tracker

  • Before Alpha
    • Write and maintain draft quality doc
      • During development keep a doc up-to-date about the desired experience of the feature and how someone can try the feature in its current state. Think of it as the README of your new feature and a skeleton for the docs to be written before the Kubernetes release. Paste link to Google Doc: DOC-LINK
    • Design Approval
      • Design Proposal. This goes under docs/proposals. Doing a proposal as a PR allows line-by-line commenting from community, and creates the basis for later design documentation. Paste link to merged design proposal here: PROPOSAL-NUMBER
      • Initial API review (if API). Maybe same PR as design doc. PR-NUMBER
        • Any code that changes an API (/pkg/apis/...)
        • cc @kubernetes/api
      • Identify shepherd (your SIG lead and/or [email protected] will be able to help you). My Shepherd is: [email protected] (and/or GH Handle)
        • A shepherd is an individual who will help acquaint you with the process of getting your feature into the repo, identify reviewers and provide feedback on the feature. They are not (necessarily) the code reviewer of the feature, or tech lead for the area.
        • The shepherd is not responsible for showing up to Kubernetes-PM meetings and/or communicating if the feature is on-track to make the release goals. That is still your responsibility.
      • Identify secondary/backup contact point. My Secondary Contact Point is: [email protected] (and/or GH Handle)
    • Write (code + tests + docs) then get them merged. ALL-PR-NUMBERS
      • Code needs to be disabled by default. Verified by code OWNERS
      • Minimal testing
      • Minimal docs
        • cc @kubernetes/docs on docs PR
        • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off
        • New apis: Glossary Section Item in the docs repo: kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io
      • Update release notes
  • Before Beta
    • Testing is sufficient for beta
    • User docs with tutorials
      • Updated walkthrough / tutorial in the docs repo: kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io
      • cc @kubernetes/docs on docs PR
      • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off
    • Thorough API review
      • cc @kubernetes/api
  • Before Stable
    • docs/proposals/foo.md moved to docs/design/foo.md
      • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off
    • Soak, load testing
    • detailed user docs and examples
      • cc @kubernetes/docs
      • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off

FEATURE_STATUS is used for feature tracking and to be updated by @kubernetes/feature-reviewers.
FEATURE_STATUS: IN_DEVELOPMENT

More advice:

Design

  • Once you get LGTM from a @kubernetes/feature-reviewers member, you can check this checkbox, and the reviewer will apply the "design-complete" label.

Coding

  • Use as many PRs as you need. Write tests in the same or different PRs, as is convenient for you.
  • As each PR is merged, add a comment to this issue referencing the PRs. Code goes in the https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes repository,
    and sometimes https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib, or other repos.
  • When you are done with the code, apply the "code-complete" label.
  • When the feature has user docs, please add a comment mentioning @kubernetes/feature-reviewers and they will
    check that the code matches the proposed feature and design, and that everything is done, and that there is adequate
    testing. They won't do detailed code review: that already happened when your PRs were reviewed.
    When that is done, you can check this box and the reviewer will apply the "code-complete" label.

Docs

@saad-ali
Copy link
Member Author

@matchstick matchstick added this to the v1.4 milestone Aug 25, 2016
@matchstick matchstick added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label Aug 25, 2016
@matchstick matchstick added beta-in-1.4 sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed beta-in-1.4 sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. labels Aug 25, 2016
@janetkuo
Copy link
Member

janetkuo commented Sep 2, 2016

@rootfs @saad-ali Are the docs ready? Please update the docs in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io, and then add PR numbers and check the docs box in the issue description

@saad-ali since @rootfs doesn't have write access can you help with updating issue description?

@saad-ali
Copy link
Member Author

saad-ali commented Sep 6, 2016

@saad-ali since @rootfs doesn't have write access can you help with updating issue description?

Ack.

@johscheuer @rootfs Can you please ensure the k8s docs get updated to for Quobyte as @janetkuo indicated. See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io/blob/master/docs/user-guide/volumes.md

@johscheuer
Copy link

@saad-ali @janetkuo there is already a PR open to add Quobyte to the volumes docs -> kubernetes/website#1067 but the checks for the release-1.4 branch are failing because of a missing unit test -> kubernetes/website#1159

@saad-ali
Copy link
Member Author

saad-ali commented Sep 8, 2016

@johscheuer Thanks!

@johscheuer
Copy link

@saad-ali is there any further action needed?

@mdelio
Copy link

mdelio commented Jan 23, 2017

Spoke with Saad offline; sounds like this went GA in 1.4. Closing.

@mdelio mdelio closed this as completed Jan 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants