Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tab UI 异常 LEDE 分支 V 1.8.1 #419

Closed
BenjaminX opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Tab UI 异常 LEDE 分支 V 1.8.1 #419

BenjaminX opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@BenjaminX
Copy link

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to '...'
  2. Click on '....'
  3. Scroll down to '....'
  4. See error

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Openwrt (please complete the following information):

  • Versiosn: [e.g. 18.06-lean]
  • Theme [e.g. argon]
  • Version [e.g. 2.27]

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

  • Device: [e.g. iPhone6]
  • OS: [e.g. iOS8.1]
  • Browser [e.g. stock browser, safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@BenjaminX BenjaminX changed the title Tab UI Tab UI 异常 LEDE 分支 V 1.8.1 Jun 5, 2023
@BenjaminX
Copy link
Author

SCR-20230605-kdo
SCR-20230605-kdr

@SpeedPartner
Copy link
Collaborator

得给均衡负载状态擦屁股单独改进了....均衡负载的状态LuCI中,其实应该使用和其他LuCI相同的规范,先使用主选项卡(这个位置如果是主选项卡,也就是<ul class="tabs">,那么显示是没有问题的)
如以下预期布局:
Load_Balancing

但它上来就用了子选项卡<ul class="cbi-tabmenu">,那就会导致本主题显示的是非预期的布局,加上v1.8.1改了已选中和指针悬浮时的子选项卡的背景颜色,就出现颜色重叠了....

下次更新给均衡负载状态打补丁改进子选项卡的显示位置

@BenjaminX
Copy link
Author

Thx a lot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants