Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capacity Isolation Resource Management #245

Closed
msau42 opened this issue Apr 4, 2017 · 13 comments
Closed

Capacity Isolation Resource Management #245

msau42 opened this issue Apr 4, 2017 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status
Milestone

Comments

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Apr 4, 2017

Feature Description

  • One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): This feature adds capacity isolation support for local storage at node, container, and volume levels.
  • Primary contact (assignee): @vishh @jingxu97
  • Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests
  • Design proposal link (community repo): [Proposal] Improve Local Storage Management community#306
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred: @derekwaynecarr, @vishh, @dashpole
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs): @thockin, @vishh, @derekwaynecarr
  • Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (x.y): 1.7/1.8
    • Beta release target (x.y): 1.9
    • Stable release target (x.y): 1.10
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Apr 4, 2017

/assign @jingxu97 @vishh

@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Apr 4, 2017

cc @kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests

@davidopp
Copy link
Member

davidopp commented Apr 5, 2017

cc/ @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-feature-requests

@vishh vishh added this to the v1.7 milestone Apr 26, 2017
@grodrigues3 grodrigues3 added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label May 1, 2017
@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@msau42 @vishh @jingxu97 I've updated the feature description to fit the new template. Please, fill the empty fields in the new template (their actual state was unclear).

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. label May 3, 2017
@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@msau42 @vishh @jingxu97 please, update the feature description, fields "Approver" and "Feature target" are still unclear.

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status and removed help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. labels Jun 13, 2017
@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@vishh @jingxu97 please, provide us with the docs PR link (and update the features tracking spreadsheet with it).
/cc @kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests

@saad-ali saad-ali modified the milestones: 1.8, 1.7 Jul 12, 2017
@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

@jingxu97 @vishh For 1.8 is alpha still correct?

@jingxu97
Copy link
Contributor

I think currently we keep it alpha. We need to finish a number of items lists in #43607

@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

@jingxu97 will split this feature issue in to three or more separate feature issues so that it is easier to track.

@jingxu97
Copy link
Contributor

I plan to split this into three features as follows

  • Supports storage as one of the node allocatable resources.
  • Support local storage isolation at pod and container levels.
  • Expose storage usage metrics to end users.

@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@jingxu97 @saad-ali have these features been splitted? If yes, please provide us with the links to the new features; and close the current one.

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jul 25, 2017
@jingxu97
Copy link
Contributor

I opened up feature #361 #362 #363 to replace this one.

@andyxning
Copy link
Member

/subscribe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants