Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] Podman roadmap to stable #1778

Open
2 of 4 tasks
aojea opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 13 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

[EPIC] Podman roadmap to stable #1778

aojea opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/provider/podman Issues or PRs related to podman kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@aojea
Copy link
Contributor

aojea commented Aug 12, 2020

Podman roadmap to stable

Currently, Podman provider is set as Experimental, mainly because of subtle differences with Docker that breaks some of the features.

To fix this, KIND implements an interface, so providers can diverge in their implementation maintaining its compatibility at the user level.

In order to move to stable the provider it has to have exactly the same capabilities that the Docker provider.

These are the work items I have identified:

@aojea aojea added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 12, 2020
@aojea
Copy link
Contributor Author

aojea commented Aug 12, 2020

/area provider/podman
/cc @amwat

For those interested please report the missing features that you find

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/podman Issues or PRs related to podman label Aug 12, 2020
@aojea
Copy link
Contributor Author

aojea commented Aug 12, 2020

/assign

@aojea aojea changed the title Podman roadmap to stable [EPIC] Podman roadmap to stable Aug 12, 2020
@amwat
Copy link
Contributor

amwat commented Aug 13, 2020

This looks great!
Also we should definitely try to see if we can get those github actions running upstream.
thoughts @BenTheElder ?

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

I'm in favor of this.

@aojea aojea mentioned this issue Aug 13, 2020
@BenTheElder BenTheElder added this to the 2020 goals milestone Aug 20, 2020
@BenTheElder BenTheElder added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Aug 26, 2020
@afbjorklund
Copy link
Contributor

afbjorklund commented Sep 12, 2020

Windows, Mac support (I do not know if this is even possible)

It is possible, but you would have to manage the VM yourself since podman only supports a "remote" and not a integrated solution

There are also lots of question marks when it comes to port mapping and such, so thinking of dropping the feature from minikube:

kubernetes/minikube#8003

Right now we are pinning 1.9.3, due to the 2.0.x bugs

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

BenTheElder commented Sep 14, 2020

I don't think we should worry about windows / Mac for now.

We're supporting 2.X in kind 0.9

@afbjorklund
Copy link
Contributor

afbjorklund commented Sep 14, 2020

Our issues with podman 2.x was mostly about podman-remote

The podman driver (for minikube) is more or less back now,
but we will probably support both of them for a while (2020)

We are hoping that most of the worst regressions are fixed in 2.1 2.2

@aojea
Copy link
Contributor Author

aojea commented Oct 26, 2020

here we go containers/podman#8143

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 24, 2021
@aojea
Copy link
Contributor Author

aojea commented Jan 24, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 24, 2021
@afbjorklund
Copy link
Contributor

afbjorklund commented Jan 24, 2021

I have added a similar story for minikube, we are hoping for podman v3....

kubernetes/minikube#10237

@BenTheElder BenTheElder removed this from the 2020 goals milestone Jan 25, 2021
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

I expect revamped image loading to land in v0.11.0 (just started the cycle for that), I'm not sure we should block on windows / mac support.

We also have some limited CI for podman now, which is good.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 25, 2021
@aojea
Copy link
Contributor Author

aojea commented Apr 25, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 25, 2021
@kubernetes-sigs kubernetes-sigs deleted a comment from fejta-bot Apr 27, 2021
@BenTheElder BenTheElder added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Apr 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/podman Issues or PRs related to podman kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants