Fix syntax highlighting for output in sublime text 4

[kdevkr]

syntax highlighting error for temporal data in sublime text 4.

Solution: Copy code from q.tmLanuage to q_output.tmLanguage.

<!-- timestamp (12) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>timestamp</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.timestamp.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<!-- For convenience, here are the disallowed chars: 1st group: DT, 2nd group: eTisDdfhjzbmc -->
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))([0-9]{4}\.[0-9]{2}\.[0-9]{2}D[0-9]{2}(:[0-5][0-9]){0,2}(\.[0-9]{3}([a-zA-CE-SU-Z0-9]*[ABCEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZagklnopqrtuvwxy0-9])?|\.[0-9]*|:)?)(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- datetime (15) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>datetime</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.datetime.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<!-- For convenience, here are the disallowed chars: 1st group: D, 2nd group: eTisDdfhjzbmc -->
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))([0-9]{4}\.[0-9]{2}\.[0-9]{2}T[0-9]{2}(:[0-5][0-9]){0,2}(\.[0-9]{3}([a-zA-CE-Z0-9]*[ABCEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZagklnopqrtuvwxy0-9])?|\.[0-9]*|:)?)(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- timespan (16) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>datetime and timespan</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.timespan.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<!-- For convenience, here are the disallowed chars: 1st group: eisdfhjzbm, 2nd group: eTisDdfhjzbmc -->
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))(([0-9]{1,6}D([0-9]{1,2})((:[0-5][0-9]){0,2}|:)(\.[0-9]{0,9}[a-zA-Z0-9]*[A-Zacgklnopqrtuvwxy0-9])?)|([0-9]{2}:[0-5][0-9](:[0-5][0-9]\.[0-9]{4,}|:[0-5][0-9]\.[0-9]{9,}[a-zA-Z0-9]*[ABCEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZagklnopqrtuvwxy0-9])|\.[0-9]{8,}))(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- time (19) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>time</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.time.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<!-- For convenience, here are the disallowed chars: eTisDdfhjzbm -->
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))([0-9]{2}:[0-5][0-9]((:[0-9]{2}(((([ABCEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZacgklnopqrtuvwxy0-9:]){1,2})?([0-5][0-9]){1,2})|\.[0-9]{3}[ABCEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZacgklnopqrtuvwxy0-9]?|\.[0-9]{0,3}))|\.[0-9]{4,7}))(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- second (18) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>second</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.second.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))([0-9]{2}:[0-5][0-9]([0-5][0-9]([0-5][0-9])?|\.[0-9]{2}|:[0-9]{2}|([a-zA-Z]){0,2}[0-5][0-9]))(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- minute (17) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>minute</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.minute.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<!-- For convenience, here are the disallowed chars: eTisDdfhjzbm -->
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))([0-9]{2}:([0-5][0-9]([ABCEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZacgklnopqrtuvwxy0-9:])?)?)(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- date (14) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>date</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.date.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))([0-9]{4}\.[0-9]{2}\.[0-9]{2})(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- month (13) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>month</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.month.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<string>(?=(\W|\b))([0-9]{4,}\.([0][1-9]|[1][0-2])m)(?=(\W|\b))</string>
</dict>
<!-- boolean (binary) (1), byte (4), short (5), int (6), long (7), float (9) -->
<dict>
	<key>comment</key>
	<string>boolean, byte, short, int, long, float</string>
	<key>name</key>
	<string>constant.numeric.complex.q</string>
	<key>match</key>
	<string>((?&lt;=(\W))|(?&lt;=_)|(?&lt;=\b))([-]?[0-9]+[bhijf]?(\.[0-9]+[m]?)?|0x[a-fA-F0-9]+)(?=(\W|\b)|_)</string>
</dict>

Output:

[komsit37]

Sorry for late reply. Looks good. Can you send pull request with the change?

[komsit37]

#33