Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LFT Term 3]: The checksum check of the three-party dependencies #394

Open
zong-zhe opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 12 comments
Open

[LFT Term 3]: The checksum check of the three-party dependencies #394

zong-zhe opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 12 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zong-zhe
Copy link
Contributor

Enhancement

The checksum verification of the dependencies in kpm has not been completed, and this part needs to be redesigned and completed.

PreTest

A paper work

  • A technical proposal for common package management tools checksum checking such as cargo, npm, go. mainly includes:
    • The main purpose of checking checksum
    • Related to the checksum check function
    • To implement the checksum check, which parts need to finished
    • Combined with kpm, which functions of kpm need to add checksum
    • For the existing kpm dependencies, we need a solution that does not break compatibility for starting this feature
@zong-zhe zong-zhe added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 23, 2024
@zong-zhe zong-zhe changed the title The checksum check of the three-party dependencies [LFT Term 3]The checksum check of the three-party dependencies Jul 23, 2024
@zong-zhe zong-zhe changed the title [LFT Term 3]The checksum check of the three-party dependencies [LFT Term 3]: The checksum check of the three-party dependencies Jul 24, 2024
@anshjain16
Copy link

hey i would wish to work on this issue under lfx mentorship, are there any prerequisites or any tasks that i need to complete for the issue

@varshith257
Copy link

Hey @zong-zhe @AkashKumar7902 . Any communication channels to connect with you. I started on pretest mentioned. It will be great to connect with community too.

@AkashKumar7902
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @varshith257 👋
You can connect with us on the slack channel. https://github.com/kcl-lang/community

@Peefy
Copy link
Contributor

Peefy commented Jul 26, 2024

The pretest for this issue provides a detailed and accurate solution that can guide implementation, and open a PR for this design doc. Good luck! ❤️

Besides, you can always contact community members through any channel.

@HitanshuPrasad
Copy link

Looking forward to making contributions for the Fall term and possibly completing pre -test with some guidance (if needed ) :)
Thanks1

@kairveeehh
Copy link

kairveeehh commented Jul 31, 2024

hewyy @Peefy is the issue still open to be worked over?
@AkashKumar7902 @zong-zhe

@NishantBansal2003
Copy link
Contributor

NishantBansal2003 commented Aug 2, 2024

Hi @zong-zhe,
Should I create a pull request for the proposal using a markdown file or a docx/pdf file?
Thank you.

@ravjot07
Copy link

ravjot07 commented Aug 4, 2024

Hello everyone! I'm excited to join this community and am looking forward to making contributions for the Fall term. I'm currently working on a pre-test. I'd appreciate any guidance or suggestions you can offer to help me navigate and contribute effectively. Thanks!

@zong-zhe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @NishantBansal2003 @varshith257 @Gmin2 😄

I need these information from you until Aug 13 5:00 PM PDT

@NishantBansal2003
Copy link
Contributor

I need these information from you until Aug 13 5:00 PM PDT

@Gmin2
Copy link
Contributor

Gmin2 commented Aug 13, 2024

Full name: Mintu Gogoi
Email Address: [email protected]
Github: https://github.com/Gmin2

@varshith257
Copy link

@zong-zhe

Full Name: Vamshi Maskuri
Email: [email protected]
GitHub : https://github.com/varshith257

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

10 participants