You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We could use a hash checksum to distinguish between packages with the same name or add the upper-level folder name to the namespace until the paths are different.
Otherwise, it will create an incorrect UML diagram.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the UML is being output as the same package, when in fact it is a different package, because the package names under client and server are the same. However, it is possible that my design is bad.....
I am checking the details now.
I think this is a bug.
Different packages should have different paths.
We could use a hash checksum to distinguish between packages with the same name or add the upper-level folder name to the namespace until the paths are different.
Otherwise, it will create an incorrect UML diagram.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: