Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use non-deprecated lazily evaluated iterateEnclosingBlocks #133

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2020
Merged

Use non-deprecated lazily evaluated iterateEnclosingBlocks #133

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2020

Conversation

@dwnusbaum
Copy link
Member

Rebuilding

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum closed this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum reopened this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum
Copy link
Member

dwnusbaum commented Aug 14, 2020

I think the ExecutorStepTest.buildShellScriptAcrossRestart failure is similar to flakes investigated in #139, so I pushed a fix into #121 and will rebuild once that PR build passes and is merged.

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum closed this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum reopened this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum
Copy link
Member

Flaky Windows agent in the CI build, rebuilding:

Cannot contact aci-maven-windows-zrs99: hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: Channel "hudson.remoting.Channel@600065fe:JNLP4-connect connection from 40.79.75.29/40.79.75.29:24577": Remote call on JNLP4-connect connection from 40.79.75.29/40.79.75.29:24577 failed. The channel is closing down or has closed down

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum closed this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum reopened this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum
Copy link
Member

dwnusbaum commented Aug 14, 2020

Two test failures: ExecutorStepTest.contextualizeFreshFilePathAfterAgentReconnection (which I thought I fixed in #137... This time the test timed out, which is new at least. From a quick looks the problem is that we got here but not here) and ExecutorStepTest.reuseNodesWithDifferentLabelsFromPreviousRuns. Will try rebuilding.

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum closed this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum reopened this Aug 14, 2020
@dwnusbaum
Copy link
Member

dwnusbaum commented Aug 14, 2020

Hmm, looks like the failures this time are the ones mentioned at the bottom of #139 (comment); I'll look into them.

@dwnusbaum
Copy link
Member

79b5ef8 improves the tests so that failure messages will actually tell us what the difference is between the expected and actual behavior.

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2020
Copy link
Member

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, the tests passed this time, and as far as I can tell the main change shouldn't have introduced any new flaky tests, so I am going to go ahead and merge the PR.

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum merged commit 2971244 into jenkinsci:master Aug 17, 2020
@res0nance res0nance deleted the deprecated branch August 17, 2020 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants