You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please verify that the error is present in the most recent revision before reporting.
Chapter number or note title: Chapter 8
Page number: 300
Error description: There is an error in the caption of figure 8.18. It has been written "Four (of many) equal-length shortest paths. The �rst path is the “best” shortest path." however, the first image demonstrates that an equal length shortest path from the first vertex to the last vertex has a length of 14. Moreover, it is the third image (the one which has the path 1 -> 2 -> 5 -> 8 -> 9 highlighted) which represents the best shortest path, and not the first.
Suggested fix (if any): Change the current caption to:
"Three (of many) equal-length shortest paths. The second path is the “best” shortest path. The very first image demonstrates that all the equal length shortest paths would be having a path length of 14."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Please verify that the error is present in the most recent revision before reporting.
Chapter number or note title: Chapter 8
Page number: 300
Error description: There is an error in the caption of figure 8.18. It has been written "Four (of many) equal-length shortest paths. The �rst path is the “best” shortest path." however, the first image demonstrates that an equal length shortest path from the first vertex to the last vertex has a length of 14. Moreover, it is the third image (the one which has the path 1 -> 2 -> 5 -> 8 -> 9 highlighted) which represents the best shortest path, and not the first.
Suggested fix (if any): Change the current caption to:
"Three (of many) equal-length shortest paths. The second path is the “best” shortest path. The very first image demonstrates that all the equal length shortest paths would be having a path length of 14."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: