You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's irritating to have to move things from unstable to stable when releasing, and it's difficult to organize the code when there's internals that unstable features depend on. It may be better to just put all features into the main collection and not provide them from lens, unstable/lens could just reprovide the unstable features itself. There'd only be one module in unstable, unstable/lens.rkt, and it'd be much easier to "turn on" new features for releases.
Do you mean add new features in lens/private/ but don't reprovide them from lens/main.rkt and have unstable/lens.rkt reprovide them instead? Yeah, that sounds like a much better idea.
It's irritating to have to move things from unstable to stable when releasing, and it's difficult to organize the code when there's internals that unstable features depend on. It may be better to just put all features into the main collection and not provide them from
lens
,unstable/lens
could just reprovide the unstable features itself. There'd only be one module in unstable,unstable/lens.rkt
, and it'd be much easier to "turn on" new features for releases.@AlexKnauth thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: