You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
Taking as an example the Bayesian Network of {cloudy, sprinkler, rain, wetGrass},
Is there any way to provide evidence in the form "Now, I know that the probability of wetGrass-true is 60% and wetGrass-false is 40%"?. Note that this is different from the example where the evidence is in the form "I am completely sure that wetGrass-true is 100% and wetGrass-false is 0%".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note that this library is intentionally quite low level. It doesn't expect any value to be a probability nor does it normalise the results. It just runs the junction tree algorithm for the given factor graph that have the given numerical arrays as the factor potentials whatever they are. It returns the results for the factors and you need to normalise them in order to get probabilities. Also, if you need some specific marginals, you may need to do that marginalisation to some array manually.
Hello,
Taking as an example the Bayesian Network of {cloudy, sprinkler, rain, wetGrass},
Is there any way to provide evidence in the form "Now, I know that the probability of wetGrass-true is 60% and wetGrass-false is 40%"?. Note that this is different from the example where the evidence is in the form "I am completely sure that wetGrass-true is 100% and wetGrass-false is 0%".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: