feat(health-insurance): zod for health insurance #16379
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16379 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.75% 36.73% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 6804 6805 +1
Lines 140906 140760 -146
Branches 40137 40063 -74
==========================================
- Hits 51783 51705 -78
+ Misses 89123 89055 -68
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 67 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
WalkthroughThis pull request involves significant updates to the health insurance application components. Key modifications include the transition of several components to named exports, updates to import paths, and the introduction of new functionality within various forms. Notably, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (42)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/index.ts (3)
2-2: Good switch to named export, consider simplifying import path.The change to a named export for HiddenDateField is beneficial for tree-shaking. However, the import path
'./HiddenDateField/HiddenDateField'seems redundant.Consider simplifying the folder structure or import path if possible:
export { HiddenDateField } from './HiddenDateField'This assumes the component is directly in the HiddenDateField folder, not in a nested file of the same name.
3-3: Approved named export, consider consistent import path structure.The shift to a named export for MissingInfoRemarks enhances tree-shaking capabilities. However, the import path structure is similar to HiddenDateField, potentially indicating a pattern in the project structure.
Consider reviewing and potentially simplifying the folder structure or import paths consistently across components:
export { MissingInfoRemarks } from './MissingInfoRemarks'This assumes the component is directly in the MissingInfoRemarks folder, not in a nested file of the same name.
1-5: Summary: Excellent improvements in export structure and alignment with PR objectives.The changes in this file successfully implement the following improvements:
- Shift to named exports enhances tree-shaking capabilities and code reusability.
- Consistent use of relative import paths aligns with TypeScript/JavaScript module resolution standards.
- Removal of ConfirmCheckbox, AgentComment, and ChildrenInfoMessage components streamlines the application, as per the PR objectives.
These modifications align well with the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory, particularly in terms of reusability and effective tree-shaking practices. The changes also contribute to the overall goal of standardizing the health insurance application with practices used in other applications.For future consideration, evaluate the nested import path structure (
'./ComponentName/ComponentName') to determine if it provides significant benefits or if a simplified structure could improve maintainability without compromising the current architecture.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/aplicantInformationSection.ts (1)
5-9: LGTM: Well-structured section, but filename has a typo.The
applicantInformationSectionconstant is well-structured and follows best practices:
- Uses the
buildSectionfunction for consistency.- Properly utilizes the
mobject for internationalization.- Follows TypeScript usage as per coding guidelines.
However, there's a typo in the filename: 'aplicantInformationSection.ts' should be 'applicantInformationSection.ts'.
Please correct the filename to ensure consistency and prevent potential import issues.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/constants.ts (2)
13-18: Approved: Renamed enum improves clarityThe renaming of
StatusTypestoEmploymentStatusenhances code clarity and aligns with the PR's objective of improving code structure. The enum remains exported, maintaining reusability across different NextJS apps.For consistency, consider using string literals for all enum values:
export enum EmploymentStatus { EMPLOYED = 'EMPLOYED', PENSIONER = 'PENSIONER', STUDENT = 'STUDENT', OTHER = 'OTHER', }This change would make the enum values consistent with the
YesNoenum and potentially easier to use in switch statements or type guards.
20-23: Suggestions for improving constantsThe constants are well-defined and exported for reuse. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add a comment or rename
FILE_SIZE_LIMITto clarify its unit (e.g.,MAX_FILE_SIZE_BYTES).- If
EUandEFTAare part of a closed set of related constants, consider using an enum:export enum EconomicArea { EU = 'EU', EFTA = 'EFTA', }These changes would enhance clarity and type safety in the codebase.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/HiddenDateField/HiddenDateField.tsx (1)
7-7: Approve component signature changes with a minor suggestionThe changes to the component signature are good improvements:
- Using a named export instead of a default export enhances tree-shaking capabilities.
- Removing
FCtype andReact.PropsWithChildrensimplifies the type definition.- Directly destructuring props in the function parameters improves readability.
These changes align well with modern React and TypeScript best practices.
Consider adding an explicit return type to the component for better type safety:
-export const HiddenDateField = ({ application }: FieldBaseProps) => { +export const HiddenDateField = ({ application }: FieldBaseProps): JSX.Element => {libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/index.ts (3)
11-28: LGTM: Well-structured form with a suggestion for improved type safety.The
HealthInsuranceFormis well-organized and follows a logical flow. It adheres to the coding guidelines forlibs/**/*files, promoting reusability and effective tree-shaking.Consider adding explicit type annotations to improve type safety:
export const HealthInsuranceForm: Form = buildForm({ id: 'HealthInsuranceDraft' as const, // ... other properties })This ensures that the
idis treated as a literal type, which can be beneficial for type checking in other parts of the application.
21-26: LGTM: Well-structured conclusion section with a suggestion for localization.The conclusion section is properly implemented using
buildFormConclusionSection, which is consistent with the coding guidelines and promotes reusability.To enhance localization, consider using a more explicit naming convention for message keys:
buildFormConclusionSection({ alertTitle: m.healthInsurance.conclusion.successfulSubmissionTitle, alertMessage: m.healthInsurance.conclusion.successfulSubmissionMessage, expandableHeader: m.healthInsurance.conclusion.successfulExpendableHeader, expandableDescription: m.healthInsurance.conclusion.nextStepReviewTime, })This approach can help prevent naming conflicts and make it easier to manage translations across different parts of the application.
1-28: Great job on implementing the HealthInsuranceForm!The overall structure and implementation of the
HealthInsuranceFormare excellent. It adheres to the coding guidelines forlibs/**/*, promoting reusability, using TypeScript effectively, and following good practices for tree-shaking and bundling.The form is well-organized, with a logical flow of sections, and uses consistent patterns like
buildFormandbuildFormConclusionSection. This approach ensures compatibility with other applications in the codebase.To further enhance the form's flexibility and maintainability, consider:
- Implementing a configuration object for form settings, allowing easy customization without modifying the core structure.
- Creating a higher-order component (HOC) or custom hook to handle common form logic, which could be shared across different insurance forms.
These suggestions could make the form even more adaptable to future requirements while maintaining its current strengths.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/options.ts (2)
7-28: LGTM: Well-structured statusTypeOptions with a minor suggestionThe
statusTypeOptionsconstant is well-structured and promotes reusability. The use of localized messages for labels and tooltips is excellent for internationalization.Consider adding a type annotation to
statusTypeOptionsfor improved type safety:export const statusTypeOptions: Array<{ label: FormText; value: EmploymentStatus; tooltip: FormText; }> = [ // ... existing array contents ]
30-43: LGTM: Flexible countryOptions with localization, with a suggestion for improvementThe
countryOptionsconstant is well-implemented, providing flexible country options with localization support. This approach enhances reusability across different NextJS apps.Consider improving type safety by avoiding
JSON.stringify:type CountryOption = { name: string; countryCode: string; }; export const countryOptions: Array<{ label: () => string; value: CountryOption; }> = countries.map(({ name, alpha2Code: countryCode }) => { const option: CountryOption = { name, countryCode }; return { label: () => (name in messagesCountries ? cm[name as keyof typeof cm] : name), value: option, }; });This approach maintains the object structure without converting it to a string, which can be more type-safe and easier to work with in other parts of the application.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ReviewApplication.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-55: Consider exporting types for better reusability.The code adheres well to the coding guidelines for library files, using TypeScript and utility functions for better reusability. However, to further improve reusability across different NextJS apps, consider explicitly exporting any types or interfaces used in this form.
For example, you could add:
export interface ReviewApplicationProps { // Define any props used by the ReviewApplication form }This would allow other parts of the application to import and use these types, enhancing type safety and developer experience.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/index.tsx (2)
10-10: Approved: Component definition simplified and exported inline.The changes to the
Reviewcomponent definition are positive:
- Simplifying the type definition by removing
FCandPropsWithChildrenimproves readability while maintaining type safety.- Exporting the component inline is consistent with modern JavaScript practices.
These changes adhere to the coding guidelines for TypeScript usage and component reusability.
Consider adding an explicit return type to the function for improved type safety:
export const Review = ({ field, application }: FieldBaseProps): JSX.Element => { // ... component body ... }
Line range hint
1-47: Approved: Component structure promotes reusability and modularity.The overall structure of the
Reviewcomponent is well-designed:
- It uses modular sub-components (ContactInfo, StatusAndChildren, FormerInsurance) for different sections.
- Localization is properly implemented for labels, supporting internationalization.
- The component's structure aligns with its purpose of reviewing different aspects of health insurance.
These aspects adhere to the coding guidelines for reusability of components across different NextJS apps.
For consistency, consider extracting the Accordion labels into separate constants or a configuration object. This could improve maintainability and make it easier to update or translate labels in the future. For example:
const ACCORDION_ITEMS = [ { id: 'id_1', labelMessage: m.applicantInfoSection, Component: ContactInfo }, { id: 'id_2', labelMessage: m.statusAndChildren, Component: StatusAndChildren }, { id: 'id_3', labelMessage: m.formerInsuranceTitle, Component: FormerInsurance }, ]; // Then in the JSX: {ACCORDION_ITEMS.map(({ id, labelMessage, Component }) => ( <AccordionItem key={id} id={id} label={formatText(labelMessage, application, formatMessage)} > <Component application={application} field={field} isEditable={isEditable} /> </AccordionItem> ))}This approach would make the component more maintainable and easier to extend in the future.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (2)
13-19: Improved component declaration and props typingThe changes to the component declaration and props enhance type safety and follow best practices:
- Using named export (
export const ReviewMissingInfo) aligns with better tree-shaking practices.- Explicit props typing in the function signature improves TypeScript usage and type safety.
- The updated default value for
missingInfois more specific and type-safe.These modifications align well with the coding guidelines for TypeScript usage and effective bundling practices.
For even better type safety, consider using a non-null assertion or providing a default value for the
applicationprop:export const ReviewMissingInfo = ({ application!, field, isEditable, missingInfo = { date: '', remarks: '' }, index: missingInfoIndex, }: Props) => { // ... }This ensures that
applicationis always defined when the component is used.
Line range hint
20-58: Well-structured and reusable component implementationThe overall implementation of the
ReviewMissingInfocomponent is well-structured and follows best practices:
- It uses shared UI components from '@island.is/island-ui/core', promoting consistency across different NextJS apps.
- The component handles localization effectively using
useLocaleandformatText.- Conditional rendering is used appropriately for the
missingInfo.filessection.These aspects align well with the coding guidelines for reusability across different NextJS apps.
For improved type safety, consider adding a type assertion for the
fileparameter in the map function:{missingInfo.files.map((file: string, fileIndex: number) => ( <Bullet key={`${missingInfo.date}_file${fileIndex}`}> {file} </Bullet> ))}This ensures that
fileis always treated as a string, preventing potential type-related issues.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewAdditionalInfo.tsx (1)
23-27: Approve component structure changes with a minor suggestionThe refactoring of
ReviewMissingInfofrom a constant to an exported function component is a positive change that aligns with modern React patterns. The inline export and the addition of a default value foradditionalInfoimprove code clarity and robustness.For improved type safety, consider explicitly typing the component:
export const ReviewMissingInfo: React.FC<Props> = ({ application, isEditable, additionalInfo = { remarks: '' }, }: Props) => { // ... }This change ensures that the component's props are correctly typed and can help catch potential type-related issues earlier in the development process.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/PrerequisiteSummary/SummaryItem.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-101: Overall, excellent adherence to coding guidelines with room for minor enhancementsThe
SummaryItemcomponent demonstrates good practices aligned with the coding guidelines for thelibsdirectory:
- It uses TypeScript effectively for defining props and exporting types.
- The component imports and uses UI components from '@island.is/island-ui/core', promoting reusability across different NextJS apps.
- The logic is focused and clear, enhancing maintainability and potential reusability.
Suggestions for minor improvements:
- Consider using more specific types for some props. For example,
indexcould be typed asnumber, andprerequisiteMetasboolean.- The
buttonLinkprop is used directly inwindow.location.href. Consider adding a utility function to sanitize this URL to prevent potential security issues.- For better performance, you might want to memoize the component using
React.memoif it's expected to re-render frequently with the same props.Would you like me to provide code snippets for these improvements?
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/MissingInfoForm.ts (3)
31-37: Improved agent comments field with better type safety and user experienceThe replacement of
buildCustomFieldwithbuildDescriptionFieldenhances type safety and aligns with the PR objective of removing custom components. The use ofgetValueViaPathfor retrieving agent comments improves flexibility, and the default message enhances user experience.Consider extracting the path
'agentComments'into a constant for better maintainability:const AGENT_COMMENTS_PATH = 'agentComments'; // Then use it in the getValueViaPath call getValueViaPath<string>(application.answers, AGENT_COMMENTS_PATH)This change would make it easier to update the path if needed in the future.
67-75: Enhanced checkbox field with improved type safety and localization supportThe replacement of
buildCustomFieldwithbuildCheckboxFieldimproves type safety and aligns with the PR objective of standardizing the application. The use of theYESconstant and deriving the label fromm.confirmCorrectInfoenhances code readability and supports localization.For consistency with other fields, consider adding a title to the checkbox:
buildCheckboxField({ id: 'confirmMissingInfo', title: m.confirmMissingInfoTitle, // Add a title message in your messages file options: [ { value: YES, label: m.confirmCorrectInfo, }, ], }),This change would make the field structure more consistent with other fields in the form.
Line range hint
1-99: Improved form structure with enhanced consistency and localization supportThe overall structure of the form has been improved while maintaining good organization and readability. The changes align well with the PR objectives of enhancing consistency and integrating Zod for validation. The consistent use of message objects (
m.) throughout the form supports localization efforts.To further improve consistency, consider using
buildTextFieldorbuildDescriptionFieldfor themissingInfo.remarksfield instead ofbuildCustomField:buildDescriptionField({ id: 'missingInfo.remarks', title: m.remarksTitle, // Add a title message in your messages file description: '', // Add a description if needed }),This change would align the
remarksfield with the other standardized fields in the form.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/statusAndChildrenSection.ts (1)
43-88: LGTM: Radio fields and conditional fields are well-structuredThe radio fields for status type and children are properly implemented using
buildRadioField. The conditional fields (description, file upload, and alert message) provide a good user experience by showing relevant information based on user input.Consider improving type safety in the condition functions. For example:
condition: (answers: { status?: { type: string } }) => answers.status?.type === EmploymentStatus.STUDENT,This change would provide better type checking and autocompletion in IDEs.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/PrerequisitesForm.ts (2)
21-21: Consider using a more descriptive name for the imported messages object.While the import of messages is a good practice for localization, using a single-letter variable name 'm' might reduce code readability. Consider using a more descriptive name like 'messages' or 'translations' to improve clarity.
-import { m } from '../lib/messages/messages' +import { messages } from '../lib/messages/messages'
Line range hint
71-81: Approve the addition of new data provider items with a suggestion.The addition of 'userProfile' and 'healthInsurance' data provider items is a good step towards integrating Zod for validation. However, consider adding meaningful titles and subtitles for these items if appropriate, to maintain consistency with other data provider items and improve user understanding.
If titles and subtitles are needed, consider adding them like this:
buildDataProviderItem({ id: 'userProfile', provider: UserProfileApi, - title: '', - subTitle: '', + title: m.userProfileTitle, + subTitle: m.userProfileSubTitle, }), buildDataProviderItem({ id: 'healthInsurance', provider: HealthInsuranceApi, - title: '', - subTitle: '', + title: m.healthInsuranceTitle, + subTitle: m.healthInsuranceSubTitle, }),libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ContactInfo.tsx (2)
19-19: Approve component declaration changes with a minor suggestionThe updated component declaration looks good:
- It's now exported directly as an arrow function, which is more concise.
- The type annotation has been simplified to
ReviewFieldProps.These changes align with modern React practices and improve code readability. Good job!
Minor suggestion: Consider using object destructuring for the
applicationprop to make it clear what properties ofReviewFieldPropsare being used. For example:export const ContactInfo = ({ application }: { application: ReviewFieldProps['application'] }) => { // ... }This change would make the component's input more explicit and type-safe.
Line range hint
1-124: Approve adherence to library coding guidelines with a suggestionThe code adheres well to the coding guidelines for library files:
- It uses TypeScript for defining props and exporting types.
- The component structure suggests reusability across different NextJS apps.
To further improve tree-shaking capabilities, consider the following suggestion:
Instead of importing the entire
@island.is/island-ui/corepackage, import only the specific components used:import { Box, GridColumn, GridRow, Input, Stack } from '@island.is/island-ui/core'This change can potentially reduce the bundle size in applications that use this component.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/HealthInsuranceTemplate.ts (2)
19-21: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.The changes to the import statements look good and align with the coding guidelines for library files. The reorganization may improve tree-shaking and bundling. The new
dataSchemaimport suggests a move towards better type safety, which is great.Consider grouping related imports together. For example, you could move the
API_MODULEimport next to other application-specific imports for better organization.
Line range hint
1-185: Overall structure looks good. Consider enhancing type safety further.The unchanged parts of the
HealthInsuranceTemplatecontinue to adhere to the coding guidelines. The template maintains its reusability across different NextJS apps, and TypeScript is used effectively for defining props and exporting types.To further enhance type safety and maintainability, consider creating a separate type or interface for the template configuration. This would make it easier to ensure consistency across different templates and improve code readability. For example:
interface HealthInsuranceTemplateConfig extends ApplicationTemplate<ApplicationContext, ApplicationStateSchema<Events>, Events> { // Add any health insurance specific properties here } const HealthInsuranceTemplate: HealthInsuranceTemplateConfig = { // ... existing configuration }This approach would make it easier to spot any missing or incorrect properties in the template configuration.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/FormerInsurance.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-28: LGTM with a minor suggestion for import ordering.The import changes look good. Removing the React import is appropriate for newer versions of React. The named import for TextWithTooltip and the updated import path for messages are good practices.
Consider grouping related imports together and separating them with blank lines for better readability. For example:
import { useState } from 'react' import { useFormContext } from 'react-hook-form' import { useLocale } from '@island.is/localization' import { formatText, getValueViaPath } from '@island.is/application/core' import { GridColumn, GridRow, Input, Stack, Box, Text, } from '@island.is/island-ui/core' import { FieldDescription, RadioController, } from '@island.is/shared/form-fields' import { FileUploadController } from '@island.is/application/ui-components' import { TextWithTooltip } from '../TextWithTooltip/TextWithTooltip' import { m } from '../../lib/messages/messages' import { FormerInsurance as FormerInsuranceType, ReviewFieldProps, } from '../../utils/types' import { requireConfirmationOfResidency, extractKeyFromStringObject, } from '../../healthInsuranceUtils' import { FILE_SIZE_LIMIT, NO, YES } from '../../utils/constants'
Line range hint
36-241: Component logic looks good with a suggestion for readability.The core logic of the component is well-structured and seems to be working as intended. The use of island-ui/core components promotes consistency across the application. The conditional rendering and file upload functionality are appropriately implemented.
To improve readability, consider extracting some of the larger JSX blocks into separate components or functions. For example, the file upload section could be extracted:
const RenderFileUpload = () => ( <> <FieldDescription description={formatText( m.confirmationOfResidencyFileUpload, application, formatMessage, )} /> <FileUploadController id="formerInsurance.confirmationOfResidencyDocument" application={application} error={error} maxSize={FILE_SIZE_LIMIT} header={formatText( m.fileUploadHeader, application, formatMessage, )} description={formatText( m.fileUploadDescription, application, formatMessage, )} buttonLabel={formatText( m.fileUploadButton, application, formatMessage, )} /> </> ) // Then in the main component: {requireConfirmationOfResidency(defaultValues.country) && <RenderFileUpload />}This would make the main component more concise and easier to read.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messages/countries.ts (2)
3-1258: Improve consistency and specificity in country entries.The
messagesCountriesobject is well-structured, but there are two areas for improvement:
Country name formatting in the
idfield is inconsistent. Some examples:
- "Côte d'Ivoire" uses
cote_divoire(line 535)- "Bosnia and Herzegovina" uses
bosniaandherzegovina(line 145)- "Lao People's Democratic Republic" uses
lao_people_democratic_republic(line 615)The
descriptionfield is generic across all entries. Consider making it more specific, e.g., "Icelandic name for the country [Country Name]".Consider applying these improvements consistently across all entries to enhance maintainability and clarity.
1262-1262: Consider using a more descriptive name for the exported constant.While the use of
defineMessagesis correct, the namemfor the exported constant is not very descriptive. Consider using a more meaningful name that reflects its content, such ascountryMessagesordefinedCountryMessages.-export const m = defineMessages(messagesCountries) +export const countryMessages = defineMessages(messagesCountries)This change would make the code more self-documenting and easier to understand at a glance.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/countries.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-250: Consider enhancing type safety and expanding country information.While the country objects are well-structured, consider the following improvements:
- Add a TypeScript interface to define the shape of the country objects, enhancing type safety and developer experience.
- Consider adding properties that might be relevant to a health insurance application, such as:
- Currency code and name
- Time zones
- Official languages
- Emergency service numbers
Example interface:
interface Country { name: string; topLevelDomain: string[]; alpha2Code: string; alpha3Code: string; callingCodes: string[]; capital: string; altSpellings: string[]; region: string; currency?: { code: string; name: string }; languages?: string[]; emergencyNumbers?: string[]; timeZones?: string[]; } export const countries: Country[] = [ // ... existing country objects ];These additions would make the
countriesdata more robust and potentially more useful for the health insurance application.
Line range hint
1-250: Evaluate data usage and consider performance optimizations.Given that this file is part of a health insurance application template, consider the following:
Assess whether all the provided country information is necessary for your application. If not, consider trimming the data to include only the required fields, which could improve performance and reduce bundle size.
If the full dataset is needed, consider lazy-loading strategies or moving this data to a backend service to avoid including it in the client-side bundle.
If the data is used frequently, consider implementing memoization or caching mechanisms to optimize performance.
For improved maintainability, consider sourcing this data from an regularly updated API or database instead of hardcoding it in the application.
Example of a trimmed-down version if only basic info is needed:
interface BasicCountryInfo { name: string; alpha2Code: string; callingCode: string; } export const countries: BasicCountryInfo[] = [ { name: "Afghanistan", alpha2Code: "AF", callingCode: "93" }, // ... other countries ];This approach would significantly reduce the file size and potentially improve performance if the full dataset isn't necessary.
Line range hint
1-250: Summary of review and suggestions for improvementThe renaming of the
countriesconstant improves adherence to naming conventions. However, there are several areas for potential improvement:
- Enhance type safety by adding TypeScript interfaces.
- Evaluate the necessity of all included country data for the health insurance application.
- Consider performance optimizations, such as data trimming, lazy-loading, or moving to a backend service.
- Add health insurance-specific country information if relevant.
- Implement data maintenance strategies, such as sourcing from a regularly updated API.
These changes could significantly improve the file's usefulness, performance, and maintainability within the context of a health insurance application.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/confirmSection.ts (4)
27-27: Consider omitting empty 'title' properties.At line 27, the
titleis set to an empty string in thebuildCustomField. If a title is not needed, you can omit thetitleproperty to simplify the code.
32-32: Consider omitting empty 'title' properties.At line 32, the
titleis set to an empty string in thebuildRadioField. Omitting thetitleproperty can make the code cleaner if it's not required.
53-54: Provide descriptive 'title' or 'introduction' for the file upload field.At lines 53-54, both
titleandintroductionare empty for thebuildFileUploadField. Adding descriptive text can enhance user experience by guiding them on what files to upload.Apply this diff to add a descriptive
introduction:buildFileUploadField({ id: 'additionalFiles', - title: '', - introduction: '', + title: m.additionalFilesTitle, + introduction: m.additionalFilesIntroduction, maxSize: FILE_SIZE_LIMIT,Ensure that
m.additionalFilesTitleandm.additionalFilesIntroductionare defined in your localization messages.
38-50: Ensure conditional fields have proper accessibility labels.For the
buildTextFieldstarting at line 38, which appears conditionally based on user input, ensure that accessibility labels or ARIA attributes are set so that screen readers can properly interpret the field when it becomes visible.Consider adding an
ariaLabelorariaDescriptionproperty if supported.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/StatusAndChildren.tsx (2)
Line range hint
133-136: Inconsistent typing of 'children' state and defaultValueThe
childrenstate is initialized as astring, but thedefaultValuein theRadioControlleris set as astring[]. This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior.Consider ensuring consistent typing by changing the
defaultValueto astring:- defaultValue={ - getValueViaPath(application.answers, 'children') as string[] - } + defaultValue={ + getValueViaPath(application.answers, 'children') as string + }
177-183: Address TODO: Refactor and reintroduce ChildrenInfoMessageThere's a TODO comment indicating plans to refactor the review section and add back the
ChildrenInfoMessagecomponent after the accordion field merges. It's important to track this task to ensure it doesn't get overlooked.Would you like assistance in implementing this refactor or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (40)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/AgentComment/AgentComment.tsx (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/ChildrenInfoMessage/ChildrenInfoMessage.css.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/ChildrenInfoMessage/ChildrenInfoMessage.tsx (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/CitizenshipField/CitizenshipField.tsx (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/ConfirmCheckbox/ConfirmCheckbox.tsx (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/HiddenDateField/HiddenDateField.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/MissingInfoRemarks/MissingInfoRemarks.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/PrerequisiteSummary/PrerequisiteSummary.tsx (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/PrerequisiteSummary/SummaryItem.tsx (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ContactInfo.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/FormerInsurance.tsx (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewAdditionalInfo.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/StatusAndChildren.tsx (7 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/TextWithTooltip/TextWithTooltip.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ConfirmationScreen.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/aplicantInformationSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/confirmSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/formerInsuranceSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/statusAndChildrenSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/MissingInfoForm.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/PrerequisitesForm.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ReviewApplication.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/healthInsuranceUtils.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/HealthInsuranceTemplate.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/HealthInsuranceTemplate.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/answerValidators.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/answerValidators.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messages/countries.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/shared/index.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/countries.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/options.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (10)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/AgentComment/AgentComment.tsx
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/ChildrenInfoMessage/ChildrenInfoMessage.css.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/ChildrenInfoMessage/ChildrenInfoMessage.tsx
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/CitizenshipField/CitizenshipField.tsx
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/ConfirmCheckbox/ConfirmCheckbox.tsx
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/HealthInsuranceTemplate.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/answerValidators.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/answerValidators.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/shared/index.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/healthInsuranceUtils.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (29)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/HiddenDateField/HiddenDateField.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/MissingInfoRemarks/MissingInfoRemarks.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/PrerequisiteSummary/PrerequisiteSummary.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/PrerequisiteSummary/SummaryItem.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ContactInfo.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/FormerInsurance.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewAdditionalInfo.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/StatusAndChildren.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/TextWithTooltip/TextWithTooltip.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ConfirmationScreen.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/aplicantInformationSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/confirmSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/formerInsuranceSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/statusAndChildrenSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/MissingInfoForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/PrerequisitesForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ReviewApplication.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/HealthInsuranceTemplate.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messages/countries.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/constants.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/countries.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/options.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (50)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/index.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM: Import path update aligns with project reorganization.The change in the import path for
ExternalDataNationalRegistryfrom./typesto./utils/typesis consistent with the PR objective of reorganizing the application structure. This modification enhances code organization and maintainability.The use of TypeScript for type exports adheres to the coding guidelines, promoting type safety across the application. The file structure, with named exports and a default export, supports effective tree-shaking as required.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, let's verify the new import path:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Import path correctly updated
The new import path for
ExternalDataNationalRegistryinlibs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.tsexists and correctly exports theExternalDataNationalRegistryinterface. This update aligns with the project’s reorganization objectives and maintains type safety.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new import path and its contents # Check if the file exists if fd -p "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts"; then echo "File exists. Checking its contents:" # Check if ExternalDataNationalRegistry is exported from this file rg -t typescript "export.*ExternalDataNationalRegistry" "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts" else echo "Warning: utils/types.ts file not found. Please verify the new import path." fiLength of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new import path and its contents with corrected file type # Check if the file exists if fd -p "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts"; then echo "File exists. Checking its contents:" # Check if ExternalDataNationalRegistry is exported from this file using the correct type rg -t ts "export\s+.*ExternalDataNationalRegistry" "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts" else echo "Warning: utils/types.ts file not found. Please verify the new import path." fiLength of output: 378
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/index.ts (3)
1-1: Excellent change to named export for the Review component.This modification from default to named export enhances tree-shaking capabilities and allows for more granular imports, improving overall code reusability. The relative import path without file extension is consistent with TypeScript/JavaScript module resolution standards.
4-4: Approved named export, noting consistent import path structure.The change to a named export for TextWithTooltip is beneficial for tree-shaking and code reusability. The import path structure continues the pattern observed in previous components.
While the current structure is consistent, consider evaluating if this nested import path structure (
'./ComponentName/ComponentName') is necessary across all components, or if it could be simplified in a future refactor.
5-5: Approved named export, summarizing overall changes.The change to a named export for PrerequisiteSummary, like the other components, improves tree-shaking capabilities and maintains consistency with the established import path structure.
Overall, these changes to named exports across all components in this file are commendable. They enhance tree-shaking, improve code reusability, and maintain a consistent structure. Consider reviewing the nested import path structure (
'./ComponentName/ComponentName') in a future refactor for potential simplification, if deemed beneficial for the project's architecture.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/aplicantInformationSection.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and follow best practices.The imports are appropriately chosen for the file's purpose, using named imports which is good for tree-shaking. The use of modules from the @island.is ecosystem aligns with the goal of reusability across different NextJS apps.
1-9: LGTM: Adheres to coding guidelines for 'libs' directory.This file successfully follows the coding guidelines:
- It's designed for reusability across different NextJS apps.
- Uses TypeScript for defining the structure.
- Employs named exports, which is beneficial for tree-shaking and bundling.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/constants.ts (1)
8-11: Excellent addition of theYesNoenumThe introduction of the
YesNoenum is a great improvement. It enhances type safety, follows TypeScript best practices, and promotes reusability across different NextJS apps. The naming is clear and follows common conventions.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ConfirmationScreen.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-21: Overall structure and adherence to guidelines look good.The code follows best practices for library files:
- Uses TypeScript for type definitions.
- Imports reusable components from core libraries.
- Uses named exports, which is good for tree-shaking.
- Utilizes message constants for internationalization.
The form configuration is clear and well-structured. Keep up the good work!
3-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify the new import path and consider using an alias.
The import path for the messages module has been updated, which is likely due to a project structure reorganization. This change maintains the named import, which is good for tree-shaking.
To ensure this change doesn't break other imports, run the following script:
Consider using an import alias for frequently used modules like messages. This can make imports more consistent and easier to update across the project. For example:
import { m } from '@health-insurance/messages'You would need to configure this alias in your TypeScript and build configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Import path successfully verified.
All imports from
'./messages'have been updated to the new path, and no remaining instances of the old import were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from './messages' in the health-insurance template rg --type typescript "from './messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from './messages' in the health-insurance template rg "from './messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 107
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/HiddenDateField/HiddenDateField.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-33: Approve adherence to coding guidelines for library filesThe changes in this file adhere well to the coding guidelines for library files:
- The component remains reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is effectively used for defining props (FieldBaseProps).
- The switch to a named export supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
These changes maintain and improve the quality standards expected for shared library components.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/TextWithTooltip/TextWithTooltip.tsx (2)
12-17: Excellent improvements to export and function signature!The changes made to the
TextWithTooltipcomponent enhance its usability and align with best practices:
- Changing to a named export improves tree-shaking capabilities.
- The updated function signature with destructuring and default values for
titleanddescriptionimproves readability and flexibility.- The use of the
Propsinterface maintains strong typing, ensuring type safety.These modifications contribute to better reusability across different NextJS apps and more effective bundling.
Line range hint
1-38: Verify reusability across NextJS appsThe
TextWithTooltipcomponent appears to be well-structured for reuse, with clear prop definitions and no app-specific logic. To ensure it meets the guideline for reusability across different NextJS apps, let's verify its usage.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/MissingInfoRemarks/MissingInfoRemarks.tsx (3)
8-12: Great improvements in TypeScript usage and tree-shaking potential!The changes to the component declaration are excellent:
- Using a named export instead of a default export improves tree-shaking capabilities.
- Explicit typing of props as
ReviewFieldPropsenhances type safety and readability.- Defining default values in the function parameters is a clean TypeScript approach.
These modifications align well with the guidelines for TypeScript usage and effective tree-shaking practices in library files.
Line range hint
1-39: Excellent move to named exports. Verify usage across the project.The removal of the default export in favor of named exports is a positive change that further enhances tree-shaking capabilities and aligns with modern JavaScript best practices.
To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that imports of MissingInfoRemarks have been updated # Test: Check for any remaining default imports of MissingInfoRemarks rg --type typescript "import MissingInfoRemarks from.*MissingInfoRemarks'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Note: If any results are found, they need to be updated to use named imports
5-6: LGTM! Verify new import paths across the project.The changes to import paths for
mandReviewFieldPropsappear to improve the project structure and potentially enhance reusability. This aligns well with the guideline for reusability across different NextJS apps.To ensure these changes are consistent across the project, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: New import paths are consistently used across the project, and old import paths have been removed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new import paths are used consistently # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from '../../forms/messages' rg --type typescript "from '../../forms/messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 2: Check for any remaining imports of ReviewFieldProps from '../../types' rg --type typescript "ReviewFieldProps.*from '../../types'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 3: Verify the new import paths are used in other files rg --type typescript "from '../../lib/messages/messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src rg --type typescript "ReviewFieldProps.*from '../../utils/types'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new import paths are used consistently in TypeScript files # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from '../../forms/messages' rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "from '\.\./\.\./forms/messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 2: Check for any remaining imports of ReviewFieldProps from '../../types' rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "ReviewFieldProps\s+from '\.\./\.\./types'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 3: Verify the new import paths are used in other files rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "from '\.\./\.\./lib/messages/messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "ReviewFieldProps\s+from '\.\./\.\./utils/types'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 2276
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/index.ts (1)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and follow good practices.The imports are properly structured, using named imports and relative paths where appropriate. This approach promotes modularity and maintainability.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts (1)
7-10: Improved type specificity and consistencyThe changes in this file enhance type specificity and maintain consistency:
- Importing
EmploymentStatusinstead ofStatusTypesprovides a more descriptive and specific type name.- Updating the
typeproperty in theStatusinterface to useEmploymentStatusaligns with the import change.These modifications adhere to our TypeScript usage guidelines and maintain the reusability of the types across different NextJS apps in our shared library.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/options.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM: Imports and constants are well-organizedThe imports are appropriately structured, promoting reusability across different NextJS apps. The use of TypeScript for importing types (e.g.,
FormText) is in line with the coding guidelines.
45-55: LGTM: Well-designed YesNoOptions type and getYesNoOptions functionThe
YesNoOptionstype andgetYesNoOptionsfunction are well-implemented:
- The type definition enhances type safety.
- The function is flexible, allowing for custom labels or using default localized messages.
- Both are exported, promoting reusability across different NextJS apps.
This implementation aligns well with the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ReviewApplication.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-55: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The changes made to this file are minimal and don't introduce any breaking changes. The code adheres well to the coding guidelines for library files, using TypeScript and utility functions for better reusability. The form structure is well-defined and modular, which aligns with effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
As a minor suggestion, consider explicitly exporting any types or interfaces used in this form to further enhance reusability across different NextJS apps.
10-10: Verify the new import path for messages.The import path for messages has been updated. Please ensure that this change is consistent across the project and doesn't introduce any breaking changes.
Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in message imports:
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/index.tsx (1)
5-8: LGTM: Import statements have been improved.The changes to the import statements are beneficial:
- The more specific import path for messages (
'../../lib/messages/messages') enhances maintainability.- The switch to named imports for
FormerInsurance,StatusAndChildren, andContactInfoaligns with best practices for effective tree-shaking.These modifications adhere to the coding guidelines for library files, promoting better bundling practices.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (1)
4-7: Improved import structure and naming conventionsThe changes to the import statements enhance code organization and follow best practices:
- Using named imports for
AgentCommentandMissingInfoRemarksimproves tree-shaking capabilities.- The updated import paths (
'../../utils/types'and'../../lib/messages/messages') suggest a more organized project structure.These modifications align well with the coding guidelines for reusable components in the
libs/directory.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewAdditionalInfo.tsx (3)
11-11: Approve TypeScript usageThe use of TypeScript in this file is commendable. The
Propsinterface is well-defined, extendingReviewFieldPropsand adding theadditionalInfoproperty. Importing types from a separate utils file (../../utils/types) promotes code reusability and maintainability.This approach aligns well with best practices for TypeScript usage in React components within a library context.
Also applies to: 19-21
Line range hint
1-27: Approve structure for effective tree-shaking and bundlingThe current structure of imports and exports in this file is well-suited for effective tree-shaking and bundling:
- Use of named imports and exports.
- Absence of default exports or
export *statements.- The main export is the component itself, which is appropriate for its purpose.
This approach allows bundlers to effectively eliminate unused code, potentially reducing the final bundle size. Keep up the good work in maintaining a tree-shaking-friendly code structure.
11-12: Verify import path changes and their impact on tree-shakingThe import paths for types, messages, and constants have been updated. While this change might improve code organization, it's important to ensure that:
- These new paths are correct and consistent with the project structure.
- The changes don't negatively impact tree-shaking capabilities.
To confirm the correctness of these imports and their potential impact on tree-shaking, please run the following script:
Please review the script output to ensure all imported files exist and there are no
export * fromstatements that might hinder tree-shaking.Also applies to: 17-17
✅ Verification successful
Import paths are correct and no tree-shaking issues detected
The import paths for types, messages, and constants in
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewAdditionalInfo.tsxare valid and consistent with the project structure.Additionally, no
export * fromstatements were found that could hinder tree-shaking.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify import paths and potential tree-shaking issues # Test 1: Check if the imported files exist echo "Checking if imported files exist:" fd -e ts -e tsx "(types|messages|constants)\.tsx?$" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 2: Analyze potential tree-shaking issues echo "Analyzing potential tree-shaking issues:" rg --type typescript "export \* from" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 673
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify import paths and potential tree-shaking issues # Test 1: Check if the imported files exist echo "Checking if imported files exist:" fd -e ts -e tsx "(types|messages|constants)\.tsx?$" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 2: Analyze potential tree-shaking issues echo "Analyzing potential tree-shaking issues:" rg --type ts "export \* from" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src rg --type tsx "export \* from" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 739
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify import paths and potential tree-shaking issues # Test 1: Check if the imported files exist echo "Checking if imported files exist:" fd -e ts -e tsx "(types|messages|constants)\.tsx?$" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 2: Analyze potential tree-shaking issues echo "Analyzing potential tree-shaking issues:" rg --type ts "export \* from" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src rg --type typescriptreact "export \* from" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 763
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify import paths and potential tree-shaking issues # Test 1: Check if the imported files exist echo "Checking if imported files exist:" fd -e ts -e tsx "(types|messages|constants)\.tsx?$" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src # Test 2: Analyze potential tree-shaking issues without relying on type aliases echo "Analyzing potential tree-shaking issues:" rg --ignore-file .gitignore -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "export \* from" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 666
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/PrerequisiteSummary/SummaryItem.tsx (1)
Line range hint
25-35: Excellent improvements to component export and typing!The changes made to the
SummaryItemcomponent export and function signature are well-considered:
- Switching to a named export enhances tree-shaking capabilities and aligns with modern JavaScript best practices.
- Explicitly including the
SummaryItemPropstype in the function signature improves type safety and code readability.- Removing the
FCtype is a good practice, as it's not necessary and can sometimes cause issues with default props.These changes contribute to better maintainability and are in line with TypeScript best practices.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/PrerequisiteSummary/PrerequisiteSummary.tsx (3)
11-11: Approve component declaration update.The change to a named export arrow function with simplified props destructuring is a positive improvement. This update:
- Aligns with modern React practices.
- Enhances tree-shaking capabilities.
- Maintains type safety with TypeScript.
- Preserves the component's reusability.
78-78: Approve key prop enhancement for SummaryItem.The update to the key prop using a template string (
${prerequisite.name}-${i}) is a valuable improvement. This change:
- Ensures a more unique key for each SummaryItem, aligning with React best practices.
- Enhances the component's robustness for dynamic list rendering.
- Potentially improves performance in scenarios where the list of prerequisites might change.
1-1: Approve import path change with verification.The updated import path for messages (
'../../lib/messages/messages') appears to improve the organization of the codebase. This change aligns with best practices for maintainability and doesn't negatively impact tree-shaking or bundling.To ensure the new import path is correct and consistent across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Import path changes are consistently applied across the codebase. No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of message imports across the health insurance template. # Test: Search for message imports in the health insurance template rg --type typescript "from '.*messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insuranceLength of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of message imports across the health insurance template. # Test: Search for message imports in TypeScript files within the health insurance template rg "from '.*messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 2599
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/MissingInfoForm.ts (1)
2-2: Improved imports enhance type safety and reusabilityThe addition of
buildCheckboxField,buildDescriptionField, andgetValueViaPathimports, along with the inclusion ofApplicationandYES, aligns well with the PR objectives. These changes support better type safety and improve the reusability of components across different NextJS apps.Also applies to: 4-4, 11-11, 13-13
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/statusAndChildrenSection.ts (3)
1-20: LGTM: Imports and constants are well-structuredThe imports are appropriately organized, using named imports which promotes effective tree-shaking. The use of TypeScript for importing types is also commendable. This structure adheres to the coding guidelines for reusability and effective bundling practices.
22-28: LGTM: Main section structure is well-definedThe
statusAndChildrenSectionis properly structured using thebuildSectionutility, which promotes reusability across different NextJS apps. The section is correctly exported and includes necessary properties like id, title, and children.
1-92: LGTM: Overall structure adheres to coding guidelinesThe file successfully creates a reusable form section for health insurance applications, adhering to the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*. It effectively uses TypeScript for type definitions, promotes reusability across different NextJS apps, and follows good practices for tree-shaking and bundling.The structure of the form section, with its use of utility functions from
@island.is/application/core, ensures consistency and maintainability across the application.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/PrerequisitesForm.ts (2)
87-89: Approve the parameter name change in the condition function.The change from 'formValue' to '_formValue' is a good practice. It explicitly indicates that the parameter is intentionally unused in the function body, improving code clarity and adhering to common TypeScript/JavaScript conventions.
115-117: Approve the consistent parameter name change.The change from 'formValue' to '_formValue' in this condition function is consistent with the previous change. This systematic update throughout the file demonstrates attention to detail and maintains a uniform coding style, which is commendable.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ContactInfo.tsx (1)
12-12: Verify the correctness of the updated import pathsThe import paths for messages and types have been updated:
mis now imported from'../../lib/messages/messages'- Types are now imported from
'../../utils/types'Please ensure that these new paths are correct and consistent with the project's structure. If this is part of a larger refactoring effort, make sure all affected files have been updated accordingly.
Also applies to: 17-17
✅ Verification successful
Import Path Verification Successful
All updated import paths are correct and no remaining old import paths were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and usage of the new import paths # Check if the new message file exists if [ ! -f "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messages/messages.ts" ]; then echo "Warning: The new messages file does not exist at the expected location." fi # Check if the new types file exists if [ ! -f "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts" ]; then echo "Warning: The new types file does not exist at the expected location." fi # Check for any remaining old import paths in other files echo "Files still using the old messages import path:" rg --type typescript "from '../../forms/messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src echo "Files still using the old types import path:" rg --type typescript "from '../../types'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/srcLength of output: 648
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and usage of the new import paths # Check if the new message file exists if [ ! -f "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messages/messages.ts" ]; then echo "Warning: The new messages file does not exist at the expected location." fi # Check if the new types file exists if [ ! -f "libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/types.ts" ]; then echo "Warning: The new types file does not exist at the expected location." fi # Check for any remaining old import paths in other TypeScript files echo "Files still using the old messages import path:" rg "from '../../forms/messages'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' echo "Files still using the old types import path:" rg "from '../../types'" libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 600
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/HealthInsuranceTemplate.ts (1)
47-47: Great improvement in TypeScript usage!The change to directly use the imported
dataSchemaaligns well with the coding guidelines for library files. This modification enhances type safety and improves the potential for reusability across different NextJS apps.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/FormerInsurance.tsx (2)
30-35: Improved component declaration.The change from a functional component with React.FC to a regular function component with destructured props is a good improvement. This approach aligns with modern React practices, enhances type inference, and makes the code more concise and readable.
Line range hint
1-241: Overall, good refactoring that improves code quality.The changes in this file are primarily structural and align well with modern React and TypeScript practices. The component adheres to the coding guidelines for the
libs/**/*pattern, ensuring reusability across different NextJS apps. TypeScript is used effectively for defining props and exporting types, which enhances type safety and developer experience.Key improvements:
- Updated import statements for better modularity.
- Refactored component declaration for improved type inference.
- Maintained core functionality while enhancing code readability.
These changes contribute to better maintainability and consistency across the codebase. The component structure allows for effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messages/countries.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of
defineMessagesfrom 'react-intl' is appropriate for the internationalization purpose of this file.
1260-1260: LGTM: Type export is well-defined.The export of the
messagesCountriestype, derived from the keys of themessagesCountriesobject, is a good practice. It enables type-safe access to the messages throughout the application.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/countries.ts (1)
1-1: Approve the naming convention change.The change from
Countriestocountriesaligns with JavaScript/TypeScript best practices for naming constants. This change improves consistency with common coding standards.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (2)
5-9: Well-definedFileSchemaenhances reusabilityThe
FileSchemais properly defined using Zod with the required fieldsname,key, and the optionalurl. This promotes reusability across different NextJS apps and aligns with effective TypeScript practices.
25-25: Ensure consistent handling ofYesNoenums in formsThe
childrenfield usesz.nativeEnum(YesNo), which is appropriate. Verify that the form components correctly handle theYesNoenum to maintain consistency across the application.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/confirmSection.ts (1)
17-93: Overall, the confirm section is well-structured and reusable.The
confirmSectionis well-organized, using conditional rendering effectively based on user responses. The separation into individual fields enhances maintainability and reusability across different applications.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/StatusAndChildren.tsx (2)
23-27: Simplify component typing for claritySwitching from
FC<PropsWithChildren<ReviewFieldProps>>to directly typing the props asReviewFieldPropsimproves readability and clarity. This change makes the component's intent clearer, especially since it doesn't utilizechildren.
52-52: Ensure type safety when casting valuesWhen setting
status.type, castingvaluetoEmploymentStatusassumes that thevalueprovided is always a valid member of theEmploymentStatusenum. Ensure that allvalueproperties in theRadioControlleroptions are validEmploymentStatusvalues to prevent potential runtime errors.libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/formerInsuranceSection.ts (2)
21-166: Confirm adherence to coding guidelines for library codeSince this file is within the
libsdirectory, ensure that:
- Components and hooks are reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is effectively used for defining types and interfaces.
- The code supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
Consider reviewing the exports and dependencies to confirm they align with best practices for library code.
85-85: Validate the file size limit for uploadsThe
FILE_SIZE_LIMITconstant is used at line 85 to set the maximum upload size. Ensure that this limit is appropriate for your use case and that it aligns with backend constraints to prevent upload errors.You can check the value of
FILE_SIZE_LIMITand confirm it's suitable:✅ Verification successful
The initial search for
FILE_SIZE_LIMITin../../utils/constantsdid not find the definition. Please run the following script to locate theFILE_SIZE_LIMITconstant in the codebase:
FILE_SIZE_LIMIT is correctly set to 10MB in
health-insurance/src/utils/constants.ts. Please ensure that the backend also supports this upload limit to prevent any potential upload issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the value of FILE_SIZE_LIMIT # Expected: FILE_SIZE_LIMIT is defined and set to an appropriate value. rg --type ts --no-heading --line-number "export const FILE_SIZE_LIMIT" ../../utils/constantsLength of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the FILE_SIZE_LIMIT constant across the entire codebase rg --type ts "export const FILE_SIZE_LIMIT"Length of output: 1415
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/HiddenDateField/HiddenDateField.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ication/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/statusAndChildrenSection.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/confirmSection.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/confirmSection.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...plication/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/formerInsuranceSection.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...plication/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/formerInsuranceSection.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/constants.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/StatusAndChildren.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…suranceForm/confirmSection.ts Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/getFormerCountryAndCitizenship.ts (2)
5-12: Function looks good, but consider improving type safety.The
getFormerCountryAndCitizenshipfunction is well-structured and focused. It adheres to the coding guidelines by being potentially reusable across different NextJS apps. However, to enhance type safety, consider using type guards or runtime checks instead of type assertions.Here's a suggestion to improve type safety:
export const getFormerCountryAndCitizenship = (answers: FormValue) => { const formerCountry = getValueViaPath(answers, 'formerInsurance.country') const citizenship = getValueViaPath(answers, 'citizenship') if (typeof formerCountry !== 'string' || typeof citizenship !== 'string') { throw new Error('Invalid formerCountry or citizenship value') } return { formerCountry, citizenship } }This change ensures that the function will throw an error if the expected values are not strings, rather than silently accepting potentially incorrect types.
14-17: Consider renaming the function for clarity.The
formerInsuranceConditionfunction is well-structured and reuses thegetFormerCountryAndCitizenshipfunction effectively. However, the function name doesn't clearly convey its purpose.Consider renaming the function to better reflect its functionality:
export const isWaitingPeriodNotRequired = (answers: FormValue) => { const { formerCountry, citizenship } = getFormerCountryAndCitizenship(answers) return !requireWaitingPeriod(formerCountry, citizenship) }This name change makes the function's purpose more explicit and improves code readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/formerInsuranceSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/getFormerCountryAndCitizenship.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/formerInsuranceSection.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/project.json (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/getFormerCountryAndCitizenship.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/utils/getFormerCountryAndCitizenship.ts (2)
1-3: Imports and type usage look good.The imports are well-organized and the use of TypeScript types for function parameters enhances type safety. This adheres to the coding guidelines for files in the
libsdirectory, promoting reusability and effective TypeScript usage.
1-17: Code adheres tolibsdirectory guidelines.This file successfully meets the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory:
- The functions are potentially reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is used effectively for defining types and function parameters.
- The use of named exports and small, focused functions supports effective tree-shaking and bundling.
Great job on maintaining consistency with the project's standards!
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/project.json (1)
24-24: LGTM! Verify the new path includes all necessary message files.The updated command now targets all TypeScript files in the
src/lib/messages/directory, which aligns with the PR objective of reorganizing forms into separate files. This change should improve the maintainability of the localization process.To ensure all necessary message files are included, please run the following verification script:
This script will help confirm that the new path is correct and that the message files contain the expected content.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! All necessary message files are present and contain the expected content.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of message files and their content # Test 1: Check if the directory exists and contains TypeScript files echo "Checking for TypeScript files in the messages directory:" fd -e ts . libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messages # Test 2: Verify the content of these files echo "\nChecking the content of message files:" rg -t ts 'defineMessages' libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/messagesLength of output: 988
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (3)
1-1: LGTM! Consider grouping imports for better organization.The updated imports improve reusability and maintain proper TypeScript usage. The addition of
getValueViaPathenhances the component's functionality.Consider grouping imports by their source:
import { formatText, getValueViaPath } from '@island.is/application/core' import { Box, Bullet, BulletList, Stack, Text } from '@island.is/island-ui/core' import { useLocale } from '@island.is/localization' import { MissingInfoType, ReviewFieldProps } from '../../utils/types' import { MissingInfoRemarks } from '../MissingInfoRemarks/MissingInfoRemarks' import { m } from '../../lib/messages/messages'Also applies to: 4-6
12-18: LGTM! Consider using object destructuring for missingInfo default value.The change to a named export and the props destructuring with default values are good improvements. They enhance tree-shaking capabilities and component robustness.
Consider using object destructuring for the missingInfo default value:
export const ReviewMissingInfo = ({ application, field, isEditable, missingInfo: { date = '', remarks = '' } = {}, index: missingInfoIndex, }: Props) => {This approach can make the default value assignment more concise and aligned with modern JavaScript practices.
29-38: LGTM! Consider using nullish coalescing for fallback message.The use of Stack and Text components from island-ui improves consistency. The conditional rendering of agentComments with a fallback message is a good practice.
Consider using the nullish coalescing operator for a more concise fallback:
<Text> {agentComments ?? formatText(m.agentCommentsEmpty, application, formatMessage)} </Text>This approach simplifies the conditional logic and handles both null and undefined cases.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/assets/Logo.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Consider adding a type annotation for improved clarity.The change to a named export is a good practice that can improve tree-shaking. The removal of the unnecessary type annotation simplifies the code.
For improved type safety and clarity, consider adding a simple type annotation:
export const Logo: React.FC = () => ( // ... SVG content )This explicitly declares that the component doesn't accept any props, which can prevent accidental prop passing in the future.
Line range hint
2-38: Consider optimizing the SVG implementation for better maintainability and performance.While the current implementation works, there are a few improvements we can make:
- Add
widthandheightattributes to the SVG for better browser compatibility:<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1300 323.32" width="100%" height="100%">
- Consider moving the SVG to a separate file (e.g.,
logo.svg) and importing it. This would improve readability and maintainability:import { ReactComponent as LogoSVG } from './logo.svg'; export const Logo: React.FC = () => <LogoSVG />;
If keeping the SVG inline, consider using a tool like SVGO to optimize the SVG code, potentially reducing file size.
Add
aria-labelfor accessibility:<svg aria-label="Island.is logo" ...>These changes can improve performance, maintainability, and accessibility of the Logo component.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/assets/Logo.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ConfirmationScreen.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/MissingInfoForm.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/PrerequisitesForm.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ReviewApplication.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ConfirmationScreen.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/HealthInsuranceForm/index.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/MissingInfoForm.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/PrerequisitesForm.ts
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/forms/ReviewApplication.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/assets/Logo.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (5)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (3)
3-9: LGTM: Import changes and FileSchema definitionThe addition of
YesOrNoimport and the newFileSchemadefinition are well-structured and align with the PR objectives. TheFileSchemapromotes code reuse and follows TypeScript and Zod best practices.
27-27: LGTM: Reuse offormerInsuranceschemaThe inclusion of the
formerInsurancefield using the previously defined schema is a good practice. It promotes code reuse and maintains consistency throughout the application.
28-30: LGTM: Updates tohasAdditionalInfoand newadditionalFilesfieldThe changes to
hasAdditionalInfoand the addition ofadditionalFilesare well-implemented:
- The use of
z.nativeEnum(YesOrNo)forhasAdditionalInfomaintains consistency with other boolean fields.- The new
additionalFilesfield, using theFileSchema, provides a flexible and consistent way to handle multiple file uploads.These changes align well with the PR objectives and improve the overall structure of the schema.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/fields/Review/ReviewMissingInfo.tsx (2)
8-10: LGTM! Props interface is well-defined.The Props interface effectively uses TypeScript to define the component's props, extending ReviewFieldProps and including the missingInfo property. This aligns with the coding guidelines for TypeScript usage.
21-24: LGTM! Improved data retrieval method.The use of
getValueViaPathto retrieveagentCommentsis a good improvement. It enhances the robustness of data retrieval and aligns with best practices for accessing nested properties.
What
Add zod to the health insurance application
Remove custom components
Split forms into file-per-screen
Translate country names
Why
Make this application use zod to be more like other aplications
Make code structure similar to other applications
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor