We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
Should the label (Line 75) for stereo contrastive loss be a one-hot vector? It seems the label in the code is a all-zero vector.
On the other hand, when we generate random shift for the negative samples (Line 151~Line 164), why we split "n_neg" as "shift1" and "shift2"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
Should the label (Line 75) for stereo contrastive loss be a one-hot vector? It seems the label in the code is a all-zero vector.
On the other hand, when we generate random shift for the negative samples (Line 151~Line 164), why we split "n_neg" as "shift1" and "shift2"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: