New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Explanation of violations of D01-formula could be more precise #1

Open

jessealama opened this issue Aug 19, 2011 · 0 comments

Assignees

Owner

jessealama commented Aug 19, 2011

When making moves that violate the rule D01-formula, say something like

When one asserts a formula as an attack, the statement that one is attacking must be either a negation or an implication.

ghost assigned jessealama

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment