Add jstachio #127
Open
Add jstachio #127
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The project doesn’t cache pages. If you enable caches, you just test the “HashMap” implementation. |
I don't follow nor understand why that matters for the PR. All I did was follow the readme by building, It should not be surprising that Rocker or JStachio "might" run faster "on my machine" than JSP as they do the same thing: compile to Java. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had to backport some automatic stuff we do for Spring Boot 3 because this project is Spring Boot 2 (javax instead of jakarta).
My testing it shows it faster than JSP and the same speed as Rocker. I'm surprised the readme shows Rocker as slower.
BTW the apache tomcat response stream buffer should probably be set higher.