Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make a comment more inclusive #221

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Ladyprowess
Copy link
Contributor

Rather than "master" use "controller"
Rather than "slave" use "agent"

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
    Ensure you have provided tests - that demonstrates feature works or fixes the issue

Rather than "master" use "controller"
Rather than "slave" use "agent"
@jglick jglick added the chore label May 11, 2022
@jglick
Copy link
Member

jglick commented May 11, 2022

Could this be folded into #220 or vice-versa?

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

Could this be folded into #220 or vice-versa?

Yes, if that will improve its chances to be merged, then a single pull request that combines both this change and #220 can be created. Will that improve the changes of it being merged?

@jglick
Copy link
Member

jglick commented May 11, 2022

Not exactly necessary, but appreciated.

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

Not exactly necessary, but appreciated.

#227 includes both #220 and #221

jglick added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
More inclusive comments - combine #220 and #221
@jglick
Copy link
Member

jglick commented Jul 19, 2022

Folded into #227.

@jglick jglick closed this Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants