Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 21, 2019. It is now read-only.

[Federation] Follow up items on federated pod autoscaling #25

Closed
irfanurrehman opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

[Federation] Follow up items on federated pod autoscaling #25

irfanurrehman opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/federation lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to sig-multicluster.

Comments

@irfanurrehman
Copy link
Contributor

Issue by irfanurrehman
Wednesday Jul 26, 2017 at 16:16 GMT
Originally opened as kubernetes/kubernetes#49644


The original issuse for feature federated pod autoscaler is here, and the feature is being tracked here. This issue is to track and follow up pending items from the first phase of implementation especially items chosen to defer in the first phase of implementation here.

1 - Make the replica nums offered (both min and max) and in turn increased or reduced from an existing cluster local hpa, configurable. Right now the value is kept to a pessimistic low of 1 at a time.
2 - Optimise the algorithm such that if there are clusters which need the replicas, they can first be taken from those clusters that have capacity to offer more.
3 - Implement hard limit based min/max preferences per cluster from the user.
4 - Contemplate usage of weighted distribution of replicas based on the weights applied on per cluster hpas by the user.

@irfanurrehman irfanurrehman added area/federation priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to sig-multicluster. labels Oct 30, 2017
@irfanurrehman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comment by irfanurrehman
Wednesday Jul 26, 2017 at 16:17 GMT


/sig federation
/assign

@irfanurrehman
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @irfanurrehman

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 24, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 23, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area/federation lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to sig-multicluster.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants