-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove skip login option #2672
Comments
Our company would like to see this feature implemented since we use several clusters across different teams and we would like to disable even read-only access to some clusters. |
Enforcing a read-only mode for unauthenticated users may be useful, but is unnecessary as this can be modelled easily with proper RBAC rules. However, under very restrictive rules (i.e. no permissions at all), the SKIP button is useless, so an option to disable it would improve the user experience. |
@jessfraz @liggitt @floreks I would like to restart our discussion here as we still have this issue in our backlog and its priority is critical. What do you think about making a new release as soon as possible to include the current fix in it (#3289) and waiting with completely removing the skip option until the migration finish (#3152)? I would say that it should take around a month to get migration on master and to start work on this issue. Would it be okay for you or you think that the current solution is not enough and we should focus on it right now? What would be your requirements for it then? |
I think we should not wait and remove the skip option immediately. Making this project secure should always be highest priority. |
Because googling my problem landed in this bug report for the top result: If you want to keep the skip login button, you need to edit the yaml file to include |
Sad to see that such a breaking change was done in a minor release and that it was originally not even in the changelog. |
@joekohlsdorf It was in the changelog from the beginning but it was not so prominent and obvious. You would need to check linked issues.
|
As per request from #2668 (comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: