From 6afc6dfb75b3581d056cf128068e3dbf1fe19846 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: egg Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:36:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] docs(#3393): document shipped multi-repo pipeline model Snapshot the multi-repo model in the two current-state docs: - docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md gains a Multi-Repo Pipelines section: list-shaped submission (per-repo base_branch), the primary-repo concept, and the uniform-visibility / uniform-auth submission rules. - docs/architecture/slice-dag.md gains a Slice.repo row in the New Slice fields table and a Per-slice repo section covering the 1:1 rule + runtime resolver, owner/repo-keyed worktree map, per-repo work branch + context PR, per-slice PR routing, cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies, the two-tier merge-sequencing hold, and per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 --- docs/architecture/slice-dag.md | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md | 58 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 175 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/architecture/slice-dag.md b/docs/architecture/slice-dag.md index 8f0e0a2223..5320909a2a 100644 --- a/docs/architecture/slice-dag.md +++ b/docs/architecture/slice-dag.md @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ pass either. | Field | Type | Default | Purpose | |-------|------|---------|---------| +| `repo` | `str \| None` | `None` | The single repository this slice operates in, `owner/name`-shaped (#3393). **Slice ↔ repo is 1:1** — exactly one repo per slice. `None` ⇒ resolved to the pipeline's primary repo at runtime by `resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)` in `orchestrator/models.py` (the contract model cannot see the pipeline, so the default is *not* filled in by the model). See [Per-slice repo](#per-slice-repo-multi-repo-pipelines). | | `serialized_chain_order` | `list[str]` | `[]` | Architect-emitted ordering for would-be multi-parent slices (#2809). When the architect identifies a slice that would naturally have >1 parents, it serialises the upstream cluster into a chain and records the chosen order on the downstream slice. | | `parent_branch_at_creation` | `str \| None` | `None` | Git branch the slice's integration branch was forked off when its worktree was provisioned. Eager-persisted under the per-pipeline state lock in the same contract write that flips `SliceStatus.PENDING → IN_PROGRESS` ([#2777](https://github.com/jwbron/egg/issues/2777)), so Layer-C bootstrap reconciliation has a single signal that distinguishes a fresh slice from an interrupted one and the value is durable across orchestrator restarts. Read by the stacked-PR reconciler when the parent's branch has been deleted by a merge so it can compute the correct rebase target. Empty on legacy/orphaned slices that pre-date the eager-persist contract — in that case `_resolve_slice_base_branch` falls back to a merge-base probe against the dependency-derived parent before routing onto `pipeline_branch`. | | `integration_base_sha` | `str \| None` | `None` | Origin SHA the slice's integration branch was forked at when first created (#2871). Written right after branch creation and before any agent is spawned (so the tip still equals this SHA at that point), but can be overwritten by out-of-band actors such as `restart_phase`, `salvage_agent_commits`, or manual contract edits. Lets `is_slice_branch_merged_into_parent` distinguish an *empty, un-started* branch (tip still equals this SHA → trivially an ancestor of any advanced parent, but not merged work) from a *genuinely merged* one (tip has moved past this SHA). Also used by `create_slice_integration_branch` to verify that an existing integration branch is a resumable additive fork (#2947); when this field is absent or corrupted (e.g. overwritten to the advanced parent tip by a restart actor), that method re-derives the fork point via a runtime `git merge-base` (executed on the gateway) and adopts the branch in place rather than non-fast-forward-failing the slice (#3245). Slices provisioned before this field existed fall back to the prior ancestor-only check. | @@ -719,6 +720,122 @@ synthetic agent session: no general-purpose privileged gh-command surface is introduced — the route accepts only `repo`/`limit` and constructs the fixed read-only argv server-side. +## Per-slice repo (multi-repo pipelines) + +A pipeline can coordinate PRs across an **arbitrary number of repositories** +(#3393). The repo set is list-shaped end to end — `Pipeline.repos: +list[RepoSpec]`, one entry per repo, each pinning its own `base_branch`. There +is no two-repo special case and no primary+secondary shape in the data model; +nothing may assume `len(repos)` ∈ {1, 2}. See the +[SDLC Pipeline Guide § Multi-Repo Pipelines](../guides/sdlc-pipeline.md#multi-repo-pipelines) +for the submission surface, the primary-repo concept, and the uniform-visibility +/ uniform-auth rules enforced at submission time. + +The slice DAG is where cross-repo coordination lives. Each slice maps to +**exactly one** repo, and cross-repo work is expressed as **multiple slices with +dependencies** — never a single slice touching two repos. + +### `Slice.repo` — the 1:1 rule + +`Slice.repo` (`str | None`, `owner/name`-shaped) names the one repository a +slice operates in. **Slice ↔ repo is 1:1**: a slice's work, worktree, branch, +review diff, test scope, and PR all live in that single repo. This keeps +worktree selection, PR routing, reviewer diffs, and test gating single-repo at +the slice level — the coordination complexity lives only in the slice DAG. + +`Slice.repo` defaults to `None`. The absent ⇒ primary default is resolved at +**runtime** by `resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)` (orchestrator layer), which +returns `slice.repo` when set else `pipeline.primary_repo`. The contract model +holds no repo list and cannot see the pipeline, so the default is deliberately +*not* a model-side migration. Adding the optional field bumped the contract +`schemaVersion` to `1.4` via a **pure additive after-stamp** +(`_migrate_schema_version_to_1_4`, mirroring the `1.3` precedent): a persisted +pre-1.4 contract loads cleanly and `Slice.repo` stays `None` — no field is +filled by the migration. + +### Owner/repo-keyed worktree map + +The gateway's `create_worktrees(repos=[...])` already returns a +`repo → worktree path` map; that map is keyed by the **full `owner/repo` slug** +(not the bare short name) so two repos with the same short name under different +owners stay distinct. The full map is exposed to the agent environment as +`EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS` — a JSON object of `owner/repo → container worktree path` — +so a per-slice agent can select the worktree for *its* slice's repo rather than +being collapsed onto the primary. Naming-oriented env (`EGG_PIPELINE_REPO`, +`EGG_REPO_PATH`) still resolves to the primary for back-compat. + +### Per-repo work branch & context PR + +Work branches and context PRs are **lazy-per-repo**: every repo that owns ≥1 +slice gets its own `egg//work` branch and its own context PR +(`egg//work → `); a submitted repo that ends up +with no slices gets neither. A single-repo pipeline gets exactly one work branch +and one context PR, byte-equivalent to the pre-multi-repo path. Context-PR +bodies cross-reference their sibling context PRs in the pipeline. + +### Per-slice PR routing + +`GatewayClient.create_slice_pr` is repo-parameterized; the run loop passes each +slice's resolved repo (`resolve_slice_repo`, falling back to the primary when +`Slice.repo` is absent), so a slice's PR opens in that slice's repo against that +repo's `egg//work` context branch. Slice-PR bodies render **sibling +cross-references** — the other pipeline PRs (repo + number) and, for a dependent +slice, the upstream slice's PR it is ordered behind. + +### Cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies + +A cross-repo dependency is an ordinary slice `dependencies` edge whose two +endpoints resolve to different repos: an edge `B → A` is cross-repo iff +`resolve_slice_repo(A) != resolve_slice_repo(B)`. The canonical case — add a new +schema version in repo A, then migrate the consumer in repo B, where B's cutover +can't land until A's PR merges — is expressed as slice B depending on slice A, +with A in repo A and B in repo B. **Dependencies gate merge-readiness, not +development**: B is developed in parallel with A; only B's PR ready-state waits. + +### Cross-repo merge-sequencing hold (two-tier) + +`orchestrator/cross_repo_merge_gate.py` implements the two-tier hold that +sequences a cross-repo dependent PR behind its upstream. It is pure logic over +injected gateway-read/write and HITL callables, driven on the existing +stacked-PR reconciler cadence. + +- **Tier A — automated merge-state hold (default).** The dependent slice's PR + opens as a **draft** while the upstream PR is unmerged. A bounded poll watches + the upstream PR's merge state and, on merge, auto-marks the dependent PR ready + via the `mark_pr_ready(repo, pr_number)` gateway verb (wrapping `gh pr + ready`). **Merge detection keys off the PR `mergedAt` / merged boolean, not + head-SHA equality** — a squash or rebase merge produces a merge-commit SHA ≠ + the PR head, so SHA-equality would misfire. Two failure terminals fall through + to a HITL hold rather than hanging: an upstream that reaches + **CLOSED-not-merged**, and a poll that exceeds its **attempt bound** (a + never-merging upstream). Both surface on pipeline status. +- **Tier B — HITL beyond-merge-state hold (opt-in).** For an edge the plan (or + task description) marks with a beyond-merge-state condition — a + release/publish of the upstream repo, a version-pin choice, or a genuine + cannot-continue development block — the dependent PR is held and released + **only by a HITL decision**, never by programmatic detection. Absent that + marker, a cross-repo edge defaults to the Tier-A automated hold. + +All HITL holds (Tier B, plus the two Tier-A failure terminals) route through the +same decision-queue mechanism and share a single release path. + +### Per-repo gate, diff & convention scoping + +Because slice ↔ repo is 1:1, the implement-phase gates scope naturally to the +slice's repo: + +- The **test gate** runs in the slice's repo worktree only (resolved from the + `owner/repo`-keyed worktree map). +- The **reviewer diff** is `git diff` in that worktree against **that repo's** + base branch. +- The slice agent's **cwd** is the slice's repo worktree, and check/lint + commands resolve from **that repo's** conventions — its own `CLAUDE.md`, + linters, and check commands. egg's `make lint` / `make test` apply only to + slices whose repo is egg. + +A slice whose repo is egg (the common case) behaves exactly as a single-repo +pipeline does today. + ## Architect, planner & plan-reviewer prompts The dynamic prompt builders for `task_planner` and `reviewer_plan` teach diff --git a/docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md b/docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md index e8a13ff91c..8bbdb3721b 100644 --- a/docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md +++ b/docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md @@ -425,6 +425,64 @@ The terminal "PR phase" as a separate pipeline stage was **deleted** in [#2777]( This structural enforcement prevents incidents where agents push code during planning or manually create PRs before implementation is complete. +## Multi-Repo Pipelines + +A pipeline can coordinate PRs across an **arbitrary number of repositories** in +a single run. The submission surface, pipeline state, agent environment, and PR +coordination are all list-shaped end to end — there is no two-repo special case +and no "primary + one secondary" shape baked into the data model. + +### List-shaped submission + +Both submission entry points accept a **list** of repositories, each pinning its +own base branch: + +- **MCP `submit_task`** accepts either a single `repo` + `base_branch` + (back-compat) or a list of `{repo, base_branch}` entries. +- **`POST /api/v1/pipelines`** threads the full list through pipeline + construction into `Pipeline.repos: list[RepoSpec]` (each `RepoSpec` carries a + `repo` in `owner/name` form and its own optional `base_branch`; when a + `base_branch` is `None` it is auto-detected from that repo's default branch). + +A bare single-repo submission is trivially a one-element list, so single-repo +(N=1) pipelines behave exactly as before. Nothing downstream may assume +`len(repos)` ∈ {1, 2}. + +### Primary repo + +One repo in the list is the **primary** — the first entry unless another is +explicitly flagged. The primary is used for pipeline naming and as the +slice-default repo (a slice that does not name its own repo resolves to the +primary). Code reads the primary through the `Pipeline.primary_repo` property +(not `repos[0]`), and resolves a slice's effective repo through +`resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)` — which returns `slice.repo` when set, +else `pipeline.primary_repo`. + +### Uniform visibility and uniform auth + +Private mode is a **pipeline-wide posture** (context filtering, egress rules, +what may be referenced where), so every repo in a single run must be uniformly +private or uniformly public — a mixed set would let content from a private repo +flow through shared plan/contract/PR surfaces into a public one. The submission +path validates two uniformity rules and rejects a non-uniform set with an +actionable, repo-naming error: + +- **Uniform visibility** — all repos private or all public, checked via + `gateway/repo_visibility.py:get_repo_visibility(owner, repo)`. Indeterminate + visibility fails closed (the run is rejected rather than assumed public). +- **Uniform auth mode** — a single auth mode across the run, checked via the + per-repo `get_auth_mode(repo)` credential lookup. + +Same-name repos under **different owners** are *not* rejected — the collision is +resolved by keying the repo→worktree map on the full `owner/repo` slug (see the +[Slice-DAG architecture doc](../architecture/slice-dag.md#per-slice-repo-multi-repo-pipelines)). +Different runs can, of course, be on different sides of the public/private line. + +For the slice-level model — the `Slice.repo` 1:1 rule, per-repo work branch and +context PR, cross-repo ordering through slice dependencies, the two-tier +merge-sequencing hold, and per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping — see +[Per-slice repo (multi-repo pipelines)](../architecture/slice-dag.md#per-slice-repo-multi-repo-pipelines). + ## Contract System ### Directory Structure From 4553fd01279f55939a0159b2d4d78a8e8df9676a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: egg Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:54:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Slice-6 (#3393): scope test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd to slice.repo (task-6-1) Thread the slice's repo, worktree, and base branch through the per-slice team spawn (_run_concurrent_phase) so the tester's configured checks, the reviewer diff, and the agent cwd all resolve from the slice's repo rather than the pipeline primary. New _resolve_slice_worktree_path helper mirrors the slice-3 owner/repo worktree layout. Gated on len(pipeline.repos) > 1 so single-repo (egg) pipelines are byte-identical to today. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 --- .../coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md | 73 +++++++++++ orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py | 120 +++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md b/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md index 5c6c6300a7..3918c71467 100644 --- a/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md +++ b/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md @@ -1,5 +1,78 @@ # Coder BRC memory — issue-3393 (multi-repo pipelines) +## Slice-6 — per-repo test-gate + reviewer-diff scoping + per-repo conventions + +**Branch:** `egg/issue-3393-slice-6-coder/work` +**Task:** task-6-1 — implemented. **File:** `orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py` only. + +### Change model (what landed) +All wiring is in `_run_concurrent_phase` (the per-slice team spawn driver, +receives `slice_id`, `pipeline`, `worktree_repo_path`, `repos`, +`repo_volumes`). The implement-phase test gate and reviewer diff both run +INSIDE the agent containers (tester's configured checks; reviewers' +`git diff origin/...HEAD`) — there is NO orchestrator-side +`make test`/`make lint` subprocess in pipelines.py (grep confirmed: only +prompt/doc strings). So scoping = threading the slice's repo / worktree / +base-branch into the prompt builder + spawn, not moving a subprocess. + +- **New helper `_resolve_slice_worktree_path(pipeline, slice_repo, fallback)`** + (beside `_resolve_pipeline_worktree_path`): returns + `WORKTREE_BASE_DIR/pipeline.id/` if it exists, else + fallback (pipeline-primary worktree). Mirrors the existing per-repo + worktree layout (slice-3 owner/repo keying). +- **Slice-repo scoping block** in `_run_concurrent_phase`, GATED on + `slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1` (so N=1 skips it entirely — no + extra contract read, byte-identical): loads the contract, finds the + slice, `resolved = resolve_slice_repo(slice_obj, pipeline)`. Only when + `resolved != pipeline.repo` does it diverge — sets `slice_repo`, + `slice_repo_path` (via the new helper), `slice_base_branch` (from the + matching `RepoSpec.base_branch`), and `slice_repos = [resolved, *others]`. + Contract-load failure soft-degrades to the primary (logged, non-blocking). +- **Base-branch resolution** now prefers `slice_base_branch or + pipeline.base_branch`, then auto-detects in `slice_repo_path`. +- **`_build_agent_prompt`** now gets `repo=slice_repo`, + `repo_path=str(slice_repo_path)` (was `pipeline.repo` / + `worktree_repo_path`). This is the lever for AC "check/lint from the + slice repo's conventions": `get_repo_checks(repo)` (tester prompt + ~15963) + file-boundary `get_agent_pattern_for_repo(repo)` both key off + `repo`; the reviewer diff base flows via `base_branch`. +- **`create_concurrent_spawn_fn`** now gets `repos=slice_repos`. Verified + `_spawn.py:460` derives `primary_repo = next(iter(repos))` → + `repo_path`/`EGG_REPO_PATH` (agent cwd) from the first repo, so + slice-first ordering sets cwd to the slice's repo worktree. `repo_volumes` + (full owner/repo map, slice-3) is passed unchanged. + +### N=1 byte-equivalence +`len(pipeline.repos) <= 1` ⇒ scoping block skipped ⇒ `slice_repo == +pipeline.repo`, `slice_repo_path == worktree_repo_path`, `slice_repos == +repos`, `slice_base_branch == None` ⇒ base resolution + prompt + spawn +identical to pre-change. The legacy slice-1 validator synthesises a +one-element `repos` for any legacy pipeline, so the guard holds. + +### Documented boundary (preempt reviewer questions) +- **cwd via repos-reorder, not a new spawner param:** task-6-1 files=only + pipelines.py, and `_spawn.py` already derives cwd from `repos[0]`; + reordering is the minimal, in-scope lever. For a secondary-repo slice + `EGG_PIPELINE_REPO` becomes the slice repo — correct under slice↔repo 1:1 + (authorship + naming should follow the slice's repo). `EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS` + (full map) still exported from `repo_volumes`, unchanged. +- **`_build_slice_diff_summary` (PR-body "What's in this PR") NOT rescoped:** + it's PR rendering (best-effort, soft-fails), not the reviewer's audit + diff or the test gate, and its parent/integration branches are already + per-slice. Left on the pipeline worktree; multi-repo PR-body diff is + gated on task-7-1 (secondary worktrees) anyway. +- **Runtime multi-repo end-to-end depends on task-7-1** (secondary-repo + worktree/branch materialisation → populates `repo_volumes` with the + secondary + creates the on-disk worktree the helper resolves). This slice + is structurally complete + forward-compatible: once task-7-1 lands, a + secondary slice's team spawns in its own repo worktree with NO further + change here. + +### Validation (no venv — deps cert-blocked, same as slices 2/3/4) +- `py_compile` clean; `ruff check` "All checks passed!" on pipelines.py. +- Full pytest deferred to the tester (task-6-2/6-3): env can't `pip install` + (charset-normalizer fetch fails on UnknownIssuer cert). + ## Slice-4 — slice-PR routing to slice.repo + lazy per-repo context PR **Branch:** `egg/issue-3393-slice-4-coder/work` (base = slice-3 tip aa567fa67) diff --git a/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py b/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py index 3afc9537df..f2459e9560 100644 --- a/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py +++ b/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py @@ -10601,6 +10601,29 @@ def _resolve_pipeline_worktree_path(pipeline: Pipeline, fallback: Path) -> Path: return fallback +def _resolve_slice_worktree_path( + pipeline: Pipeline, slice_repo: str | None, fallback: Path +) -> Path: + """Resolve the on-disk worktree path for a slice's repo (#3393 task-6-1). + + A multi-repo pipeline materialises one worktree per participating repo + under ``WORKTREE_BASE_DIR / pipeline.id / `` — the same + owner/repo-keyed layout as :func:`_resolve_pipeline_worktree_path`, one + directory per repo. Given a slice's resolved repo (``owner/name``), this + returns that repo's worktree when it exists on disk, else *fallback* + (the pipeline-primary worktree). For an N=1 pipeline the slice's repo IS + the primary, so ``slice_repo`` matches ``pipeline.repo`` and the answer + is byte-identical to the pipeline-primary worktree — callers therefore + only reach here for a genuine secondary-repo slice. + """ + repo_short = slice_repo.split("/")[-1] if slice_repo else None + if repo_short: + candidate = WORKTREE_BASE_DIR / pipeline.id / repo_short + if candidate.exists(): + return candidate + return fallback + + def _persist_phase_brc_history( pipeline: Pipeline, store: StateStore, @@ -20729,11 +20752,87 @@ def _run_concurrent_phase( ] filtered_graph = ReviewGraph(filtered_edges) - # Resolve base branch for diff commands in agent prompts. - _resolved_base_branch = pipeline.base_branch + # Scope the per-slice team to the slice's repo (#3393 task-6-1). + # + # Every slice maps to exactly one repo (slice ↔ repo, 1:1). For a + # multi-repo pipeline the slice's work, worktree, test gate, reviewer + # diff and PR all live in ITS repo — not necessarily the pipeline + # primary. We resolve the slice's repo via ``resolve_slice_repo`` and + # thread the slice-scoped repo / worktree / base-branch into the agent + # prompts (which drive ``get_repo_checks`` for the tester's configured + # checks, the file-boundary patterns, and the reviewer's + # ``git diff origin/...HEAD``) and the spawn (via ``base_branch`` + # → ``EGG_BASE_BRANCH`` and a slice-primary-first ``repos`` ordering so + # the spawner sets the agent cwd / ``EGG_REPO_PATH`` to the slice's + # repo worktree). + # + # N=1 stays byte-identical: a single-repo pipeline has one RepoSpec, so + # the block below is skipped entirely (``len(pipeline.repos) <= 1``), + # leaving ``slice_repo == pipeline.repo``, ``worktree_repo_path``, and + # the pipeline base branch exactly as before — no extra contract read. + slice_repo = pipeline.repo + slice_repo_path = worktree_repo_path + slice_repos = repos + slice_base_branch: str | None = None + if slice_id and len(getattr(pipeline, "repos", None) or []) > 1: + try: + from models import resolve_slice_repo # type: ignore[no-redef] + except ImportError: + from ..models import resolve_slice_repo # type: ignore[no-redef] + + from egg_contracts.loader import load_contract + + slice_obj = None + try: + _contract = load_contract(pipeline_id, worktree_repo_path) + slice_obj = next( + (s for s in _contract.slices if s.id == slice_id), None + ) + except Exception as contract_err: # noqa: BLE001 + # Best-effort: a contract load/parse failure degrades to the + # pipeline-primary repo (today's behaviour), it does not block + # the spawn. The slice still runs, just against the primary. + logger.warning( + "Slice-repo scoping: contract load failed; using pipeline " + "primary repo (#3393)", + pipeline_id=pipeline_id, + slice_id=slice_id, + error=str(contract_err), + ) + + resolved = resolve_slice_repo(slice_obj, pipeline) if slice_obj else None + if resolved and resolved != pipeline.repo: + slice_repo = resolved + slice_repo_path = _resolve_slice_worktree_path( + pipeline, resolved, worktree_repo_path + ) + # Per-repo base branch from the pipeline's RepoSpec list. + for spec in pipeline.repos or []: + if getattr(spec, "repo", None) == resolved: + slice_base_branch = getattr(spec, "base_branch", None) + break + # Order the slice's repo first so the spawner treats it as the + # effective repo for this per-slice team (cwd / EGG_REPO_PATH). + # ``repo_volumes`` already carries every repo owner/repo-keyed + # (slice-3), so only the ordering changes here. + slice_repos = [resolved, *[r for r in repos if r != resolved]] + logger.info( + "Slice scoped to secondary repo (#3393 task-6-1)", + pipeline_id=pipeline_id, + slice_id=slice_id, + slice_repo=slice_repo, + slice_worktree=str(slice_repo_path), + ) + + # Resolve base branch for diff commands in agent prompts. Prefer the + # slice repo's own base (its RepoSpec.base_branch) over the pipeline + # singleton, then fall back to auto-detecting the default branch in the + # slice's worktree (#3393 task-6-1). For N=1 this is the pipeline base / + # pipeline worktree exactly as before. + _resolved_base_branch = slice_base_branch or pipeline.base_branch if not _resolved_base_branch: try: - _resolved_base_branch = get_default_branch(worktree_repo_path) + _resolved_base_branch = get_default_branch(slice_repo_path) except Exception: _resolved_base_branch = None @@ -20752,10 +20851,15 @@ def _run_concurrent_phase( pipeline_mode=pipeline_mode, prompt=pipeline.prompt, issue_number=pipeline.issue_number, - repo=pipeline.repo, + # Slice-scoped repo / worktree (#3393 task-6-1): drives the + # tester's ``get_repo_checks`` (per-repo configured checks), + # the role file-boundary patterns, and the reviewer diff base — + # all resolve from the slice's repo, not the pipeline primary. + # N=1 ⇒ these equal ``pipeline.repo`` / ``worktree_repo_path``. + repo=slice_repo, branch=pipeline.branch, base_branch=_resolved_base_branch, - repo_path=str(worktree_repo_path), + repo_path=str(slice_repo_path), concurrent=True, review_feedback=review_feedback, network_mode=gateway_mode, @@ -20770,7 +20874,11 @@ def _run_concurrent_phase( issue_number=pipeline.issue_number, repo_volumes=repo_volumes, mode=gateway_mode, - repos=repos, + # Slice's repo first (#3393 task-6-1): the spawner derives the agent + # cwd / EGG_REPO_PATH from the primary (first) repo, so ordering the + # slice's repo first sets the working directory to that repo's + # worktree. N=1 / primary-repo slices leave ``repos`` unchanged. + repos=slice_repos, phase=phase_str, sandbox_env=sandbox_env, certs_volume=certs_volume, From 3db72777eb7ac5a2861d2fff4cabf82a31cd270a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: egg Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:54:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] test(#3393): slice-6 per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping tests (task-6-2) Add always-green model-level rule tests plus a real resolve_worktree_path per-repo-subdir test and a skip-guarded coder-seam integration test, pinning that the implement-phase test gate, reviewer diff, and check/lint commands scope to the slice's own repo (rulings #3/#5) with the egg/N=1 baseline unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 --- orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py | 317 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 317 insertions(+) diff --git a/orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py b/orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py index ecda7caccd..0b9dfe0e65 100644 --- a/orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py +++ b/orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py @@ -992,3 +992,320 @@ def test_keep_verdict_does_not_ready_the_pr(self): def test_unresolved_hold_keeps_waiting(self): readied, _ = self._run_hold_then_verdict(verdict=None) assert readied == [] + + +# ============================================================================ +# Slice-6 (#3393): per-repo test-gate + reviewer-diff scoping + per-repo +# conventions (task-6-3 tests; operator rulings #3, #5). +# +# The implement-phase gates must be scoped to the *slice's* repo, not the +# pipeline primary: the test gate runs in the slice's repo worktree; the +# reviewer diff is ``git diff`` in that worktree against *that repo's* base +# branch; and check / lint commands resolve from the slice's repo conventions +# (its own ``CLAUDE.md`` / linters) rather than hard-coding egg's ``make +# lint`` / ``make test``. An egg-repo slice (the N=1 common case) must behave +# exactly as today. +# +# Same two-layer shape as slices 2/4/5: +# +# * **Always-green rule tests** built on the slice-1 model API +# (``resolve_slice_repo`` / ``primary_repo`` / ``Pipeline.repos``) and the +# already-shipped ``resolve_worktree_path`` per-repo worktree resolver. These +# pin the exact contract the slice-6 coder change must satisfy — which repo +# each gate is scoped to — so they are meaningful before the coder half +# integrates and never spuriously red. +# * **Skip-guarded integration test** on the coder-owned scoping seam +# (``routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo``), handed to the coder via a +# task-6-1 gap so the two halves converge on the same shape. It skips with an +# explicit reason until the parallel coder producer lands, then activates at +# convergence. +# ============================================================================ + + +def _expected_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) -> str | None: + """The repo an implement-phase gate for ``slice`` is scoped to (rulings #3/#5). + + The test gate's worktree, the reviewer diff's repo, and the check/lint + command conventions all key off the *single* repo the slice operates in — + ``resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)`` — never the pipeline primary (unless + the slice itself resolves to the primary). This is the one invariant every + slice-6 gate-scoping site must honour. + """ + return resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline) + + +def _expected_diff_base(slice, pipeline) -> str | None: + """The base branch the reviewer diff for ``slice`` is computed against. + + Per operator ruling #3 the diff is ``git diff`` in the slice's repo + worktree against *that repo's* base — i.e. the ``base_branch`` of the + ``RepoSpec`` for ``resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)``, which for a + cross-repo slice differs from the primary's base. Falls back to the + pipeline's legacy ``base_branch`` when the resolved repo is not in the + ``repos`` list (belt-and-braces; the validator keeps them in sync). + """ + repo = resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline) + for spec in pipeline.repos: + if spec.repo == repo: + return spec.base_branch + return pipeline.base_branch + + +def _resolve_checks_for_slice(slice, pipeline, checks_by_repo) -> list: + """Spec mirror: a slice's check/lint commands come from its OWN repo. + + ``checks_by_repo`` stands in for the per-repo convention source + (``get_repo_checks(repo)`` in the orchestrator): the commands a slice runs + are those registered for ``resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)``, so an + egg slice gets egg's ``make lint`` / ``make test`` and a consumer-repo + slice gets the consumer repo's own checks — never a cross-wired set. + """ + return checks_by_repo.get(resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline), []) + + +class TestPerRepoTestGateScoping: + """The test gate runs in the *slice's* repo worktree, not the primary (AC-1).""" + + @staticmethod + def _pipeline() -> Pipeline: + return Pipeline( + id="issue-3393", + repos=[ + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/schema", base_branch="main"), # primary + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/consumer", base_branch="develop"), + ], + ) + + def test_gate_scopes_to_slice_repo_not_primary(self): + pipeline = self._pipeline() + s = Slice(id="slice-2", name="consumer migration", repo="jwbron/consumer") + assert _expected_gate_repo(s, pipeline) == "jwbron/consumer" + # The whole point of slice-6: the secondary slice's gate must NOT run + # against the primary. + assert _expected_gate_repo(s, pipeline) != pipeline.primary_repo + + def test_repoless_slice_gate_scopes_to_primary(self): + pipeline = self._pipeline() + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="schema add") # repo is None → primary + assert s.repo is None + assert _expected_gate_repo(s, pipeline) == "jwbron/schema" + + def test_each_slice_gate_scopes_to_its_own_repo(self): + pipeline = self._pipeline() + slices = [ + Slice(id="slice-1", name="schema", repo="jwbron/schema"), + Slice(id="slice-2", name="consumer", repo="jwbron/consumer"), + ] + assert [_expected_gate_repo(s, pipeline) for s in slices] == [ + "jwbron/schema", + "jwbron/consumer", + ] + + def test_egg_slice_in_multi_repo_pipeline_scopes_to_egg(self): + """An egg slice keeps egg's gate even alongside other repos (baseline).""" + pipeline = Pipeline( + id="issue-3393", + repos=[ + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/egg", base_branch="main"), + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/consumer", base_branch="develop"), + ], + ) + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="egg change", repo="jwbron/egg") + assert _expected_gate_repo(s, pipeline) == "jwbron/egg" + + def test_n1_gate_scopes_to_single_repo(self): + """N=1 (bare single-repo) behaviour is identical to today.""" + pipeline = Pipeline(id="issue-3393", repo="jwbron/egg", base_branch="main") + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="only") + assert _expected_gate_repo(s, pipeline) == "jwbron/egg" + + +class TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase: + """The reviewer diff is scoped to the slice's repo base branch (AC-1).""" + + @staticmethod + def _pipeline() -> Pipeline: + return Pipeline( + id="issue-3393", + repos=[ + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/schema", base_branch="main"), # primary + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/consumer", base_branch="develop"), + ], + ) + + def test_diff_base_is_slice_repo_base_not_primary(self): + pipeline = self._pipeline() + s = Slice(id="slice-2", name="consumer migration", repo="jwbron/consumer") + # The consumer repo's base is ``develop``; the primary's is ``main``. + assert _expected_diff_base(s, pipeline) == "develop" + assert _expected_diff_base(s, pipeline) != pipeline.base_branch + + def test_repoless_slice_diff_base_is_primary_base(self): + pipeline = self._pipeline() + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="schema add") + assert _expected_diff_base(s, pipeline) == "main" + + def test_each_slice_diffs_against_its_own_repo_base(self): + pipeline = self._pipeline() + slices = [ + Slice(id="slice-1", name="schema", repo="jwbron/schema"), + Slice(id="slice-2", name="consumer", repo="jwbron/consumer"), + ] + assert [_expected_diff_base(s, pipeline) for s in slices] == ["main", "develop"] + + def test_n1_diff_base_unchanged(self): + pipeline = Pipeline(id="issue-3393", repo="jwbron/egg", base_branch="release-1.0") + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="only") + assert _expected_diff_base(s, pipeline) == "release-1.0" + + +class TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution: + """Check / lint commands resolve from the slice's repo conventions (AC-2).""" + + @staticmethod + def _checks_by_repo() -> dict: + return { + "jwbron/egg": [{"name": "lint", "command": "make lint"}], + "jwbron/consumer": [{"name": "ci", "command": "npm test"}], + } + + def test_check_commands_resolve_from_slice_repo(self): + pipeline = Pipeline( + id="issue-3393", + repos=[ + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/egg", base_branch="main"), + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/consumer", base_branch="develop"), + ], + ) + s = Slice(id="slice-2", name="consumer migration", repo="jwbron/consumer") + # The consumer slice gets the consumer repo's checks, NOT egg's make lint. + assert _resolve_checks_for_slice(s, pipeline, self._checks_by_repo()) == [ + {"name": "ci", "command": "npm test"} + ] + + def test_egg_slice_check_commands_match_baseline(self): + pipeline = Pipeline( + id="issue-3393", + repos=[ + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/egg", base_branch="main"), + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/consumer", base_branch="develop"), + ], + ) + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="egg change", repo="jwbron/egg") + assert _resolve_checks_for_slice(s, pipeline, self._checks_by_repo()) == [ + {"name": "lint", "command": "make lint"} + ] + + def test_n1_check_commands_from_single_repo(self): + pipeline = Pipeline(id="issue-3393", repo="jwbron/egg", base_branch="main") + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="only") # repo None → primary egg + assert _resolve_checks_for_slice(s, pipeline, self._checks_by_repo()) == [ + {"name": "lint", "command": "make lint"} + ] + + +# --- Real per-repo worktree resolver ---------------------------------------- +# +# ``resolve_worktree_path(pipeline_id, repo_path)`` already selects the worktree +# by the repo directory name, so the slice-6 test gate runs in the slice's repo +# worktree iff its call site passes the *slice's* repo path. These tests pin +# that the resolver picks the slice's own per-repo subdir (not the primary's) +# when handed the slice's repo path — the mechanism the coder wires the gate +# onto. Guarded because importing ``routes`` pulls in the Flask surface; the +# ``sys.path`` / ``docker`` bootstrap ran in the slice-4 block above. + +_RESOLVE_WORKTREE_IMPORT_ERROR: str | None = None +try: # pragma: no cover - exercised via skip path in stripped environments + import routes as _routes_pkg + from routes import resolve_worktree_path as _resolve_worktree_path +except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001 + _routes_pkg = None # type: ignore[assignment] + _resolve_worktree_path = None # type: ignore[assignment] + _RESOLVE_WORKTREE_IMPORT_ERROR = repr(exc) + + +@pytest.mark.skipif( + _resolve_worktree_path is None, + reason=( + "routes.resolve_worktree_path import failed (Flask surface unavailable): " + f"{_RESOLVE_WORKTREE_IMPORT_ERROR}" + ), +) +class TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection: + """The worktree resolver selects the slice's own per-repo subdir (AC-1).""" + + def test_slice_worktree_is_own_repo_subdir_not_primary(self, tmp_path, monkeypatch): + pid = "issue-3393" + wt_dir = tmp_path / pid + (wt_dir / "schema").mkdir(parents=True) # primary repo worktree + (wt_dir / "consumer").mkdir(parents=True) # secondary repo worktree + monkeypatch.setattr(_routes_pkg, "_WORKTREE_BASE_DIR", tmp_path) + + # Handed the consumer slice's repo path, the resolver returns the + # consumer worktree — not the primary's. + consumer_wt = _resolve_worktree_path(pid, _Path("/home/egg/repos/consumer")) + primary_wt = _resolve_worktree_path(pid, _Path("/home/egg/repos/schema")) + assert consumer_wt == wt_dir / "consumer" + assert primary_wt == wt_dir / "schema" + assert consumer_wt != primary_wt + + def test_n1_worktree_resolves_to_single_repo(self, tmp_path, monkeypatch): + pid = "issue-3393" + wt_dir = tmp_path / pid + (wt_dir / "egg").mkdir(parents=True) + monkeypatch.setattr(_routes_pkg, "_WORKTREE_BASE_DIR", tmp_path) + assert _resolve_worktree_path(pid, _Path("/home/egg/repos/egg")) == wt_dir / "egg" + + +# --- Coder-owned scoping seam: skip until the slice-6 coder change integrates - +# +# Handed to the coder via a task-6-1 gap: a single scoping accessor +# ``routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) -> str | None`` +# that returns the repo every implement-phase gate for the slice is scoped to +# (== ``resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)``). Skips with an explicit reason +# until the parallel coder producer lands, then activates at convergence. + +_GATE_REPO_IMPORT_ERROR: str | None = None +try: # pragma: no cover - exercised via skip path until coder lands + from routes.pipelines import _resolve_slice_gate_repo # type: ignore[attr-defined] +except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001 + _resolve_slice_gate_repo = None # type: ignore[assignment] + _GATE_REPO_IMPORT_ERROR = repr(exc) + + +@pytest.mark.skipif( + _resolve_slice_gate_repo is None, + reason=( + "slice-6 coder helper ``routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo`` not " + "yet integrated into the tester worktree (parallel producer); activates " + f"at convergence. import error: {_GATE_REPO_IMPORT_ERROR}" + ), +) +class TestSliceGateRepoAccessor: + """The coder's gate-scoping accessor matches the rule (AC-1/AC-2/AC-3).""" + + def test_accessor_matches_rule_for_multi_repo(self): + pipeline = Pipeline( + id="issue-3393", + repos=[ + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/schema", base_branch="main"), + RepoSpec(repo="jwbron/consumer", base_branch="develop"), + ], + ) + secondary = Slice(id="slice-2", name="consumer", repo="jwbron/consumer") + repoless = Slice(id="slice-1", name="schema") + assert ( + _resolve_slice_gate_repo(secondary, pipeline) + == _expected_gate_repo(secondary, pipeline) + == "jwbron/consumer" + ) + assert ( + _resolve_slice_gate_repo(repoless, pipeline) + == _expected_gate_repo(repoless, pipeline) + == "jwbron/schema" + ) + + def test_accessor_n1_single_repo(self): + pipeline = Pipeline(id="issue-3393", repo="jwbron/egg", base_branch="main") + s = Slice(id="slice-1", name="only") + assert _resolve_slice_gate_repo(s, pipeline) == "jwbron/egg" From 996d3cb1bd45bb4bef13ac135ae683bc761de1ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: egg Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:57:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Slice-6 (#3393): add _resolve_slice_gate_repo accessor (converge w/ tester task-6-2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Single source of truth for slice→gate-repo resolution, matching the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface. Used inside the per-slice scoping block in _run_concurrent_phase. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 --- .../coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md | 11 ++++++++ orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py | 27 ++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md b/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md index 3918c71467..1d7b2ab2ea 100644 --- a/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md +++ b/.egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md @@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ base-branch into the prompt builder + spawn, not moving a subprocess. slice-first ordering sets cwd to the slice's repo worktree. `repo_volumes` (full owner/repo map, slice-3) is passed unchanged. +### Converged with tester task-6-2 (commit 3db72777e) +Tester pinned a required coder-owned accessor via a task-6-1 gap: +`routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) -> str | None` +== `resolve_slice_repo(slice, pipeline)` (their `TestSliceGateRepoAccessor` +skips until it exists, then activates). Added it as the single gate-repo +source of truth and use it inside the scoping block. Their +`TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection` validates the existing +`routes.resolve_worktree_path` selects the slice's per-repo subdir — my +`_resolve_slice_worktree_path` is the functionally-equivalent +WORKTREE_BASE_DIR/pid/ lookup used at the call site. + ### N=1 byte-equivalence `len(pipeline.repos) <= 1` ⇒ scoping block skipped ⇒ `slice_repo == pipeline.repo`, `slice_repo_path == worktree_repo_path`, `slice_repos == diff --git a/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py b/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py index f2459e9560..ae4236bb04 100644 --- a/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py +++ b/orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py @@ -10601,6 +10601,24 @@ def _resolve_pipeline_worktree_path(pipeline: Pipeline, fallback: Path) -> Path: return fallback +def _resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice_obj, pipeline: Pipeline) -> str | None: + """The repo every implement-phase gate for *slice_obj* is scoped to (#3393). + + Single source of truth for slice → gate-repo resolution (task-6-1): the + test gate, the reviewer diff base, the per-repo check/lint commands, and + the slice agent's cwd all key off this one accessor. It is exactly + :func:`models.resolve_slice_repo` — the slice's own ``repo`` when set, + else the pipeline's primary repo (so a repoless slice, or any slice in an + N=1 pipeline, scopes to the single/primary repo). Returns ``None`` only + for a genuinely repoless pipeline (test scaffolds with no repo at all). + """ + try: + from models import resolve_slice_repo # type: ignore[no-redef] + except ImportError: + from ..models import resolve_slice_repo # type: ignore[no-redef] + return resolve_slice_repo(slice_obj, pipeline) + + def _resolve_slice_worktree_path( pipeline: Pipeline, slice_repo: str | None, fallback: Path ) -> Path: @@ -20775,11 +20793,6 @@ def _run_concurrent_phase( slice_repos = repos slice_base_branch: str | None = None if slice_id and len(getattr(pipeline, "repos", None) or []) > 1: - try: - from models import resolve_slice_repo # type: ignore[no-redef] - except ImportError: - from ..models import resolve_slice_repo # type: ignore[no-redef] - from egg_contracts.loader import load_contract slice_obj = None @@ -20800,7 +20813,9 @@ def _run_concurrent_phase( error=str(contract_err), ) - resolved = resolve_slice_repo(slice_obj, pipeline) if slice_obj else None + # Single gate-repo accessor (shared with the tester's task-6-2 + # TestSliceGateRepoAccessor): the repo the whole slice team scopes to. + resolved = _resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice_obj, pipeline) if slice_obj else None if resolved and resolved != pipeline.repo: slice_repo = resolved slice_repo_path = _resolve_slice_worktree_path( From e38c2a93b86bb18d99193ff8c427befccbcfa1bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: egg-orchestrator Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 19:02:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Persist BRC history for slice-6 (#2548) --- .../brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.json | 1475 +++++++++++++++++ .../brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.md | 1423 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 2898 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.json create mode 100644 .egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.md diff --git a/.egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.json b/.egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3956ced32d --- /dev/null +++ b/.egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.json @@ -0,0 +1,1475 @@ +[ + { + "id": "c175a84e-8064-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=propose (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:33:13.315982+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "ea4810bc-83e4-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=propose (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:33:13.327523+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "27697764-8377-4d", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "documenter", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=propose (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:33:14.340676+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "9bc04f98-098f-43", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:33:19.846799+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "cee975b0-ba6f-41", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:33:21.810990+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "49f90c8d-2be5-49", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "documenter", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:33:22.417679+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "bfacfcf8-5e10-40", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "documenter", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:35:30.185494+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "51369776-e23f-48", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:35:35.964271+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "fc842ce0-e5d1-4f", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:35:39.101490+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "3d2a4331-115a-4d", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "documenter", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_PROPOSE", + "subject": "Proposal from documenter", + "body": "Documented the shipped multi-repo pipeline model across the two current-state docs (task-6-3). docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md gains a \"Multi-Repo Pipelines\" section: list-shaped submission via submit_task / POST /api/v1/pipelines with per-repo base_branch (RepoSpec), the primary-repo concept (Pipeline.primary_repo, resolve_slice_repo), and the uniform-visibility + uniform-auth submission-time rules (get_repo_visibility fail-closed, get_auth_mode; same-name-different-owner allowed). docs/architecture/slice-dag.md gains a Slice.repo row in the New Slice fields table plus a \"Per-slice repo (multi-repo pipelines)\" section covering: the 1:1 slice\u2194repo rule + runtime resolver + schemaVersion 1.4 additive stamp; owner/repo-keyed worktree map (EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS); lazy per-repo work branch + context PR; per-slice PR routing with sibling cross-references; cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies (B\u2192A cross-repo iff resolve_slice_repo differs); the two-tier cq-1 merge-sequencing hold (Tier A automated draft\u2192ready on mergedAt not head-SHA, mark_pr_ready, CLOSED-unmerged + bounded-timeout HITL terminals; Tier B beyond-merge-state HITL opt-in); and per-repo test-gate/reviewer-diff/convention scoping. Current-state snapshot, no slice-number or pipeline-process narration; bidirectional cross-links between the two docs.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "summary": "Documented the shipped multi-repo pipeline model across the two current-state docs (task-6-3). docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md gains a \"Multi-Repo Pipelines\" section: list-shaped submission via submit_task / POST /api/v1/pipelines with per-repo base_branch (RepoSpec), the primary-repo concept (Pipeline.primary_repo, resolve_slice_repo), and the uniform-visibility + uniform-auth submission-time rules (get_repo_visibility fail-closed, get_auth_mode; same-name-different-owner allowed). docs/architecture/slice-dag.md gains a Slice.repo row in the New Slice fields table plus a \"Per-slice repo (multi-repo pipelines)\" section covering: the 1:1 slice\u2194repo rule + runtime resolver + schemaVersion 1.4 additive stamp; owner/repo-keyed worktree map (EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS); lazy per-repo work branch + context PR; per-slice PR routing with sibling cross-references; cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies (B\u2192A cross-repo iff resolve_slice_repo differs); the two-tier cq-1 merge-sequencing hold (Tier A automated draft\u2192ready on mergedAt not head-SHA, mark_pr_ready, CLOSED-unmerged + bounded-timeout HITL terminals; Tier B beyond-merge-state HITL opt-in); and per-repo test-gate/reviewer-diff/convention scoping. Current-state snapshot, no slice-number or pipeline-process narration; bidirectional cross-links between the two docs.", + "attestation": {}, + "artifacts": [ + "docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md", + "docs/architecture/slice-dag.md" + ], + "risk_considered": "Docs-only change (documenter file boundary: docs/ + **/*.md). No code/behavior change. Verified every documented symbol against the landed implementation (Slice.repo + schemaVersion 1.4 in shared/egg_contracts/models.py; RepoSpec/Pipeline.repos/primary_repo/resolve_slice_repo in orchestrator/models.py; EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS in kubernetes_spawner/_spawn.py; mark_pr_ready in gateway_client/_pr.py; cross_repo_merge_gate.py two-tier hold). Anchors verified consistent across both docs.", + "commit_sha": "6afc6dfb75b3581d056cf128068e3dbf1fe19846", + "files_changed": [ + "docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md", + "docs/architecture/slice-dag.md" + ], + "tests_run": [], + "tasks_satisfied": [ + "task-6-3" + ], + "no_changes_needed": false, + "no_changes_reason": "" + }, + "version": 1, + "commit_sha": "6afc6dfb75b3581d056cf128068e3dbf1fe19846", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:36:40.871413+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "c609056b-8ef4-43", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:36:49.197953+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "737acca0-73ac-49", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:36:49.668745+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "48575b44-0ba9-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "documenter", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=135475 util=0.14 cache_hit=0.99 decision=no_warm_session", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:36:55.190603+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "bbd8e37f-62ed-4f", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:36:58.205757+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "ec23e71f-8c65-40", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:36:58.722634+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "46b6eeec-6ea1-4d", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:37:42.693803+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "da7dfca4-bbff-48", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:37:49.128733+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a5fe14a2-d55c-4e", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "documenter", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_code for documenter", + "body": "Verified every concrete anchor in the docs diff against live code \u2014 all accurate and non-misleading. resolve_slice_repo (models.py:1484 returns slice.repo or pipeline.primary_repo), Pipeline.repos:list[RepoSpec] + primary_repo property, Slice.repo optional field with schema 1.4 additive _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4, cross_repo_merge_gate.py (draft-PR Tier-A hold; merge detection via mergedAt/merged NOT head-SHA per _is_merged; CLOSED-not-merged + attempt-bound HITL terminals), mark_pr_ready gateway verb, create_slice_pr repo-parameterized, gateway/repo_visibility.py:get_repo_visibility, and EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS owner/repo-keyed worktree map with naming env falling back to primary. Cross-file doc anchors resolve. No blocking issues.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md", + "docs/architecture/slice-dag.md" + ], + "reason": "Verified every concrete anchor in the docs diff against live code \u2014 all accurate and non-misleading. resolve_slice_repo (models.py:1484 returns slice.repo or pipeline.primary_repo), Pipeline.repos:list[RepoSpec] + primary_repo property, Slice.repo optional field with schema 1.4 additive _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4, cross_repo_merge_gate.py (draft-PR Tier-A hold; merge detection via mergedAt/merged NOT head-SHA per _is_merged; CLOSED-not-merged + attempt-bound HITL terminals), mark_pr_ready gateway verb, create_slice_pr repo-parameterized, gateway/repo_visibility.py:get_repo_visibility, and EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS owner/repo-keyed worktree map with naming env falling back to primary. Cross-file doc anchors resolve. No blocking issues.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:37:57.646633+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "3f67c7c0-eed1-42", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=66003 util=0.07 cache_hit=0.96 decision=no_warm_session", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:38:06.146246+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "38c2ced7-c301-4d", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "documenter", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_contract for documenter", + "body": "ACK task-6-3 (docs snapshot of shipped multi-repo model). Both acceptance criteria met: (1) sdlc-pipeline.md documents list-shaped submission (MCP submit_task + POST /api/v1/pipelines, per-repo base_branch), the uniform-visibility + uniform-auth rules, and the primary-repo concept; (2) slice-dag.md documents Slice.repo (1:1 rule), per-repo work-branch/context-PR, cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies, the two-tier merge-sequencing hold, and per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping \u2014 as a current-state snapshot. Verified every code claim resolves to shipped symbols (resolve_slice_repo, Pipeline.primary_repo, RepoSpec/Pipeline.repos, _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4\u2192schemaVersion 1.4, EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS + back-compat EGG_PIPELINE_REPO/EGG_REPO_PATH, cross_repo_merge_gate.py/mark_pr_ready, create_slice_pr, _assert_repo_set_uniform + get_repo_visibility/get_auth_mode). New sections contain no prohibited slice-N/task-N narration (only standard #3393 issue cites). Snapshot is faithful.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md", + "docs/architecture/slice-dag.md" + ], + "reason": "ACK task-6-3 (docs snapshot of shipped multi-repo model). Both acceptance criteria met: (1) sdlc-pipeline.md documents list-shaped submission (MCP submit_task + POST /api/v1/pipelines, per-repo base_branch), the uniform-visibility + uniform-auth rules, and the primary-repo concept; (2) slice-dag.md documents Slice.repo (1:1 rule), per-repo work-branch/context-PR, cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies, the two-tier merge-sequencing hold, and per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping \u2014 as a current-state snapshot. Verified every code claim resolves to shipped symbols (resolve_slice_repo, Pipeline.primary_repo, RepoSpec/Pipeline.repos, _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4\u2192schemaVersion 1.4, EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS + back-compat EGG_PIPELINE_REPO/EGG_REPO_PATH, cross_repo_merge_gate.py/mark_pr_ready, create_slice_pr, _assert_repo_set_uniform + get_repo_visibility/get_auth_mode). New sections contain no prohibited slice-N/task-N narration (only standard #3393 issue cites). Snapshot is faithful.", + "ack_version": 1, + "attestation": { + "tasks_verified": [ + "task-6-3" + ], + "snapshot_accuracy": "verified against shipped code (resolve_slice_repo, primary_repo, RepoSpec, schemaVersion 1.4 additive after-stamp, EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS + back-compat env, cross_repo_merge_gate/mark_pr_ready, create_slice_pr, uniform visibility+auth validation)", + "no_slice_task_narration": true + } + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:38:47.125620+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a5679d28-302d-44", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=72801 util=0.07 cache_hit=0.99 decision=no_warm_session", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:38:56.376867+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "cc8e41bf-aa24-42", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:39:55.031636+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a92fc394-1da9-4e", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:39:56.200189+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "d2371efd-ba54-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:42:42.076235+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "ba41bf1b-d32a-42", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:42:42.059931+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "82c40eaf-75df-41", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:55:37.174061+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a33b3eb3-3ae9-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:55:44.090828+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "d4346bbb-df3a-4e", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_PROPOSE", + "subject": "Proposal from coder", + "body": "Slice-6 task-6-1: scope the implement-phase test gate, reviewer diff, per-repo check/lint commands, and agent cwd to the slice's repo (slice \u2194 repo 1:1). All wiring lands in `_run_concurrent_phase` (per-slice team spawn driver) in orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py. There is NO orchestrator-side `make test`/`make lint` subprocess (grep-confirmed) \u2014 the test gate is the tester agent's configured checks and the reviewer diff is the reviewers' in-worktree `git diff origin/...HEAD`; both are scoped by threading the slice's repo/worktree/base into the prompt builder + spawn. Changes: (1) `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline)` \u2014 the single gate-repo source of truth (== resolve_slice_repo), matching the tester's pinned task-6-2 TestSliceGateRepoAccessor; (2) `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` helper (WORKTREE_BASE_DIR/pipeline.id/, mirrors slice-3 owner/repo layout); (3) a scoping block gated on `slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1` that loads the contract, resolves the slice's repo via the accessor, and \u2014 only when it differs from the primary \u2014 sets slice_repo, slice_repo_path, per-repo base (from the matching RepoSpec), and reorders `repos` slice-first; (4) `_build_agent_prompt` gets repo=slice_repo + repo_path=slice_repo_path (drives get_repo_checks for per-repo commands, file-boundary patterns, reviewer diff base); (5) `create_concurrent_spawn_fn` gets repos=slice_repos \u2014 `_spawn.py:460` derives cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH from next(iter(repos)), so slice-first ordering sets the agent cwd to the slice's repo worktree. N=1 (egg) is byte-identical: block skipped for \u22641-repo pipelines, no extra contract read. Contract-load failure soft-degrades to primary. Merged tester task-6-2 tests (3db72777e) + documenter docs (6afc6dfb7).", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "summary": "Slice-6 task-6-1: scope the implement-phase test gate, reviewer diff, per-repo check/lint commands, and agent cwd to the slice's repo (slice \u2194 repo 1:1). All wiring lands in `_run_concurrent_phase` (per-slice team spawn driver) in orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py. There is NO orchestrator-side `make test`/`make lint` subprocess (grep-confirmed) \u2014 the test gate is the tester agent's configured checks and the reviewer diff is the reviewers' in-worktree `git diff origin/...HEAD`; both are scoped by threading the slice's repo/worktree/base into the prompt builder + spawn. Changes: (1) `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline)` \u2014 the single gate-repo source of truth (== resolve_slice_repo), matching the tester's pinned task-6-2 TestSliceGateRepoAccessor; (2) `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` helper (WORKTREE_BASE_DIR/pipeline.id/, mirrors slice-3 owner/repo layout); (3) a scoping block gated on `slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1` that loads the contract, resolves the slice's repo via the accessor, and \u2014 only when it differs from the primary \u2014 sets slice_repo, slice_repo_path, per-repo base (from the matching RepoSpec), and reorders `repos` slice-first; (4) `_build_agent_prompt` gets repo=slice_repo + repo_path=slice_repo_path (drives get_repo_checks for per-repo commands, file-boundary patterns, reviewer diff base); (5) `create_concurrent_spawn_fn` gets repos=slice_repos \u2014 `_spawn.py:460` derives cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH from next(iter(repos)), so slice-first ordering sets the agent cwd to the slice's repo worktree. N=1 (egg) is byte-identical: block skipped for \u22641-repo pipelines, no extra contract read. Contract-load failure soft-degrades to primary. Merged tester task-6-2 tests (3db72777e) + documenter docs (6afc6dfb7).", + "attestation": {}, + "artifacts": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py" + ], + "risk_considered": "N=1 byte-equivalence guaranteed by the `len(pipeline.repos) > 1` guard (the only runnable case today; secondary-repo worktree materialisation is task-7-1, still pending). Reordering `repos` makes the slice's repo primary for a secondary slice, so EGG_PIPELINE_REPO becomes the slice repo \u2014 correct under slice\u2194repo 1:1 (authorship/naming follow the slice's repo); EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS full owner/repo map is unchanged. Multi-repo end-to-end depends on task-7-1 populating repo_volumes with secondaries + creating the on-disk worktree; this slice is structurally complete and forward-compatible. Boundary: `_build_slice_diff_summary` (PR-body rendering, best-effort) intentionally not rescoped \u2014 it is not the reviewer audit diff or test gate.", + "commit_sha": "996d3cb1b", + "files_changed": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py", + ".egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md" + ], + "tests_run": [], + "tasks_satisfied": [ + "task-6-1" + ], + "no_changes_needed": false, + "no_changes_reason": "" + }, + "version": 1, + "commit_sha": "996d3cb1b", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:01.130340+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "4812a307-d8c6-48", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:01.745422+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "c6266913-42a3-4f", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:08.808989+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "71c91f42-7e99-4b", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:10.312000+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "22297563-de3a-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:11.660361+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "1651d55c-1d1a-4b", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:12.940456+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a8aa2d18-bb29-4e", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:14.000751+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a4143ff4-be00-40", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:16.037264+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "86729858-f670-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=177977 util=0.18 cache_hit=0.99 decision=no_warm_session", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:16.083194+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "561972ca-ac57-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:19.700439+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "5a23f9eb-e507-43", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:21.578690+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "8abd0cff-5370-43", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:22.297960+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "36780167-109f-47", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:26.730007+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "d3701e0d-e715-41", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:58:28.667615+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "32e78b93-1937-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "coder", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_security for coder", + "body": "Security-neutral. The slice-6 change scopes a slice's gate-repo/worktree/cwd to its own repo without introducing any credential, egress, or visibility surface: gateway/network mode (private-vs-public posture) is threaded through unchanged, repo_volumes stays owner/repo-keyed with per-repo token resolution untouched, and the slice_repos reordering only selects the agent cwd (EGG_REPO_PATH), not credential scope \u2014 so no cross-repo private\u2192public content flow. Worktree path resolution is bounded (split(\"/\")[-1] + exists() guard + safe fallback) and repo slugs come from validated submission RepoSpecs, not agent input, so no path-traversal vector. Contract-load failure degrades fail-safe to the pipeline primary. The _resolve_slice_gate_repo extraction is a behavior-preserving delegation to resolve_slice_repo. No security concerns.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Security-neutral. The slice-6 change scopes a slice's gate-repo/worktree/cwd to its own repo without introducing any credential, egress, or visibility surface: gateway/network mode (private-vs-public posture) is threaded through unchanged, repo_volumes stays owner/repo-keyed with per-repo token resolution untouched, and the slice_repos reordering only selects the agent cwd (EGG_REPO_PATH), not credential scope \u2014 so no cross-repo private\u2192public content flow. Worktree path resolution is bounded (split(\"/\")[-1] + exists() guard + safe fallback) and repo slugs come from validated submission RepoSpecs, not agent input, so no path-traversal vector. Contract-load failure degrades fail-safe to the pipeline primary. The _resolve_slice_gate_repo extraction is a behavior-preserving delegation to resolve_slice_repo. No security concerns.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:03.085845+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "966ec29f-754c-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "coder", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_code_holistic for coder", + "body": "Slice-6 coder v1 ACK. The new routes-layer accessor _resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) is a clean single-source-of-truth wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo, matching the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface exactly (secondary\u2192slice repo, repoless\u2192primary, N=1\u2192single repo; both tests pass at convergence). The inline resolve_slice_repo import was correctly removed from _run_concurrent_phase with no dangling reference \u2014 the only call site there now uses the accessor. Behavior is byte-identical for N=1 (gated on len(pipeline.repos) > 1) and pure delegation for multi-repo, so no new behavior beyond the already-reviewed slice-repo scoping. No correctness, architecture, or consistency concerns.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py", + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Slice-6 coder v1 ACK. The new routes-layer accessor _resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) is a clean single-source-of-truth wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo, matching the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface exactly (secondary\u2192slice repo, repoless\u2192primary, N=1\u2192single repo; both tests pass at convergence). The inline resolve_slice_repo import was correctly removed from _run_concurrent_phase with no dangling reference \u2014 the only call site there now uses the accessor. Behavior is byte-identical for N=1 (gated on len(pipeline.repos) > 1) and pure delegation for multi-repo, so no new behavior beyond the already-reviewed slice-repo scoping. No correctness, architecture, or consistency concerns.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:28.304371+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "d0dc3d70-cef6-46", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=63224 util=0.06 cache_hit=0.97 decision=no_warm_session", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:32.229816+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "b4441b09-ce07-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=88982 util=0.09 cache_hit=0.97 decision=no_warm_session", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:35.536086+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "6eb0af16-b6ab-44", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_PROPOSE", + "subject": "Proposal from tester", + "body": "slice-6 (task-6-2): per-repo test-gate + reviewer-diff + check-command scoping tests \u2014 CONVERGED with coder. Added a section to orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py (commit 3db72777e, already integrated into the slice branch) following the slices-2/4/5 two-layer idiom. Always-green model-level rule tests pin that every implement-phase gate scopes to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo), not the primary: TestPerRepoTestGateScoping (gate repo = slice repo; repoless\u2192primary; per-slice; egg-in-multi-repo baseline; N=1), TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase (diff base = slice repo's RepoSpec.base_branch, differs from primary for cross-repo; repoless\u2192primary; N=1 unchanged), TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution (check/lint commands keyed by slice repo; egg baseline; N=1). REAL test TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection exercises routes.resolve_worktree_path (monkeypatched _WORKTREE_BASE_DIR + tmp_path): the slice's repo path resolves to that repo's own per-repo worktree subdir, not the primary's. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor targets the coder seam routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo \u2014 handed to the coder via task-6-1 gap-1 and now LANDED (coder commit 996d3cb1b), so this class has ACTIVATED and passes against the real accessor (asserts it == resolve_slice_repo for secondary/repoless/N=1). Post-convergence verification on the integrated branch tip: pytest orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py -k 'PerRepo or SliceGateRepo' = 23 passed, 0 skipped; full module 56 passed earlier; ruff check + format clean.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "summary": "slice-6 (task-6-2): per-repo test-gate + reviewer-diff + check-command scoping tests \u2014 CONVERGED with coder. Added a section to orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py (commit 3db72777e, already integrated into the slice branch) following the slices-2/4/5 two-layer idiom. Always-green model-level rule tests pin that every implement-phase gate scopes to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo), not the primary: TestPerRepoTestGateScoping (gate repo = slice repo; repoless\u2192primary; per-slice; egg-in-multi-repo baseline; N=1), TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase (diff base = slice repo's RepoSpec.base_branch, differs from primary for cross-repo; repoless\u2192primary; N=1 unchanged), TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution (check/lint commands keyed by slice repo; egg baseline; N=1). REAL test TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection exercises routes.resolve_worktree_path (monkeypatched _WORKTREE_BASE_DIR + tmp_path): the slice's repo path resolves to that repo's own per-repo worktree subdir, not the primary's. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor targets the coder seam routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo \u2014 handed to the coder via task-6-1 gap-1 and now LANDED (coder commit 996d3cb1b), so this class has ACTIVATED and passes against the real accessor (asserts it == resolve_slice_repo for secondary/repoless/N=1). Post-convergence verification on the integrated branch tip: pytest orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py -k 'PerRepo or SliceGateRepo' = 23 passed, 0 skipped; full module 56 passed earlier; ruff check + format clean.", + "attestation": { + "tests_execution_blocked": true, + "tests_execution_blocked_reason": "Full configured repo check suite (lint, security, test) cannot execute in this tester sandbox: PyPI egress is blocked (invalid peer certificate / UnknownIssuer via the squid proxy) so `make deps`/`sync-venv` cannot build .venv, and every `make lint`/`make test`/`make security` target depends on sync-venv-if-uv; security tooling (bandit, safety, trivy) and yamllint are also absent system-wide so the `security` check cannot run here at all. What I DID run directly with the system interpreter against the CONVERGED branch tip (996d3cb1b, coder + tester integrated) and which passed (reviewer detail, not a strict-mode checks_passed claim): `pytest orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py -k 'PerRepo or SliceGateRepo'` -> 23 passed / 0 skipped (the coder's _resolve_slice_gate_repo landed so TestSliceGateRepoAccessor activated and passes); full-module `pytest orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py` -> 56 passed / 4 skipped (pre-existing slice-2/4 guards) before convergence; `ruff check` + `ruff format --check` clean. The narrowed `make test` / full `make test-all` + `make security` remain the convergence-time gate in the CI/gateway environment." + }, + "artifacts": [ + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py", + "3db72777e" + ], + "risk_considered": "Converged with the coder: task-6-1 (gate scoping 4553fd012 + _resolve_slice_gate_repo accessor 996d3cb1b) is now integrated on the slice branch alongside my tests, so the previously skip-guarded TestSliceGateRepoAccessor is active and green \u2014 no dangling permanently-skipped test. Always-green rule tests pin the invariants against the slice-1 model API + shipped resolve_worktree_path resolver independent of coder internals. Commit already on origin (ancestor of tip) so push=false. Sandbox cannot build .venv (blocked egress) so make lint/security/test are unrunnable here \u2014 attested tests_execution_blocked with direct pytest+ruff results documented; make test-all/security is the convergence gate. Scope kept strictly to task-6-2 AC \u2014 not entangled with the slice-4/7 cq-4 secondary-repo worktree-materialization HITL.", + "commit_sha": "3db72777e", + "files_changed": [ + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "tests_run": [], + "tasks_satisfied": [ + "task-6-2" + ], + "no_changes_needed": false, + "no_changes_reason": "" + }, + "version": 1, + "commit_sha": "3db72777e", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:37.082390+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "6e3afe2f-b386-44", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "orchestrator", + "to_role": "documenter", + "message_type": "STATUS", + "subject": "Ready to confirm \u2014 all confirm preconditions satisfied", + "body": "Your proposal (version 1) is ready to confirm \u2014 all blocking reviews are clear and global confirm preconditions are met. Run `egg-orch consensus confirmed` to confirm.", + "metadata": { + "ready_to_confirm": true, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:37.083704+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "ad98d253-3b6d-45", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "documenter", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by documenter", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:41.084732+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "74069485-e828-44", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:43.905238+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "8572e64c-3489-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:44.154983+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "b86b258f-a8e9-48", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:45.331287+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "dcf2eb59-8d86-43", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "coder", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_code for coder", + "body": "Verified the coder's slice-6 change to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py against live code. (1) `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) -> str|None` wraps models.resolve_slice_repo and matches the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface exactly (secondary\u2192own repo, repoless\u2192primary, N=1\u2192singleton); py_compile clean. (2) The `_run_concurrent_phase` slice-scoping block is correctly gated (`slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1`); contract load is best-effort and degrades to the pipeline primary on failure without blocking the spawn; `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` returns the per-repo worktree if it exists else fallback; per-repo base_branch is pulled from the matching RepoSpec; slice-repo-first `repos` ordering drives the spawner cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH; repo/repo_path are threaded to both the prompt builder and the spawn. (3) Correctness invariant confirmed: `_sync_repos_and_legacy_singleton` keeps `pipeline.repo == repos[0].repo == primary_repo`, so the `resolved != pipeline.repo` guard makes a repoless (primary) slice stay on the primary worktree and only a genuine secondary-repo slice divert \u2014 no false-divert bug. N=1 path is byte-identical (block skipped). No blocking issues.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Verified the coder's slice-6 change to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py against live code. (1) `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) -> str|None` wraps models.resolve_slice_repo and matches the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface exactly (secondary\u2192own repo, repoless\u2192primary, N=1\u2192singleton); py_compile clean. (2) The `_run_concurrent_phase` slice-scoping block is correctly gated (`slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1`); contract load is best-effort and degrades to the pipeline primary on failure without blocking the spawn; `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` returns the per-repo worktree if it exists else fallback; per-repo base_branch is pulled from the matching RepoSpec; slice-repo-first `repos` ordering drives the spawner cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH; repo/repo_path are threaded to both the prompt builder and the spawn. (3) Correctness invariant confirmed: `_sync_repos_and_legacy_singleton` keeps `pipeline.repo == repos[0].repo == primary_repo`, so the `resolved != pipeline.repo` guard makes a repoless (primary) slice stay on the primary worktree and only a genuine secondary-repo slice divert \u2014 no false-divert bug. N=1 path is byte-identical (block skipped). No blocking issues.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:45.391461+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "394ff6bd-d343-49", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:46.970106+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "cd7cfbc5-c7be-4b", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:49.331720+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "b9b620ae-8a23-49", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "coder", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_concurrency for coder", + "body": "Concurrency-clean. Slice-6 task-6-1/6-2 scopes test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/base-branch to slice.repo. (1) New vars (slice_repo, slice_repo_path, slice_repos, slice_base_branch) are all function-local to _run_concurrent_phase \u2014 no new shared mutable state; slice_repos is a freshly-built list, not a mutation of shared `repos`; repo_volumes threaded through read-only. (2) load_contract is read-only with a try/except that degrades to the primary repo \u2014 safe fallback, no write race. (3) _resolve_slice_worktree_path reuses the SAME per-repo keying as the pre-existing _resolve_pipeline_worktree_path; .exists() is a benign read, worst-case race falls back to the primary worktree. (4) N=1 gated (len(pipeline.repos) > 1) \u21d2 single-repo byte-identical, zero new concurrency surface. (5) _resolve_slice_gate_repo is a pure delegate \u2014 no concurrency concern. Non-blocking/out-of-scope: same-repo concurrent slices sharing one repo worktree is a pre-existing DAG-scheduler property (already true for the primary repo), not introduced here.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Concurrency-clean. Slice-6 task-6-1/6-2 scopes test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/base-branch to slice.repo. (1) New vars (slice_repo, slice_repo_path, slice_repos, slice_base_branch) are all function-local to _run_concurrent_phase \u2014 no new shared mutable state; slice_repos is a freshly-built list, not a mutation of shared `repos`; repo_volumes threaded through read-only. (2) load_contract is read-only with a try/except that degrades to the primary repo \u2014 safe fallback, no write race. (3) _resolve_slice_worktree_path reuses the SAME per-repo keying as the pre-existing _resolve_pipeline_worktree_path; .exists() is a benign read, worst-case race falls back to the primary worktree. (4) N=1 gated (len(pipeline.repos) > 1) \u21d2 single-repo byte-identical, zero new concurrency surface. (5) _resolve_slice_gate_repo is a pure delegate \u2014 no concurrency concern. Non-blocking/out-of-scope: same-repo concurrent slices sharing one repo worktree is a pre-existing DAG-scheduler property (already true for the primary repo), not introduced here.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:49.410372+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "944e4616-1be5-4e", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T18:59:57.989548+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "d2c2e549-be9c-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:15.583363+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "5cc12a4f-eb93-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:17.920033+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "651abf0a-55c5-48", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "coder", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_contract for coder", + "body": "ACK task-6-1 (scope test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/conventions to slice.repo). All three acceptance criteria met: (1) test gate + reviewer diff scoped to the slice's repo \u2014 repo=slice_repo, repo_path=slice_repo_path, base branch resolved from the slice's RepoSpec.base_branch (fallback pipeline base \u2192 get_default_branch in the slice worktree); (2) agent cwd + per-repo conventions \u2014 repos=[resolved,*rest] orders the slice's repo first, and I verified kubernetes_spawner/_spawn.py derives EGG_REPO_PATH/cwd from next(iter(repos)), so cwd points at the slice's worktree, while repo=slice_repo drives get_repo_checks and file-boundary patterns from that repo; (3) N=1 baseline unchanged \u2014 the whole block is gated on len(pipeline.repos)>1 and resolved!=pipeline.repo, so single-repo/egg slices are byte-identical. _resolve_slice_gate_repo is a thin wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo (single source of truth, converges with the tester's TestSliceGateRepoAccessor). Scope confined to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py (matches task-6-1 files_affected); py_compile clean. Non-blocking note: a secondary repo with RepoSpec.base_branch=None falls back to the primary base rather than auto-detecting the secondary default, but slice-2 auto-detects base at submission so RepoSpec.base_branch should already be populated.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "ACK task-6-1 (scope test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/conventions to slice.repo). All three acceptance criteria met: (1) test gate + reviewer diff scoped to the slice's repo \u2014 repo=slice_repo, repo_path=slice_repo_path, base branch resolved from the slice's RepoSpec.base_branch (fallback pipeline base \u2192 get_default_branch in the slice worktree); (2) agent cwd + per-repo conventions \u2014 repos=[resolved,*rest] orders the slice's repo first, and I verified kubernetes_spawner/_spawn.py derives EGG_REPO_PATH/cwd from next(iter(repos)), so cwd points at the slice's worktree, while repo=slice_repo drives get_repo_checks and file-boundary patterns from that repo; (3) N=1 baseline unchanged \u2014 the whole block is gated on len(pipeline.repos)>1 and resolved!=pipeline.repo, so single-repo/egg slices are byte-identical. _resolve_slice_gate_repo is a thin wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo (single source of truth, converges with the tester's TestSliceGateRepoAccessor). Scope confined to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py (matches task-6-1 files_affected); py_compile clean. Non-blocking note: a secondary repo with RepoSpec.base_branch=None falls back to the primary base rather than auto-detecting the secondary default, but slice-2 auto-detects base at submission so RepoSpec.base_branch should already be populated.", + "ack_version": 1, + "attestation": { + "tasks_verified": [ + "task-6-1" + ], + "compiles": true, + "scope_confined": true, + "n1_baseline_unchanged": true + } + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:17.960842+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "28594ce8-12d2-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "orchestrator", + "to_role": "coder", + "message_type": "STATUS", + "subject": "Ready to confirm \u2014 all confirm preconditions satisfied", + "body": "Your proposal (version 1) is ready to confirm \u2014 all blocking reviews are clear and global confirm preconditions are met. Run `egg-orch consensus confirmed` to confirm.", + "metadata": { + "ready_to_confirm": true, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:17.962090+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "47550371-d0aa-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:18.418743+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "046bf195-24cc-40", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:20.049953+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "0c8b542a-6729-40", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:22.314594+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "cd665b79-5561-40", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "coder", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by coder", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:23.226702+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "e293c4ef-2f6a-46", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "tester", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_security for tester", + "body": "Security-neutral (test-only). No security surface: pure model-level rule assertions + skip-guarded integration tests, no credential handling, network/egress, subprocess exec, or hardcoded secrets; standard tmp_path/monkeypatch fixtures. If anything it reinforces the multi-repo isolation posture \u2014 the tests pin that each slice's test gate, reviewer diff base, and check/lint commands scope to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo), never cross-wired to the pipeline primary, which is exactly the property that prevents a secondary-repo slice from being validated against the wrong repo. Skip-guards degrade cleanly until the coder seam converges. No security concerns.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Security-neutral (test-only). No security surface: pure model-level rule assertions + skip-guarded integration tests, no credential handling, network/egress, subprocess exec, or hardcoded secrets; standard tmp_path/monkeypatch fixtures. If anything it reinforces the multi-repo isolation posture \u2014 the tests pin that each slice's test gate, reviewer diff base, and check/lint commands scope to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo), never cross-wired to the pipeline primary, which is exactly the property that prevents a secondary-repo slice from being validated against the wrong repo. Skip-guards degrade cleanly until the coder seam converges. No security concerns.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:42.926570+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "7ac1f11e-7eb0-44", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:43.361579+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "c71503f2-a7f3-4f", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by reviewer_security", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:45.442775+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "2d5a701c-61f5-4f", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6)", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:52.891589+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a9a45d3d-af3a-47", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=77607 util=0.08 cache_hit=0.98 decision=below_threshold", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:00:52.983425+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "2e01b1b6-c4ca-4f", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "tester", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_concurrency for tester", + "body": "Concurrency-clean (test-only). Slice-6 task-6-2 adds per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping tests. (1) All added tests are synchronous unit/rule tests \u2014 no threads, no async, no concurrent.futures, no shared mutable state across tests; zero concurrency surface introduced. (2) monkeypatch.setattr(_routes_pkg, '_WORKTREE_BASE_DIR', tmp_path) mutates a module global but pytest runs sequentially and monkeypatch auto-reverts per test \u2014 no cross-test race; each test uses isolated tmp_path fixtures so no filesystem contention. (3) Positively, the tests pin the per-slice worktree/gate scoping invariant I ACKed on the coder side: TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection asserts the resolver selects the slice's own per-repo subdir (not the primary's), and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor cross-checks _resolve_slice_gate_repo == resolve_slice_repo. Skip-guards on coder-owned seams (_resolve_slice_gate_repo, cross_repo_merge_gate) are correct convergence hygiene. Nothing in the concurrency domain to block on.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Concurrency-clean (test-only). Slice-6 task-6-2 adds per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping tests. (1) All added tests are synchronous unit/rule tests \u2014 no threads, no async, no concurrent.futures, no shared mutable state across tests; zero concurrency surface introduced. (2) monkeypatch.setattr(_routes_pkg, '_WORKTREE_BASE_DIR', tmp_path) mutates a module global but pytest runs sequentially and monkeypatch auto-reverts per test \u2014 no cross-test race; each test uses isolated tmp_path fixtures so no filesystem contention. (3) Positively, the tests pin the per-slice worktree/gate scoping invariant I ACKed on the coder side: TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection asserts the resolver selects the slice's own per-repo subdir (not the primary's), and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor cross-checks _resolve_slice_gate_repo == resolve_slice_repo. Skip-guards on coder-owned seams (_resolve_slice_gate_repo, cross_repo_merge_gate) are correct convergence hygiene. Nothing in the concurrency domain to block on.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:14.196159+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "786839bd-7fc0-43", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by reviewer_concurrency", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:15.524234+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "956c28bc-4aef-48", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "coder", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from tester for coder", + "body": "Verified coder proposal 996d3cb1b (slice-6 task-6-1). The new routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) accessor is exactly the seam my task-6-2 gap pinned: it delegates to models.resolve_slice_repo, so gate/diff/cwd all key off the slice's own repo (primary-fallback for a repoless slice, single-repo for N=1). Ran the slice-6 tester suite against this SHA: 16/16 pass, including the now-activated TestSliceGateRepoAccessor (test_accessor_matches_rule_for_multi_repo, test_accessor_n1_single_repo) which converges at exactly this commit. N=1 byte-equivalence assertions (gate/diff-base/checks) remain green. Call-site refactor in _run_concurrent_phase preserves the len(pipeline.repos)>1 guard.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py", + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Verified coder proposal 996d3cb1b (slice-6 task-6-1). The new routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) accessor is exactly the seam my task-6-2 gap pinned: it delegates to models.resolve_slice_repo, so gate/diff/cwd all key off the slice's own repo (primary-fallback for a repoless slice, single-repo for N=1). Ran the slice-6 tester suite against this SHA: 16/16 pass, including the now-activated TestSliceGateRepoAccessor (test_accessor_matches_rule_for_multi_repo, test_accessor_n1_single_repo) which converges at exactly this commit. N=1 byte-equivalence assertions (gate/diff-base/checks) remain green. Call-site refactor in _run_concurrent_phase preserves the len(pipeline.repos)>1 guard.", + "ack_version": 1, + "attestation": { + "tasks_verified": [ + "task-6-2" + ], + "tests_run": 16, + "checks_passed": [ + "test" + ] + } + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:16.686859+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "0f9ef7aa-95ee-45", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "tester", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_code_holistic for tester", + "body": "Slice-6 tester v1 ACK. The per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping suite (task-6-2) follows the established two-layer shape: always-green rule tests (_expected_gate_repo / _expected_diff_base / _resolve_checks_for_slice) are thin mirrors over the real shipped model API (resolve_slice_repo, primary_repo, RepoSpec.base_branch) \u2014 so TestPerRepoTestGateScoping / TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase / TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution pin the slice\u2192repo invariant against production code, not tautologies. The diff-base logic agrees with the coder's slice_base_branch resolution in _run_concurrent_phase. Real integration coverage via TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection (routes.resolve_worktree_path per-repo subdir) and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor (coder accessor == rule); both activate at convergence and pass live. All 16 slice-6 tests green. Skip guards are principled (explicit reasons, activate at convergence \u2014 no false-green). Latent non-blocking gap: no direct end-to-end test that _run_concurrent_phase threads the accessor result into the spawn kwarg \u2014 inherent to the heavy Flask/docker surface, adequately compensated by the accessor + worktree-resolver units. No correctness or false-green concerns.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Slice-6 tester v1 ACK. The per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping suite (task-6-2) follows the established two-layer shape: always-green rule tests (_expected_gate_repo / _expected_diff_base / _resolve_checks_for_slice) are thin mirrors over the real shipped model API (resolve_slice_repo, primary_repo, RepoSpec.base_branch) \u2014 so TestPerRepoTestGateScoping / TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase / TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution pin the slice\u2192repo invariant against production code, not tautologies. The diff-base logic agrees with the coder's slice_base_branch resolution in _run_concurrent_phase. Real integration coverage via TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection (routes.resolve_worktree_path per-repo subdir) and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor (coder accessor == rule); both activate at convergence and pass live. All 16 slice-6 tests green. Skip guards are principled (explicit reasons, activate at convergence \u2014 no false-green). Latent non-blocking gap: no direct end-to-end test that _run_concurrent_phase threads the accessor result into the spawn kwarg \u2014 inherent to the heavy Flask/docker surface, adequately compensated by the accessor + worktree-resolver units. No correctness or false-green concerns.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:21.405244+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "eefce2f3-7aab-48", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=85579 util=0.09 cache_hit=0.99 decision=below_threshold", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:23.412986+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "f0754cd4-e3d3-45", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=68016 util=0.07 cache_hit=0.98 decision=no_warm_session", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:25.026349+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "e1f15a85-2b04-49", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by reviewer_code_holistic", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:25.575566+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "a0d41c2b-4e6b-4e", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code_holistic", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=105743 util=0.11 cache_hit=0.99 decision=below_threshold", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:26.538792+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "8fe28656-4074-49", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "tester", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_code for tester", + "body": "Reviewed the tester's slice-6 (task-6-2) tests in orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py and RAN them: all 16 slice-6 tests PASS, none skipped \u2014 both Flask-surface classes (TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection, TestSliceGateRepoAccessor) activated, confirming convergence with the coder's landed _resolve_slice_gate_repo. Verified the spec-mirror helpers are faithful to the coder's real logic: _expected_gate_repo == resolve_slice_repo; _expected_diff_base iterates pipeline.repos for the matching RepoSpec.base_branch with a pipeline.base_branch fallback (matches _run_concurrent_phase); _resolve_checks_for_slice keys checks by the resolved repo. Real seams confirmed present: routes.resolve_worktree_path(pipeline_id, repo_path) at routes/__init__.py:246 (basename-keyed), the monkeypatch target _routes_pkg._WORKTREE_BASE_DIR at __init__.py:243, and _Path imported at line 432. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor cross-checks the coder's accessor against the expected rule. Skip guards are appropriate and N=1/egg baselines are pinned throughout. No blocking issues.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "Reviewed the tester's slice-6 (task-6-2) tests in orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py and RAN them: all 16 slice-6 tests PASS, none skipped \u2014 both Flask-surface classes (TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection, TestSliceGateRepoAccessor) activated, confirming convergence with the coder's landed _resolve_slice_gate_repo. Verified the spec-mirror helpers are faithful to the coder's real logic: _expected_gate_repo == resolve_slice_repo; _expected_diff_base iterates pipeline.repos for the matching RepoSpec.base_branch with a pipeline.base_branch fallback (matches _run_concurrent_phase); _resolve_checks_for_slice keys checks by the resolved repo. Real seams confirmed present: routes.resolve_worktree_path(pipeline_id, repo_path) at routes/__init__.py:246 (basename-keyed), the monkeypatch target _routes_pkg._WORKTREE_BASE_DIR at __init__.py:243, and _Path imported at line 432. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor cross-checks the coder's accessor against the expected rule. Skip guards are appropriate and N=1/egg baselines are pinned throughout. No blocking issues.", + "ack_version": 1 + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:01:58.523013+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "24e471d3-92af-44", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by reviewer_code", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:02.661389+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "fa1fa3f5-536d-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_code", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "HEARTBEAT", + "subject": "heartbeat: WORKING", + "body": "context-measure occ=119606 util=0.12 cache_hit=0.97 decision=below_threshold", + "metadata": { + "state": "WORKING", + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:05.108124+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "cde084fa-634c-4c", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "tester", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_ACK", + "subject": "ACK from reviewer_contract for tester", + "body": "ACK task-6-2 (slice-6 per-repo gate/diff/convention tests). All three AC assertions are covered: per-repo test-gate scoping (TestPerRepoTestGateScoping, plus TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection binding the real routes.resolve_worktree_path and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor binding the coder's routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo), per-repo reviewer-diff base (TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase), and per-repo check-command resolution (TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution); each class carries an egg-repo / N=1 baseline. Green requirement met: full test_pipelines.py runs 58 passed / 2 skipped, the slice-6 subset runs 16 passed / 0 skipped (both coder seams \u2014 _resolve_slice_gate_repo @ pipelines.py:10604 and resolve_worktree_path @ routes/__init__.py:246 \u2014 are already integrated, so the integration tests are live coverage rather than silent skips), and ruff is clean. The two-layer always-green-rule + skip-guarded-integration shape matches the accepted slices-2/4/5 convention.", + "metadata": { + "payload": { + "artifact_references": [ + "orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py" + ], + "reason": "ACK task-6-2 (slice-6 per-repo gate/diff/convention tests). All three AC assertions are covered: per-repo test-gate scoping (TestPerRepoTestGateScoping, plus TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection binding the real routes.resolve_worktree_path and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor binding the coder's routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo), per-repo reviewer-diff base (TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase), and per-repo check-command resolution (TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution); each class carries an egg-repo / N=1 baseline. Green requirement met: full test_pipelines.py runs 58 passed / 2 skipped, the slice-6 subset runs 16 passed / 0 skipped (both coder seams \u2014 _resolve_slice_gate_repo @ pipelines.py:10604 and resolve_worktree_path @ routes/__init__.py:246 \u2014 are already integrated, so the integration tests are live coverage rather than silent skips), and ruff is clean. The two-layer always-green-rule + skip-guarded-integration shape matches the accepted slices-2/4/5 convention.", + "ack_version": 1, + "attestation": { + "tasks_verified": [ + "task-6-2" + ], + "tests_result": "58 passed / 2 skipped (full test_pipelines.py); slice-6 subset 16 passed / 0 skipped; ruff clean", + "coder_seams_integrated": true + } + }, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:27.144643+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "9b430758-f749-4b", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "orchestrator", + "to_role": "tester", + "message_type": "STATUS", + "subject": "Ready to confirm \u2014 all confirm preconditions satisfied", + "body": "Your proposal (version 1) is ready to confirm \u2014 all blocking reviews are clear and global confirm preconditions are met. Run `egg-orch consensus confirmed` to confirm.", + "metadata": { + "ready_to_confirm": true, + "version": 1, + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:27.146100+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "2eb702b2-d360-46", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "tester", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by tester", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:27.812126+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "7e3a14ff-6a85-47", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_contract", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by reviewer_contract", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:27.813954+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "5ab3b45e-eb67-4a", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_security", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by reviewer_security", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:27.815663+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + }, + { + "id": "73c2f11d-b148-41", + "pipeline_id": "issue-3393", + "from_role": "reviewer_concurrency", + "to_role": "all", + "message_type": "CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED", + "subject": "Consensus confirmed by reviewer_concurrency", + "body": "orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop)", + "metadata": { + "slice_id": "slice-6" + }, + "timestamp": "2026-07-02T19:02:27.816572+00:00", + "phase": "implement" + } +] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.md b/.egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9a5db00c82 --- /dev/null +++ b/.egg-state/brc-history/3393-implement-slice-6.md @@ -0,0 +1,1423 @@ +# BRC Consensus History — implement phase, slice-6 + +Generated: 2026-07-02T19:02:27Z +Pipeline: issue-3393 +Slice: slice-6 + +### [2026-07-02T18:33:13Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=propose (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: c175a84e-8064-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:33:13Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=propose (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: ea4810bc-83e4-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:33:14Z] documenter (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=propose (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 27697764-8377-4d +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:33:19Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 9bc04f98-098f-43 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:33:21Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: cee975b0-ba6f-41 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:33:22Z] documenter (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 49f90c8d-2be5-49 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:35:30Z] documenter (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: bfacfcf8-5e10-40 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:35:35Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 51369776-e23f-48 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:35:39Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: fc842ce0-e5d1-4f +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:36:40Z] documenter (CONSENSUS_PROPOSE): Proposal from documenter + +Documented the shipped multi-repo pipeline model across the two current-state docs (task-6-3). docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md gains a "Multi-Repo Pipelines" section: list-shaped submission via submit_task / POST /api/v1/pipelines with per-repo base_branch (RepoSpec), the primary-repo concept (Pipeline.primary_repo, resolve_slice_repo), and the uniform-visibility + uniform-auth submission-time rules (get_repo_visibility fail-closed, get_auth_mode; same-name-different-owner allowed). docs/architecture/slice-dag.md gains a Slice.repo row in the New Slice fields table plus a "Per-slice repo (multi-repo pipelines)" section covering: the 1:1 slice↔repo rule + runtime resolver + schemaVersion 1.4 additive stamp; owner/repo-keyed worktree map (EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS); lazy per-repo work branch + context PR; per-slice PR routing with sibling cross-references; cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies (B→A cross-repo iff resolve_slice_repo differs); the two-tier cq-1 merge-sequencing hold (Tier A automated draft→ready on mergedAt not head-SHA, mark_pr_ready, CLOSED-unmerged + bounded-timeout HITL terminals; Tier B beyond-merge-state HITL opt-in); and per-repo test-gate/reviewer-diff/convention scoping. Current-state snapshot, no slice-number or pipeline-process narration; bidirectional cross-links between the two docs. + +````yaml +id: 3d2a4331-115a-4d +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + summary: "Documented the shipped multi-repo pipeline model across the two current-state\ + \ docs (task-6-3). docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md gains a \"Multi-Repo Pipelines\"\ + \ section: list-shaped submission via submit_task / POST /api/v1/pipelines with\ + \ per-repo base_branch (RepoSpec), the primary-repo concept (Pipeline.primary_repo,\ + \ resolve_slice_repo), and the uniform-visibility + uniform-auth submission-time\ + \ rules (get_repo_visibility fail-closed, get_auth_mode; same-name-different-owner\ + \ allowed). docs/architecture/slice-dag.md gains a Slice.repo row in the New\ + \ Slice fields table plus a \"Per-slice repo (multi-repo pipelines)\" section\ + \ covering: the 1:1 slice\u2194repo rule + runtime resolver + schemaVersion\ + \ 1.4 additive stamp; owner/repo-keyed worktree map (EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS); lazy\ + \ per-repo work branch + context PR; per-slice PR routing with sibling cross-references;\ + \ cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies (B\u2192A cross-repo iff resolve_slice_repo\ + \ differs); the two-tier cq-1 merge-sequencing hold (Tier A automated draft\u2192\ + ready on mergedAt not head-SHA, mark_pr_ready, CLOSED-unmerged + bounded-timeout\ + \ HITL terminals; Tier B beyond-merge-state HITL opt-in); and per-repo test-gate/reviewer-diff/convention\ + \ scoping. Current-state snapshot, no slice-number or pipeline-process narration;\ + \ bidirectional cross-links between the two docs." + attestation: {} + artifacts: + - docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md + - docs/architecture/slice-dag.md + risk_considered: 'Docs-only change (documenter file boundary: docs/ + **/*.md). + No code/behavior change. Verified every documented symbol against the landed + implementation (Slice.repo + schemaVersion 1.4 in shared/egg_contracts/models.py; + RepoSpec/Pipeline.repos/primary_repo/resolve_slice_repo in orchestrator/models.py; + EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS in kubernetes_spawner/_spawn.py; mark_pr_ready in gateway_client/_pr.py; + cross_repo_merge_gate.py two-tier hold). Anchors verified consistent across + both docs.' + commit_sha: 6afc6dfb75b3581d056cf128068e3dbf1fe19846 + files_changed: + - docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md + - docs/architecture/slice-dag.md + tests_run: [] + tasks_satisfied: + - task-6-3 + no_changes_needed: false + no_changes_reason: '' + version: 1 + commit_sha: 6afc6dfb75b3581d056cf128068e3dbf1fe19846 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:36:49Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: c609056b-8ef4-43 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:36:49Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 737acca0-73ac-49 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:36:55Z] documenter (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=135475 util=0.14 cache_hit=0.99 decision=no_warm_session + +````yaml +id: 48575b44-0ba9-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:36:58Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: bbd8e37f-62ed-4f +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:36:58Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: ec23e71f-8c65-40 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:37:42Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 46b6eeec-6ea1-4d +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:37:49Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: da7dfca4-bbff-48 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:37:57Z] reviewer_code → documenter (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_code for documenter + +Verified every concrete anchor in the docs diff against live code — all accurate and non-misleading. resolve_slice_repo (models.py:1484 returns slice.repo or pipeline.primary_repo), Pipeline.repos:list[RepoSpec] + primary_repo property, Slice.repo optional field with schema 1.4 additive _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4, cross_repo_merge_gate.py (draft-PR Tier-A hold; merge detection via mergedAt/merged NOT head-SHA per _is_merged; CLOSED-not-merged + attempt-bound HITL terminals), mark_pr_ready gateway verb, create_slice_pr repo-parameterized, gateway/repo_visibility.py:get_repo_visibility, and EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS owner/repo-keyed worktree map with naming env falling back to primary. Cross-file doc anchors resolve. No blocking issues. + +````yaml +id: a5fe14a2-d55c-4e +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md + - docs/architecture/slice-dag.md + reason: "Verified every concrete anchor in the docs diff against live code \u2014\ + \ all accurate and non-misleading. resolve_slice_repo (models.py:1484 returns\ + \ slice.repo or pipeline.primary_repo), Pipeline.repos:list[RepoSpec] + primary_repo\ + \ property, Slice.repo optional field with schema 1.4 additive _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4,\ + \ cross_repo_merge_gate.py (draft-PR Tier-A hold; merge detection via mergedAt/merged\ + \ NOT head-SHA per _is_merged; CLOSED-not-merged + attempt-bound HITL terminals),\ + \ mark_pr_ready gateway verb, create_slice_pr repo-parameterized, gateway/repo_visibility.py:get_repo_visibility,\ + \ and EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS owner/repo-keyed worktree map with naming env falling\ + \ back to primary. Cross-file doc anchors resolve. No blocking issues." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:38:06Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=66003 util=0.07 cache_hit=0.96 decision=no_warm_session + +````yaml +id: 3f67c7c0-eed1-42 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:38:47Z] reviewer_contract → documenter (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_contract for documenter + +ACK task-6-3 (docs snapshot of shipped multi-repo model). Both acceptance criteria met: (1) sdlc-pipeline.md documents list-shaped submission (MCP submit_task + POST /api/v1/pipelines, per-repo base_branch), the uniform-visibility + uniform-auth rules, and the primary-repo concept; (2) slice-dag.md documents Slice.repo (1:1 rule), per-repo work-branch/context-PR, cross-repo ordering via slice dependencies, the two-tier merge-sequencing hold, and per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping — as a current-state snapshot. Verified every code claim resolves to shipped symbols (resolve_slice_repo, Pipeline.primary_repo, RepoSpec/Pipeline.repos, _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4→schemaVersion 1.4, EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS + back-compat EGG_PIPELINE_REPO/EGG_REPO_PATH, cross_repo_merge_gate.py/mark_pr_ready, create_slice_pr, _assert_repo_set_uniform + get_repo_visibility/get_auth_mode). New sections contain no prohibited slice-N/task-N narration (only standard #3393 issue cites). Snapshot is faithful. + +````yaml +id: 38c2ced7-c301-4d +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - docs/guides/sdlc-pipeline.md + - docs/architecture/slice-dag.md + reason: "ACK task-6-3 (docs snapshot of shipped multi-repo model). Both acceptance\ + \ criteria met: (1) sdlc-pipeline.md documents list-shaped submission (MCP submit_task\ + \ + POST /api/v1/pipelines, per-repo base_branch), the uniform-visibility +\ + \ uniform-auth rules, and the primary-repo concept; (2) slice-dag.md documents\ + \ Slice.repo (1:1 rule), per-repo work-branch/context-PR, cross-repo ordering\ + \ via slice dependencies, the two-tier merge-sequencing hold, and per-repo gate/diff/convention\ + \ scoping \u2014 as a current-state snapshot. Verified every code claim resolves\ + \ to shipped symbols (resolve_slice_repo, Pipeline.primary_repo, RepoSpec/Pipeline.repos,\ + \ _migrate_schema_version_to_1_4\u2192schemaVersion 1.4, EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS\ + \ + back-compat EGG_PIPELINE_REPO/EGG_REPO_PATH, cross_repo_merge_gate.py/mark_pr_ready,\ + \ create_slice_pr, _assert_repo_set_uniform + get_repo_visibility/get_auth_mode).\ + \ New sections contain no prohibited slice-N/task-N narration (only standard\ + \ #3393 issue cites). Snapshot is faithful." + ack_version: 1 + attestation: + tasks_verified: + - task-6-3 + snapshot_accuracy: verified against shipped code (resolve_slice_repo, primary_repo, + RepoSpec, schemaVersion 1.4 additive after-stamp, EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS + back-compat + env, cross_repo_merge_gate/mark_pr_ready, create_slice_pr, uniform visibility+auth + validation) + no_slice_task_narration: true + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:38:56Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=72801 util=0.07 cache_hit=0.99 decision=no_warm_session + +````yaml +id: a5679d28-302d-44 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:39:55Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: cc8e41bf-aa24-42 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:39:56Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: a92fc394-1da9-4e +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:42:42Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: d2371efd-ba54-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:42:42Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: ba41bf1b-d32a-42 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:55:37Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 82c40eaf-75df-41 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:55:44Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: a33b3eb3-3ae9-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:01Z] coder (CONSENSUS_PROPOSE): Proposal from coder + +Slice-6 task-6-1: scope the implement-phase test gate, reviewer diff, per-repo check/lint commands, and agent cwd to the slice's repo (slice ↔ repo 1:1). All wiring lands in `_run_concurrent_phase` (per-slice team spawn driver) in orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py. There is NO orchestrator-side `make test`/`make lint` subprocess (grep-confirmed) — the test gate is the tester agent's configured checks and the reviewer diff is the reviewers' in-worktree `git diff origin/...HEAD`; both are scoped by threading the slice's repo/worktree/base into the prompt builder + spawn. Changes: (1) `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline)` — the single gate-repo source of truth (== resolve_slice_repo), matching the tester's pinned task-6-2 TestSliceGateRepoAccessor; (2) `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` helper (WORKTREE_BASE_DIR/pipeline.id/, mirrors slice-3 owner/repo layout); (3) a scoping block gated on `slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1` that loads the contract, resolves the slice's repo via the accessor, and — only when it differs from the primary — sets slice_repo, slice_repo_path, per-repo base (from the matching RepoSpec), and reorders `repos` slice-first; (4) `_build_agent_prompt` gets repo=slice_repo + repo_path=slice_repo_path (drives get_repo_checks for per-repo commands, file-boundary patterns, reviewer diff base); (5) `create_concurrent_spawn_fn` gets repos=slice_repos — `_spawn.py:460` derives cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH from next(iter(repos)), so slice-first ordering sets the agent cwd to the slice's repo worktree. N=1 (egg) is byte-identical: block skipped for ≤1-repo pipelines, no extra contract read. Contract-load failure soft-degrades to primary. Merged tester task-6-2 tests (3db72777e) + documenter docs (6afc6dfb7). + +````yaml +id: d4346bbb-df3a-4e +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + summary: "Slice-6 task-6-1: scope the implement-phase test gate, reviewer diff,\ + \ per-repo check/lint commands, and agent cwd to the slice's repo (slice \u2194\ + \ repo 1:1). All wiring lands in `_run_concurrent_phase` (per-slice team spawn\ + \ driver) in orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py. There is NO orchestrator-side\ + \ `make test`/`make lint` subprocess (grep-confirmed) \u2014 the test gate is\ + \ the tester agent's configured checks and the reviewer diff is the reviewers'\ + \ in-worktree `git diff origin/...HEAD`; both are scoped by threading\ + \ the slice's repo/worktree/base into the prompt builder + spawn. Changes: (1)\ + \ `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline)` \u2014 the single gate-repo source\ + \ of truth (== resolve_slice_repo), matching the tester's pinned task-6-2 TestSliceGateRepoAccessor;\ + \ (2) `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` helper (WORKTREE_BASE_DIR/pipeline.id/,\ + \ mirrors slice-3 owner/repo layout); (3) a scoping block gated on `slice_id\ + \ and len(pipeline.repos) > 1` that loads the contract, resolves the slice's\ + \ repo via the accessor, and \u2014 only when it differs from the primary \u2014\ + \ sets slice_repo, slice_repo_path, per-repo base (from the matching RepoSpec),\ + \ and reorders `repos` slice-first; (4) `_build_agent_prompt` gets repo=slice_repo\ + \ + repo_path=slice_repo_path (drives get_repo_checks for per-repo commands,\ + \ file-boundary patterns, reviewer diff base); (5) `create_concurrent_spawn_fn`\ + \ gets repos=slice_repos \u2014 `_spawn.py:460` derives cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH from\ + \ next(iter(repos)), so slice-first ordering sets the agent cwd to the slice's\ + \ repo worktree. N=1 (egg) is byte-identical: block skipped for \u22641-repo\ + \ pipelines, no extra contract read. Contract-load failure soft-degrades to\ + \ primary. Merged tester task-6-2 tests (3db72777e) + documenter docs (6afc6dfb7)." + attestation: {} + artifacts: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + risk_considered: "N=1 byte-equivalence guaranteed by the `len(pipeline.repos)\ + \ > 1` guard (the only runnable case today; secondary-repo worktree materialisation\ + \ is task-7-1, still pending). Reordering `repos` makes the slice's repo primary\ + \ for a secondary slice, so EGG_PIPELINE_REPO becomes the slice repo \u2014\ + \ correct under slice\u2194repo 1:1 (authorship/naming follow the slice's repo);\ + \ EGG_PIPELINE_REPOS full owner/repo map is unchanged. Multi-repo end-to-end\ + \ depends on task-7-1 populating repo_volumes with secondaries + creating the\ + \ on-disk worktree; this slice is structurally complete and forward-compatible.\ + \ Boundary: `_build_slice_diff_summary` (PR-body rendering, best-effort) intentionally\ + \ not rescoped \u2014 it is not the reviewer audit diff or test gate." + commit_sha: 996d3cb1b + files_changed: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + - .egg-state/agent-outputs/coder/brc-memory-issue-3393.md + tests_run: [] + tasks_satisfied: + - task-6-1 + no_changes_needed: false + no_changes_reason: '' + version: 1 + commit_sha: 996d3cb1b + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:01Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 4812a307-d8c6-48 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:08Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: c6266913-42a3-4f +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:10Z] reviewer_code_holistic (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 71c91f42-7e99-4b +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:11Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 22297563-de3a-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:12Z] reviewer_security (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 1651d55c-1d1a-4b +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:14Z] reviewer_concurrency (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: a8aa2d18-bb29-4e +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:16Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: a4143ff4-be00-40 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:16Z] coder (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=177977 util=0.18 cache_hit=0.99 decision=no_warm_session + +````yaml +id: 86729858-f670-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:19Z] reviewer_code_holistic (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 561972ca-ac57-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:21Z] reviewer_concurrency (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 5a23f9eb-e507-43 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:22Z] reviewer_security (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 8abd0cff-5370-43 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:26Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 36780167-109f-47 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:58:28Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: d3701e0d-e715-41 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:03Z] reviewer_security → coder (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_security for coder + +Security-neutral. The slice-6 change scopes a slice's gate-repo/worktree/cwd to its own repo without introducing any credential, egress, or visibility surface: gateway/network mode (private-vs-public posture) is threaded through unchanged, repo_volumes stays owner/repo-keyed with per-repo token resolution untouched, and the slice_repos reordering only selects the agent cwd (EGG_REPO_PATH), not credential scope — so no cross-repo private→public content flow. Worktree path resolution is bounded (split("/")[-1] + exists() guard + safe fallback) and repo slugs come from validated submission RepoSpecs, not agent input, so no path-traversal vector. Contract-load failure degrades fail-safe to the pipeline primary. The _resolve_slice_gate_repo extraction is a behavior-preserving delegation to resolve_slice_repo. No security concerns. + +````yaml +id: 32e78b93-1937-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + reason: "Security-neutral. The slice-6 change scopes a slice's gate-repo/worktree/cwd\ + \ to its own repo without introducing any credential, egress, or visibility\ + \ surface: gateway/network mode (private-vs-public posture) is threaded through\ + \ unchanged, repo_volumes stays owner/repo-keyed with per-repo token resolution\ + \ untouched, and the slice_repos reordering only selects the agent cwd (EGG_REPO_PATH),\ + \ not credential scope \u2014 so no cross-repo private\u2192public content flow.\ + \ Worktree path resolution is bounded (split(\"/\")[-1] + exists() guard + safe\ + \ fallback) and repo slugs come from validated submission RepoSpecs, not agent\ + \ input, so no path-traversal vector. Contract-load failure degrades fail-safe\ + \ to the pipeline primary. The _resolve_slice_gate_repo extraction is a behavior-preserving\ + \ delegation to resolve_slice_repo. No security concerns." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:28Z] reviewer_code_holistic → coder (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_code_holistic for coder + +Slice-6 coder v1 ACK. The new routes-layer accessor _resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) is a clean single-source-of-truth wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo, matching the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface exactly (secondary→slice repo, repoless→primary, N=1→single repo; both tests pass at convergence). The inline resolve_slice_repo import was correctly removed from _run_concurrent_phase with no dangling reference — the only call site there now uses the accessor. Behavior is byte-identical for N=1 (gated on len(pipeline.repos) > 1) and pure delegation for multi-repo, so no new behavior beyond the already-reviewed slice-repo scoping. No correctness, architecture, or consistency concerns. + +````yaml +id: 966ec29f-754c-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + reason: "Slice-6 coder v1 ACK. The new routes-layer accessor _resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice,\ + \ pipeline) is a clean single-source-of-truth wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo,\ + \ matching the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface exactly (secondary\u2192\ + slice repo, repoless\u2192primary, N=1\u2192single repo; both tests pass at\ + \ convergence). The inline resolve_slice_repo import was correctly removed from\ + \ _run_concurrent_phase with no dangling reference \u2014 the only call site\ + \ there now uses the accessor. Behavior is byte-identical for N=1 (gated on\ + \ len(pipeline.repos) > 1) and pure delegation for multi-repo, so no new behavior\ + \ beyond the already-reviewed slice-repo scoping. No correctness, architecture,\ + \ or consistency concerns." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:32Z] reviewer_security (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=63224 util=0.06 cache_hit=0.97 decision=no_warm_session + +````yaml +id: d0dc3d70-cef6-46 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:35Z] reviewer_code_holistic (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=88982 util=0.09 cache_hit=0.97 decision=no_warm_session + +````yaml +id: b4441b09-ce07-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:37Z] tester (CONSENSUS_PROPOSE): Proposal from tester + +slice-6 (task-6-2): per-repo test-gate + reviewer-diff + check-command scoping tests — CONVERGED with coder. Added a section to orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py (commit 3db72777e, already integrated into the slice branch) following the slices-2/4/5 two-layer idiom. Always-green model-level rule tests pin that every implement-phase gate scopes to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo), not the primary: TestPerRepoTestGateScoping (gate repo = slice repo; repoless→primary; per-slice; egg-in-multi-repo baseline; N=1), TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase (diff base = slice repo's RepoSpec.base_branch, differs from primary for cross-repo; repoless→primary; N=1 unchanged), TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution (check/lint commands keyed by slice repo; egg baseline; N=1). REAL test TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection exercises routes.resolve_worktree_path (monkeypatched _WORKTREE_BASE_DIR + tmp_path): the slice's repo path resolves to that repo's own per-repo worktree subdir, not the primary's. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor targets the coder seam routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo — handed to the coder via task-6-1 gap-1 and now LANDED (coder commit 996d3cb1b), so this class has ACTIVATED and passes against the real accessor (asserts it == resolve_slice_repo for secondary/repoless/N=1). Post-convergence verification on the integrated branch tip: pytest orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py -k 'PerRepo or SliceGateRepo' = 23 passed, 0 skipped; full module 56 passed earlier; ruff check + format clean. + +````yaml +id: 6eb0af16-b6ab-44 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + summary: "slice-6 (task-6-2): per-repo test-gate + reviewer-diff + check-command\ + \ scoping tests \u2014 CONVERGED with coder. Added a section to orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py\ + \ (commit 3db72777e, already integrated into the slice branch) following the\ + \ slices-2/4/5 two-layer idiom. Always-green model-level rule tests pin that\ + \ every implement-phase gate scopes to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo),\ + \ not the primary: TestPerRepoTestGateScoping (gate repo = slice repo; repoless\u2192\ + primary; per-slice; egg-in-multi-repo baseline; N=1), TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase\ + \ (diff base = slice repo's RepoSpec.base_branch, differs from primary for cross-repo;\ + \ repoless\u2192primary; N=1 unchanged), TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution (check/lint\ + \ commands keyed by slice repo; egg baseline; N=1). REAL test TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection\ + \ exercises routes.resolve_worktree_path (monkeypatched _WORKTREE_BASE_DIR +\ + \ tmp_path): the slice's repo path resolves to that repo's own per-repo worktree\ + \ subdir, not the primary's. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor targets the coder seam\ + \ routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo \u2014 handed to the coder via task-6-1\ + \ gap-1 and now LANDED (coder commit 996d3cb1b), so this class has ACTIVATED\ + \ and passes against the real accessor (asserts it == resolve_slice_repo for\ + \ secondary/repoless/N=1). Post-convergence verification on the integrated branch\ + \ tip: pytest orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py -k 'PerRepo or SliceGateRepo'\ + \ = 23 passed, 0 skipped; full module 56 passed earlier; ruff check + format\ + \ clean." + attestation: + tests_execution_blocked: true + tests_execution_blocked_reason: 'Full configured repo check suite (lint, security, + test) cannot execute in this tester sandbox: PyPI egress is blocked (invalid + peer certificate / UnknownIssuer via the squid proxy) so `make deps`/`sync-venv` + cannot build .venv, and every `make lint`/`make test`/`make security` target + depends on sync-venv-if-uv; security tooling (bandit, safety, trivy) and yamllint + are also absent system-wide so the `security` check cannot run here at all. + What I DID run directly with the system interpreter against the CONVERGED + branch tip (996d3cb1b, coder + tester integrated) and which passed (reviewer + detail, not a strict-mode checks_passed claim): `pytest orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + -k ''PerRepo or SliceGateRepo''` -> 23 passed / 0 skipped (the coder''s _resolve_slice_gate_repo + landed so TestSliceGateRepoAccessor activated and passes); full-module `pytest + orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py` -> 56 passed / 4 skipped (pre-existing + slice-2/4 guards) before convergence; `ruff check` + `ruff format --check` + clean. The narrowed `make test` / full `make test-all` + `make security` remain + the convergence-time gate in the CI/gateway environment.' + artifacts: + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + - 3db72777e + risk_considered: "Converged with the coder: task-6-1 (gate scoping 4553fd012 +\ + \ _resolve_slice_gate_repo accessor 996d3cb1b) is now integrated on the slice\ + \ branch alongside my tests, so the previously skip-guarded TestSliceGateRepoAccessor\ + \ is active and green \u2014 no dangling permanently-skipped test. Always-green\ + \ rule tests pin the invariants against the slice-1 model API + shipped resolve_worktree_path\ + \ resolver independent of coder internals. Commit already on origin (ancestor\ + \ of tip) so push=false. Sandbox cannot build .venv (blocked egress) so make\ + \ lint/security/test are unrunnable here \u2014 attested tests_execution_blocked\ + \ with direct pytest+ruff results documented; make test-all/security is the\ + \ convergence gate. Scope kept strictly to task-6-2 AC \u2014 not entangled\ + \ with the slice-4/7 cq-4 secondary-repo worktree-materialization HITL." + commit_sha: 3db72777e + files_changed: + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + tests_run: [] + tasks_satisfied: + - task-6-2 + no_changes_needed: false + no_changes_reason: '' + version: 1 + commit_sha: 3db72777e + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:37Z] orchestrator → documenter (STATUS): Ready to confirm — all confirm preconditions satisfied + +Your proposal (version 1) is ready to confirm — all blocking reviews are clear and global confirm preconditions are met. Run `egg-orch consensus confirmed` to confirm. + +````yaml +id: 6e3afe2f-b386-44 +phase: implement +metadata: + ready_to_confirm: true + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:41Z] documenter (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by documenter + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: ad98d253-3b6d-45 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:43Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 74069485-e828-44 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:44Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 8572e64c-3489-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:45Z] reviewer_code_holistic (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: b86b258f-a8e9-48 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:45Z] reviewer_code → coder (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_code for coder + +Verified the coder's slice-6 change to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py against live code. (1) `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) -> str|None` wraps models.resolve_slice_repo and matches the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor interface exactly (secondary→own repo, repoless→primary, N=1→singleton); py_compile clean. (2) The `_run_concurrent_phase` slice-scoping block is correctly gated (`slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1`); contract load is best-effort and degrades to the pipeline primary on failure without blocking the spawn; `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` returns the per-repo worktree if it exists else fallback; per-repo base_branch is pulled from the matching RepoSpec; slice-repo-first `repos` ordering drives the spawner cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH; repo/repo_path are threaded to both the prompt builder and the spawn. (3) Correctness invariant confirmed: `_sync_repos_and_legacy_singleton` keeps `pipeline.repo == repos[0].repo == primary_repo`, so the `resolved != pipeline.repo` guard makes a repoless (primary) slice stay on the primary worktree and only a genuine secondary-repo slice divert — no false-divert bug. N=1 path is byte-identical (block skipped). No blocking issues. + +````yaml +id: dcf2eb59-8d86-43 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + reason: "Verified the coder's slice-6 change to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py\ + \ against live code. (1) `_resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) -> str|None`\ + \ wraps models.resolve_slice_repo and matches the tester's pinned TestSliceGateRepoAccessor\ + \ interface exactly (secondary\u2192own repo, repoless\u2192primary, N=1\u2192\ + singleton); py_compile clean. (2) The `_run_concurrent_phase` slice-scoping\ + \ block is correctly gated (`slice_id and len(pipeline.repos) > 1`); contract\ + \ load is best-effort and degrades to the pipeline primary on failure without\ + \ blocking the spawn; `_resolve_slice_worktree_path` returns the per-repo worktree\ + \ if it exists else fallback; per-repo base_branch is pulled from the matching\ + \ RepoSpec; slice-repo-first `repos` ordering drives the spawner cwd/EGG_REPO_PATH;\ + \ repo/repo_path are threaded to both the prompt builder and the spawn. (3)\ + \ Correctness invariant confirmed: `_sync_repos_and_legacy_singleton` keeps\ + \ `pipeline.repo == repos[0].repo == primary_repo`, so the `resolved != pipeline.repo`\ + \ guard makes a repoless (primary) slice stay on the primary worktree and only\ + \ a genuine secondary-repo slice divert \u2014 no false-divert bug. N=1 path\ + \ is byte-identical (block skipped). No blocking issues." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:46Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 394ff6bd-d343-49 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:49Z] reviewer_security (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: cd7cfbc5-c7be-4b +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:49Z] reviewer_concurrency → coder (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_concurrency for coder + +Concurrency-clean. Slice-6 task-6-1/6-2 scopes test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/base-branch to slice.repo. (1) New vars (slice_repo, slice_repo_path, slice_repos, slice_base_branch) are all function-local to _run_concurrent_phase — no new shared mutable state; slice_repos is a freshly-built list, not a mutation of shared `repos`; repo_volumes threaded through read-only. (2) load_contract is read-only with a try/except that degrades to the primary repo — safe fallback, no write race. (3) _resolve_slice_worktree_path reuses the SAME per-repo keying as the pre-existing _resolve_pipeline_worktree_path; .exists() is a benign read, worst-case race falls back to the primary worktree. (4) N=1 gated (len(pipeline.repos) > 1) ⇒ single-repo byte-identical, zero new concurrency surface. (5) _resolve_slice_gate_repo is a pure delegate — no concurrency concern. Non-blocking/out-of-scope: same-repo concurrent slices sharing one repo worktree is a pre-existing DAG-scheduler property (already true for the primary repo), not introduced here. + +````yaml +id: b9b620ae-8a23-49 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + reason: "Concurrency-clean. Slice-6 task-6-1/6-2 scopes test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/base-branch\ + \ to slice.repo. (1) New vars (slice_repo, slice_repo_path, slice_repos, slice_base_branch)\ + \ are all function-local to _run_concurrent_phase \u2014 no new shared mutable\ + \ state; slice_repos is a freshly-built list, not a mutation of shared `repos`;\ + \ repo_volumes threaded through read-only. (2) load_contract is read-only with\ + \ a try/except that degrades to the primary repo \u2014 safe fallback, no write\ + \ race. (3) _resolve_slice_worktree_path reuses the SAME per-repo keying as\ + \ the pre-existing _resolve_pipeline_worktree_path; .exists() is a benign read,\ + \ worst-case race falls back to the primary worktree. (4) N=1 gated (len(pipeline.repos)\ + \ > 1) \u21D2 single-repo byte-identical, zero new concurrency surface. (5)\ + \ _resolve_slice_gate_repo is a pure delegate \u2014 no concurrency concern.\ + \ Non-blocking/out-of-scope: same-repo concurrent slices sharing one repo worktree\ + \ is a pre-existing DAG-scheduler property (already true for the primary repo),\ + \ not introduced here." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T18:59:57Z] reviewer_concurrency (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 944e4616-1be5-4e +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:15Z] reviewer_code_holistic (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: d2c2e549-be9c-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:17Z] reviewer_security (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 5cc12a4f-eb93-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:17Z] reviewer_contract → coder (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_contract for coder + +ACK task-6-1 (scope test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/conventions to slice.repo). All three acceptance criteria met: (1) test gate + reviewer diff scoped to the slice's repo — repo=slice_repo, repo_path=slice_repo_path, base branch resolved from the slice's RepoSpec.base_branch (fallback pipeline base → get_default_branch in the slice worktree); (2) agent cwd + per-repo conventions — repos=[resolved,*rest] orders the slice's repo first, and I verified kubernetes_spawner/_spawn.py derives EGG_REPO_PATH/cwd from next(iter(repos)), so cwd points at the slice's worktree, while repo=slice_repo drives get_repo_checks and file-boundary patterns from that repo; (3) N=1 baseline unchanged — the whole block is gated on len(pipeline.repos)>1 and resolved!=pipeline.repo, so single-repo/egg slices are byte-identical. _resolve_slice_gate_repo is a thin wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo (single source of truth, converges with the tester's TestSliceGateRepoAccessor). Scope confined to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py (matches task-6-1 files_affected); py_compile clean. Non-blocking note: a secondary repo with RepoSpec.base_branch=None falls back to the primary base rather than auto-detecting the secondary default, but slice-2 auto-detects base at submission so RepoSpec.base_branch should already be populated. + +````yaml +id: 651abf0a-55c5-48 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + reason: "ACK task-6-1 (scope test-gate/reviewer-diff/cwd/conventions to slice.repo).\ + \ All three acceptance criteria met: (1) test gate + reviewer diff scoped to\ + \ the slice's repo \u2014 repo=slice_repo, repo_path=slice_repo_path, base branch\ + \ resolved from the slice's RepoSpec.base_branch (fallback pipeline base \u2192\ + \ get_default_branch in the slice worktree); (2) agent cwd + per-repo conventions\ + \ \u2014 repos=[resolved,*rest] orders the slice's repo first, and I verified\ + \ kubernetes_spawner/_spawn.py derives EGG_REPO_PATH/cwd from next(iter(repos)),\ + \ so cwd points at the slice's worktree, while repo=slice_repo drives get_repo_checks\ + \ and file-boundary patterns from that repo; (3) N=1 baseline unchanged \u2014\ + \ the whole block is gated on len(pipeline.repos)>1 and resolved!=pipeline.repo,\ + \ so single-repo/egg slices are byte-identical. _resolve_slice_gate_repo is\ + \ a thin wrapper over models.resolve_slice_repo (single source of truth, converges\ + \ with the tester's TestSliceGateRepoAccessor). Scope confined to orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py\ + \ (matches task-6-1 files_affected); py_compile clean. Non-blocking note: a\ + \ secondary repo with RepoSpec.base_branch=None falls back to the primary base\ + \ rather than auto-detecting the secondary default, but slice-2 auto-detects\ + \ base at submission so RepoSpec.base_branch should already be populated." + ack_version: 1 + attestation: + tasks_verified: + - task-6-1 + compiles: true + scope_confined: true + n1_baseline_unchanged: true + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:17Z] orchestrator → coder (STATUS): Ready to confirm — all confirm preconditions satisfied + +Your proposal (version 1) is ready to confirm — all blocking reviews are clear and global confirm preconditions are met. Run `egg-orch consensus confirmed` to confirm. + +````yaml +id: 28594ce8-12d2-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + ready_to_confirm: true + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:18Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 47550371-d0aa-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:20Z] reviewer_concurrency (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 046bf195-24cc-40 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:22Z] reviewer_concurrency (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 0c8b542a-6729-40 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:23Z] coder (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by coder + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: cd665b79-5561-40 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:42Z] reviewer_security → tester (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_security for tester + +Security-neutral (test-only). No security surface: pure model-level rule assertions + skip-guarded integration tests, no credential handling, network/egress, subprocess exec, or hardcoded secrets; standard tmp_path/monkeypatch fixtures. If anything it reinforces the multi-repo isolation posture — the tests pin that each slice's test gate, reviewer diff base, and check/lint commands scope to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo), never cross-wired to the pipeline primary, which is exactly the property that prevents a secondary-repo slice from being validated against the wrong repo. Skip-guards degrade cleanly until the coder seam converges. No security concerns. + +````yaml +id: e293c4ef-2f6a-46 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + reason: "Security-neutral (test-only). No security surface: pure model-level rule\ + \ assertions + skip-guarded integration tests, no credential handling, network/egress,\ + \ subprocess exec, or hardcoded secrets; standard tmp_path/monkeypatch fixtures.\ + \ If anything it reinforces the multi-repo isolation posture \u2014 the tests\ + \ pin that each slice's test gate, reviewer diff base, and check/lint commands\ + \ scope to the slice's OWN repo (resolve_slice_repo), never cross-wired to the\ + \ pipeline primary, which is exactly the property that prevents a secondary-repo\ + \ slice from being validated against the wrong repo. Skip-guards degrade cleanly\ + \ until the coder seam converges. No security concerns." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:43Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +one-shot event handler action=ack (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 7ac1f11e-7eb0-44 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:45Z] reviewer_security (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by reviewer_security + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: c71503f2-a7f3-4f +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:52Z] reviewer_contract (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +in-tool-loop liveness (slice=slice-6) + +````yaml +id: 2d5a701c-61f5-4f +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:00:52Z] reviewer_security (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=77607 util=0.08 cache_hit=0.98 decision=below_threshold + +````yaml +id: a9a45d3d-af3a-47 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:14Z] reviewer_concurrency → tester (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_concurrency for tester + +Concurrency-clean (test-only). Slice-6 task-6-2 adds per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping tests. (1) All added tests are synchronous unit/rule tests — no threads, no async, no concurrent.futures, no shared mutable state across tests; zero concurrency surface introduced. (2) monkeypatch.setattr(_routes_pkg, '_WORKTREE_BASE_DIR', tmp_path) mutates a module global but pytest runs sequentially and monkeypatch auto-reverts per test — no cross-test race; each test uses isolated tmp_path fixtures so no filesystem contention. (3) Positively, the tests pin the per-slice worktree/gate scoping invariant I ACKed on the coder side: TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection asserts the resolver selects the slice's own per-repo subdir (not the primary's), and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor cross-checks _resolve_slice_gate_repo == resolve_slice_repo. Skip-guards on coder-owned seams (_resolve_slice_gate_repo, cross_repo_merge_gate) are correct convergence hygiene. Nothing in the concurrency domain to block on. + +````yaml +id: 2e01b1b6-c4ca-4f +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + reason: "Concurrency-clean (test-only). Slice-6 task-6-2 adds per-repo gate/diff/convention\ + \ scoping tests. (1) All added tests are synchronous unit/rule tests \u2014\ + \ no threads, no async, no concurrent.futures, no shared mutable state across\ + \ tests; zero concurrency surface introduced. (2) monkeypatch.setattr(_routes_pkg,\ + \ '_WORKTREE_BASE_DIR', tmp_path) mutates a module global but pytest runs sequentially\ + \ and monkeypatch auto-reverts per test \u2014 no cross-test race; each test\ + \ uses isolated tmp_path fixtures so no filesystem contention. (3) Positively,\ + \ the tests pin the per-slice worktree/gate scoping invariant I ACKed on the\ + \ coder side: TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection asserts the resolver selects the\ + \ slice's own per-repo subdir (not the primary's), and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor\ + \ cross-checks _resolve_slice_gate_repo == resolve_slice_repo. Skip-guards on\ + \ coder-owned seams (_resolve_slice_gate_repo, cross_repo_merge_gate) are correct\ + \ convergence hygiene. Nothing in the concurrency domain to block on." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:15Z] reviewer_concurrency (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by reviewer_concurrency + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: 786839bd-7fc0-43 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:16Z] tester → coder (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from tester for coder + +Verified coder proposal 996d3cb1b (slice-6 task-6-1). The new routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, pipeline) accessor is exactly the seam my task-6-2 gap pinned: it delegates to models.resolve_slice_repo, so gate/diff/cwd all key off the slice's own repo (primary-fallback for a repoless slice, single-repo for N=1). Ran the slice-6 tester suite against this SHA: 16/16 pass, including the now-activated TestSliceGateRepoAccessor (test_accessor_matches_rule_for_multi_repo, test_accessor_n1_single_repo) which converges at exactly this commit. N=1 byte-equivalence assertions (gate/diff-base/checks) remain green. Call-site refactor in _run_concurrent_phase preserves the len(pipeline.repos)>1 guard. + +````yaml +id: 956c28bc-4aef-48 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/routes/pipelines.py + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + reason: 'Verified coder proposal 996d3cb1b (slice-6 task-6-1). The new routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo(slice, + pipeline) accessor is exactly the seam my task-6-2 gap pinned: it delegates + to models.resolve_slice_repo, so gate/diff/cwd all key off the slice''s own + repo (primary-fallback for a repoless slice, single-repo for N=1). Ran the slice-6 + tester suite against this SHA: 16/16 pass, including the now-activated TestSliceGateRepoAccessor + (test_accessor_matches_rule_for_multi_repo, test_accessor_n1_single_repo) which + converges at exactly this commit. N=1 byte-equivalence assertions (gate/diff-base/checks) + remain green. Call-site refactor in _run_concurrent_phase preserves the len(pipeline.repos)>1 + guard.' + ack_version: 1 + attestation: + tasks_verified: + - task-6-2 + tests_run: 16 + checks_passed: + - test + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:21Z] reviewer_code_holistic → tester (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_code_holistic for tester + +Slice-6 tester v1 ACK. The per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping suite (task-6-2) follows the established two-layer shape: always-green rule tests (_expected_gate_repo / _expected_diff_base / _resolve_checks_for_slice) are thin mirrors over the real shipped model API (resolve_slice_repo, primary_repo, RepoSpec.base_branch) — so TestPerRepoTestGateScoping / TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase / TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution pin the slice→repo invariant against production code, not tautologies. The diff-base logic agrees with the coder's slice_base_branch resolution in _run_concurrent_phase. Real integration coverage via TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection (routes.resolve_worktree_path per-repo subdir) and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor (coder accessor == rule); both activate at convergence and pass live. All 16 slice-6 tests green. Skip guards are principled (explicit reasons, activate at convergence — no false-green). Latent non-blocking gap: no direct end-to-end test that _run_concurrent_phase threads the accessor result into the spawn kwarg — inherent to the heavy Flask/docker surface, adequately compensated by the accessor + worktree-resolver units. No correctness or false-green concerns. + +````yaml +id: 0f9ef7aa-95ee-45 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + reason: "Slice-6 tester v1 ACK. The per-repo gate/diff/convention scoping suite\ + \ (task-6-2) follows the established two-layer shape: always-green rule tests\ + \ (_expected_gate_repo / _expected_diff_base / _resolve_checks_for_slice) are\ + \ thin mirrors over the real shipped model API (resolve_slice_repo, primary_repo,\ + \ RepoSpec.base_branch) \u2014 so TestPerRepoTestGateScoping / TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase\ + \ / TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution pin the slice\u2192repo invariant against\ + \ production code, not tautologies. The diff-base logic agrees with the coder's\ + \ slice_base_branch resolution in _run_concurrent_phase. Real integration coverage\ + \ via TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection (routes.resolve_worktree_path per-repo subdir)\ + \ and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor (coder accessor == rule); both activate at convergence\ + \ and pass live. All 16 slice-6 tests green. Skip guards are principled (explicit\ + \ reasons, activate at convergence \u2014 no false-green). Latent non-blocking\ + \ gap: no direct end-to-end test that _run_concurrent_phase threads the accessor\ + \ result into the spawn kwarg \u2014 inherent to the heavy Flask/docker surface,\ + \ adequately compensated by the accessor + worktree-resolver units. No correctness\ + \ or false-green concerns." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:23Z] reviewer_concurrency (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=85579 util=0.09 cache_hit=0.99 decision=below_threshold + +````yaml +id: eefce2f3-7aab-48 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:25Z] tester (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=68016 util=0.07 cache_hit=0.98 decision=no_warm_session + +````yaml +id: f0754cd4-e3d3-45 +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:25Z] reviewer_code_holistic (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by reviewer_code_holistic + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: e1f15a85-2b04-49 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:26Z] reviewer_code_holistic (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=105743 util=0.11 cache_hit=0.99 decision=below_threshold + +````yaml +id: a0d41c2b-4e6b-4e +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:01:58Z] reviewer_code → tester (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_code for tester + +Reviewed the tester's slice-6 (task-6-2) tests in orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py and RAN them: all 16 slice-6 tests PASS, none skipped — both Flask-surface classes (TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection, TestSliceGateRepoAccessor) activated, confirming convergence with the coder's landed _resolve_slice_gate_repo. Verified the spec-mirror helpers are faithful to the coder's real logic: _expected_gate_repo == resolve_slice_repo; _expected_diff_base iterates pipeline.repos for the matching RepoSpec.base_branch with a pipeline.base_branch fallback (matches _run_concurrent_phase); _resolve_checks_for_slice keys checks by the resolved repo. Real seams confirmed present: routes.resolve_worktree_path(pipeline_id, repo_path) at routes/__init__.py:246 (basename-keyed), the monkeypatch target _routes_pkg._WORKTREE_BASE_DIR at __init__.py:243, and _Path imported at line 432. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor cross-checks the coder's accessor against the expected rule. Skip guards are appropriate and N=1/egg baselines are pinned throughout. No blocking issues. + +````yaml +id: 8fe28656-4074-49 +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + reason: "Reviewed the tester's slice-6 (task-6-2) tests in orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py\ + \ and RAN them: all 16 slice-6 tests PASS, none skipped \u2014 both Flask-surface\ + \ classes (TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection, TestSliceGateRepoAccessor) activated,\ + \ confirming convergence with the coder's landed _resolve_slice_gate_repo. Verified\ + \ the spec-mirror helpers are faithful to the coder's real logic: _expected_gate_repo\ + \ == resolve_slice_repo; _expected_diff_base iterates pipeline.repos for the\ + \ matching RepoSpec.base_branch with a pipeline.base_branch fallback (matches\ + \ _run_concurrent_phase); _resolve_checks_for_slice keys checks by the resolved\ + \ repo. Real seams confirmed present: routes.resolve_worktree_path(pipeline_id,\ + \ repo_path) at routes/__init__.py:246 (basename-keyed), the monkeypatch target\ + \ _routes_pkg._WORKTREE_BASE_DIR at __init__.py:243, and _Path imported at line\ + \ 432. TestSliceGateRepoAccessor cross-checks the coder's accessor against the\ + \ expected rule. Skip guards are appropriate and N=1/egg baselines are pinned\ + \ throughout. No blocking issues." + ack_version: 1 + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:02Z] reviewer_code (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by reviewer_code + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: 24e471d3-92af-44 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:05Z] reviewer_code (HEARTBEAT): heartbeat: WORKING + +context-measure occ=119606 util=0.12 cache_hit=0.97 decision=below_threshold + +````yaml +id: fa1fa3f5-536d-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + state: WORKING + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:27Z] reviewer_contract → tester (CONSENSUS_ACK): ACK from reviewer_contract for tester + +ACK task-6-2 (slice-6 per-repo gate/diff/convention tests). All three AC assertions are covered: per-repo test-gate scoping (TestPerRepoTestGateScoping, plus TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection binding the real routes.resolve_worktree_path and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor binding the coder's routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo), per-repo reviewer-diff base (TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase), and per-repo check-command resolution (TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution); each class carries an egg-repo / N=1 baseline. Green requirement met: full test_pipelines.py runs 58 passed / 2 skipped, the slice-6 subset runs 16 passed / 0 skipped (both coder seams — _resolve_slice_gate_repo @ pipelines.py:10604 and resolve_worktree_path @ routes/__init__.py:246 — are already integrated, so the integration tests are live coverage rather than silent skips), and ruff is clean. The two-layer always-green-rule + skip-guarded-integration shape matches the accepted slices-2/4/5 convention. + +````yaml +id: cde084fa-634c-4c +phase: implement +metadata: + payload: + artifact_references: + - orchestrator/tests/test_pipelines.py + reason: "ACK task-6-2 (slice-6 per-repo gate/diff/convention tests). All three\ + \ AC assertions are covered: per-repo test-gate scoping (TestPerRepoTestGateScoping,\ + \ plus TestPerRepoWorktreeSelection binding the real routes.resolve_worktree_path\ + \ and TestSliceGateRepoAccessor binding the coder's routes.pipelines._resolve_slice_gate_repo),\ + \ per-repo reviewer-diff base (TestPerRepoReviewerDiffBase), and per-repo check-command\ + \ resolution (TestPerRepoCheckCommandResolution); each class carries an egg-repo\ + \ / N=1 baseline. Green requirement met: full test_pipelines.py runs 58 passed\ + \ / 2 skipped, the slice-6 subset runs 16 passed / 0 skipped (both coder seams\ + \ \u2014 _resolve_slice_gate_repo @ pipelines.py:10604 and resolve_worktree_path\ + \ @ routes/__init__.py:246 \u2014 are already integrated, so the integration\ + \ tests are live coverage rather than silent skips), and ruff is clean. The\ + \ two-layer always-green-rule + skip-guarded-integration shape matches the accepted\ + \ slices-2/4/5 convention." + ack_version: 1 + attestation: + tasks_verified: + - task-6-2 + tests_result: 58 passed / 2 skipped (full test_pipelines.py); slice-6 subset + 16 passed / 0 skipped; ruff clean + coder_seams_integrated: true + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:27Z] orchestrator → tester (STATUS): Ready to confirm — all confirm preconditions satisfied + +Your proposal (version 1) is ready to confirm — all blocking reviews are clear and global confirm preconditions are met. Run `egg-orch consensus confirmed` to confirm. + +````yaml +id: 9b430758-f749-4b +phase: implement +metadata: + ready_to_confirm: true + version: 1 + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:27Z] tester (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by tester + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: 2eb702b2-d360-46 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:27Z] reviewer_contract (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by reviewer_contract + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: 7e3a14ff-6a85-47 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:27Z] reviewer_security (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by reviewer_security + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: 5ab3b45e-eb67-4a +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +```` + +### [2026-07-02T19:02:27Z] reviewer_concurrency (CONSENSUS_CONFIRMED): Consensus confirmed by reviewer_concurrency + +orchestrator-side confirm (#3064 event loop) + +````yaml +id: 73c2f11d-b148-41 +phase: implement +metadata: + slice_id: slice-6 +````