Skip to content

Conversation

@mattdangerw
Copy link
Member

Because of our version comparisons we were not actually running keras saving on nightly CI.

This was masking a separate bug where we were not passing save_format as a kwarg to model.save in the roberta classifier test.

@mattdangerw mattdangerw force-pushed the fix-roberta-saving-test branch 3 times, most recently from 52ef32e to 093dbef Compare January 28, 2023 01:43
Because of our version comparisons we were not actually running keras
saving on nightly CI.

This was masking a separate bug where we were not passing `save_format`
as a kwarg to `model.save` in the roberta classifier test.
@mattdangerw mattdangerw force-pushed the fix-roberta-saving-test branch from 093dbef to c1e97fd Compare January 28, 2023 02:22
@mattdangerw
Copy link
Member Author

Very interesting, we are facing another issue here, that seems totally core Keras related, where the "new style" Keras testing will only pass on python 3.9. Something related to custom object scope __enter__ in the Keras saving utilities.

I'm pretty sure we want to keep support python 3.8 to stay in lock step with TF (is that right @sampathweb ?). I'll bump our nightly testing to 3.9 for now, and follow up with Francois and Rick on this next week.

@mattdangerw mattdangerw merged commit c21f852 into keras-team:master Jan 28, 2023
mattdangerw added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2023
Because of our version comparisons we were not actually running keras
saving on nightly CI.

This was masking a separate bug where we were not passing `save_format`
as a kwarg to `model.save` in the roberta classifier test.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants