-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Display for conformance profiles results #2550
Comments
seeing as there are no strong opinions from the meetings/on this issue, will work on a poc and present to the group 👍 |
Thank you for taking this one on! Let us know if you run into any trouble, or need any help! 🖖 |
thanks @shaneutt! currently been exploring the use of |
I for one am not opposed, my co-maintainers @youngnick and @robscott can chime in if they have thoughts 💭 |
Hey @xtineskim, I've never seen k8s use it, but that looks promising to me, worth a shot. |
Would this necessitate switching to a different static site generator, or would it be possible to integrate with the existing MkDocs configuration somehow? MkDocs appears to use the Python Markdown library with some support for extensions that might be helpful (I'm not sure if we may face any restrictions on allowed third party extensions similar to the GitHub Pages Jekyll static site generator) but from a cursory glance I haven't noticed a way to integrate alternative Markdown processing libraries... |
@mikemorris ah good point, thanks for linking the resource 👍 i'll tal into that :) |
@xtineskim how are things going with this? |
@shaneutt been experimenting with different plugins - none have really satisfied the needs of having a requirements. But i'll have a PR open soon (hopefully this week, sorry, been busy!) to have a basic md table (sortable by columns), and we can iterate from there! |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
I think given #2874 we can consider this one resolved. We can always open new issues for new UI improvements as well. |
As discussed in the Gateway API meeting, post Kubecon NA 2023, there will be an implementations reorganization by profiles. Since it seems open ended, wanted to open an issue to see what folks would like to be captured.
Data displayed will be pulled from the conformance reports, how to display it meaningfully for an end-user trying to decide on which implementation suits their requirements
Some things that come to mind:
HTTPRouteMethodMatching
), category of implementations (L7, L4, Mesh), maybe stats of passing/failings/skipped tests?Some questions:
This is open for suggestions, please leave any thoughts/questions/feedback
Related issues:
#1709
Related discussion:
#2577
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: