Skip to content

Conversation

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add calls for the new lifecycle hooks introduced by #12878

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Rif #12720

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Oct 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 23, 2025
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/area runtime-sdk

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/runtime-sdk Issues or PRs related to Runtime SDK and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Oct 23, 2025
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the call-new-chained-upgrade-lifecyclehooks branch from c20add8 to 4991eba Compare October 23, 2025 19:59
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the call-new-chained-upgrade-lifecyclehooks branch from 4991eba to 84b90cf Compare October 28, 2025 13:03
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini changed the title [WIP] ✨ Call new lifecycle hooks for chained-upgrades ✨ Call new lifecycle hooks for chained-upgrades Oct 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 28, 2025
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the call-new-chained-upgrade-lifecyclehooks branch from 3950c9d to 308cf1b Compare October 30, 2025 17:37
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Oct 30, 2025
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thank you very much!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 455418b467b3fef014e59a00ff4f277f257832c3

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 31, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 45159ff into kubernetes-sigs:main Oct 31, 2025
18 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.12 milestone Oct 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/runtime-sdk Issues or PRs related to Runtime SDK cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants